The const keyword and structures

[kelvSYC]

If you have an instance of a struct that's marked const, does the const
keyword mean that all of its members are read-only? What if you wanted
a struct where some members are constants and a few others you could
change?

Example:

struct foo {
const int a;
int b;
int (*c)(void);
}

const struct foo bar;

bar.a is constant
Is bar.b constant?
How about bar.c?

What if you wanted to have a structure where a and c are constant, and
b could be changed? Would you have to remove the const when declaring
bar?

--
I am only a mirage.

[Mike Wahler]

"kelvSYC" <ke*****@no.email.shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:091020032155120666%ke*****@no.email.shaw.ca.. .

If you have an instance of a struct that's marked const, does the const
keyword mean that all of its members are read-only?
It means the struct object cannot be modified.
What if you wanted
a struct where some members are constants and a few others you could
change?

Example:

struct foo {
const int a;
int b;
int (*c)(void);
}

const struct foo bar;

bar.a is constant
Is bar.b constant?
Yes, by implication (the whole object 'bar' is const).
How about bar.c?
Same thing.

What if you wanted to have a structure where a and c are constant, and
b could be changed? Would you have to remove the const when declaring
bar?

Yes.

-Mike

[Noah Roberts]

kelvSYC wrote:

If you have an instance of a struct that's marked const, does the const
keyword mean that all of its members are read-only? What if you wanted
a struct where some members are constants and a few others you could
change?

Example:

struct foo {
const int a;
int b;
int (*c)(void);
}

const struct foo bar;

bar.a is constant
Is bar.b constant?
How about bar.c?

Yes, but if you declaired it like, "struct foo bar;" then it wouldn't be.

NR