sizeof, is it a macro? function? or operation?

[Park, SungJae]

I found sizeof in table of Precedence hierarchy for C.

is it a operation? which have precedence..?

[Andreas Kahari]

In article <bo**********@news1.kornet.net>, Park, SungJae wrote:

I found sizeof in table of Precedence hierarchy for C.

is it a operation? which have precedence..?

It's a unitary operator (operator taking one operand, just
like unitary minus). Its precedence is shown in the table you
refered to.

--
Andreas Kähäri

[pete]

Andreas Kahari wrote:

In article <bo**********@news1.kornet.net>, Park, SungJae wrote:

I found sizeof in table of Precedence hierarchy for C.

is it a operation? which have precedence..?

It's a unitary operator (operator taking one operand, just
like unitary minus). Its precedence is shown in the table you
refered to.

The standard uses the word "unary" instead of "unitary"
to describe operators taking only one operand.

--
pete

[Andreas Kahari]

In article <3F***********@mindspring.com>, pete wrote:

Andreas Kahari wrote:

[cut]

It's a unitary operator (operator taking one operand, just
like unitary minus). Its precedence is shown in the table you
refered to.

The standard uses the word "unary" instead of "unitary"
to describe operators taking only one operand.

I *did* think it looked a bit funny when I wrote it...

--
Andreas Kähäri

[Dan Pop]

In <bo**********@news1.kornet.net> "Park, SungJae" <da*****@darkcity.siregi.net> writes:

I found sizeof in table of Precedence hierarchy for C.

is it a operation? which have precedence..?

Did you read the title of the table carefully? In my C book, it's
called "Precedence and Associativity of Operators". What do you think
"operators" stands for?

And, anyway, I'm pretty sure your C book provides a description of the
sizeof "thing". Check its index.

Dan
--
Dan Pop
DESY Zeuthen, RZ group
Email: Da*****@ifh.de

[Mark McIntyre]

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:36:24 +0000 (UTC), in comp.lang.c , Andreas
Kahari <ak*******@freeshell.org> wrote:

In article <3F***********@mindspring.com>, pete wrote:

Andreas Kahari wrote:

[cut]

It's a unitary operator (operator taking one operand, just
like unitary minus). Its precedence is shown in the table you
refered to.

The standard uses the word "unary" instead of "unitary"
to describe operators taking only one operand.

I *did* think it looked a bit funny when I wrote it...

"unitary" is a type of local government in the UK.

--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html>
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---