http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q1.14.html
It says "there are at least three other equivalently correct
ways of arranging it."
I find two solution
typedef struct node {
char *item;
struct node *next;
} *NODEPTR;
and
typedef struct node *NODEPTR;
struct node {
char *item;
NODEPTR next;
};
What is the remind solution? And which way is better?
--
[1;30m|[m
[32m ___[m
[32m(-_-)[m
[32m<¡ä¡ä>[1;30m¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w¢w [1;37mªÅ´ßªª³õ [0;37mshepjeng.twbbs.org [1;30m¢w¢w¢w
[1;30m¡þ[m [36mplum.cs.nccu.edu.tw[m