Tired of chasing free(tm) bugs?
Get serious about C and use lcc-win32. The garbage collector designed by Boehm is the best of its
class. Very simple:
#define malloc GC_malloc
#define free(a) (a=NULL)
NICE isn't it?
No more chasing free() bugs, no more this incredible tedious accounting where it is SO easy to miss
some pointer. Leave to the machine what the machine does best: the boring accounting work and
concentrate in your algorithm, the thing humans do best and where machines fail.
Garbage collection is not restricted to Java or C#. Lcc-win32 introduced it more than 2 years ago in
the context of a Windows C implementation. A DLL you link with your program, a header file more, and
MANY hours of debugging less.
And this code is portable, since Boehm's work runs in many Unices, workstations and many types of
machines.
Garbage collection means less headaches for you, and simpler programs to maintain and debug. The
amount of buggy code that is dedicated to manage the allocation system can be significant and it is
by experience one of the most difficults part to debug.
Scrap it! http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
jacob
Nov 13 '05
55 4066
"Richard Heathfield" <do******@address.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:bh**********@sparta.btinternet.com... Jussi Ekholm wrote:
jacob navia <ja*********@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote: There is "magic bullet" of course, I am not trying to sell you something since my compiler system is free. It is a great tool for PC applications, where there are no real time and memory constraints. I apologize if this is a stupid question (although, I recall someone saying "there is no stupid questions, only stupid people...), but what is this "magic bullet" you're talking about?
Jacob, I'm sure, meant to write "there is no silver bullet".
Exactly. Thanks for the correction :-)
In "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks, there is a chapter entitled "No Silver Bullet - Essence and Accident in Software Engineering". The chapter is subtitled: "There is no single development, in either technology or management technique, which by itself promises even one order-of-magnitude improvement within a decade in productivity, in reliability, in simplicity".
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:39:36 +0200
"jacob navia" <ja*********@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote: "Bjorn Reese" <br****@mail1.stofanet.dk> wrote in message news:3F***************@mail1.stofanet.dk... jacob navia wrote:
#define free GC_free [...] #define free(a) (a=NULL)
What about memory allocated by third-party libraries, which was not allocated using GC_malloc() and thus must be freed with free()?
Memory not allocated by the collector will not be touched of course. External libraries work without any problems!
The point was that if the external library passes you a pointer that you
are expected to free, then after your redefinition of free the following
code fragment gives a memory leak
{
char *derf;
derf = foo(); /* foo is in library and returns pointer from malloc */
/* do some stuff */
free(derf);
}
I would also point out that if you don't have to free some dynamically
allocated memory but other pieces of dynamically allocated memory do
need freeing you (or at least I) am more likely to make a mistake and
either use the standard free on a pointer that should be left for the GC
or not call it on a pointer to memory provided (though a library) by
malloc.
--
Mark Gordon
"Mark Gordon" <sp******@flash-gordon.me.uk> wrote in message
news:20030816213841.42106cd1.sp******@flash-gordon.me.uk... The point was that if the external library passes you a pointer that you are expected to free, then after your redefinition of free the following code fragment gives a memory leak
{ char *derf; derf = foo(); /* foo is in library and returns pointer from malloc */ /* do some stuff */ free(derf); }
I would also point out that if you don't have to free some dynamically allocated memory but other pieces of dynamically allocated memory do need freeing you (or at least I) am more likely to make a mistake and either use the standard free on a pointer that should be left for the GC or not call it on a pointer to memory provided (though a library) by malloc.
Yes, this could be a problem. Fortunately libraries that pass allocated
memory expecting you to free it are very rare. This is because they can
only work with one compiler system. The "malloc" implementations are
not compatible: you can't free with gcc's free() a piece of memory allocated
with MSVC, for instance.
That's why this example is not very real. Most libraries are designed to
work with many compiler systems and do not rely on the user freeing memory.
Usually they give an interface where you call some API to free the
allocated memory.
jacob
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:57:25 +0000 (UTC), in comp.lang.c , Richard
Heathfield <do******@address.co.uk.invalid> wrote: In "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks, there is a chapter entitled "No Silver Bullet - Essence and Accident in Software Engineering". The chapter is subtitled: "There is no single development, in either technology or management technique, which by itself promises even one order-of-magnitude improvement within a decade in productivity, in reliability, in simplicity".
Like all generalisations, this one is wrong. Counterexamples:
Clean water in london wiped out cholera inside a few year
pennicilin stopped a wide range of deaths
consumer GPS in the 1990s reliably position you to within feet
and what about HTTP?
I guess you could argue that none of these is a "single development".
Hmm, in that case, nothing ever is.
--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html>
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, jacob navia wrote: "Mark Gordon" <sp******@flash-gordon.me.uk> wrote ... The point was that if the external library passes you a pointer that you are expected to free, then after your redefinition of free the following code fragment gives a memory leak
{ char *derf; derf = foo(); /* foo is in library and returns pointer from malloc */ /* do some stuff */ free(derf); }
Simple answer: GC_free(x) can look to see if it allocated x. If it
did, it marks it for cleanup. If it didn't, it can pass x on to the
implementation's 'free' function (and kind of assume the user must
know what he's doing). Not a silver bullet, but avoids memory leaks.
I would also point out that if you don't have to free some dynamically allocated memory but other pieces of dynamically allocated memory do need freeing you (or at least I) am more likely to make a mistake and either use the standard free on a pointer that should be left for the GC or not call it on a pointer to memory provided (though a library) by malloc. Yes, this could be a problem. Fortunately libraries that pass allocated memory expecting you to free it are very rare. This is because they can only work with one compiler system. The "malloc" implementations are not compatible: you can't free with gcc's free() a piece of memory allocated with MSVC, for instance.
Well, *if* the library is compiled with the same object file format as
the compiler's generated code, then the library function (say Strdup())
doesn't actually contain any memory management code. It just contains
a call to '_malloc' or '@_MALLOC' or whatever, and when the linker
does its magic, the '_malloc' in the library code and the '_free' in
the user code match up and everyone's happy.
Of course, last I checked you couldn't use MSVC library files with GCC
object files, so all bets are off. But it's a file format problem,
not a library problem.
That's why this example is not very real. Most libraries are designed to work with many compiler systems and do not rely on the user freeing memory. Usually they give an interface where you call some API to free the allocated memory.
Strdup.
Also, I'm in the middle [or end, depending on motivation] of writing
an image-format library that has lots of functions like
int ReadPPM(const char *fname, unsigned char *(*data)[3], int *w, int *h);
for which the user is expected to call 'free' on the data pointer
when necessary:
unsigned char (*data)[3];
int w, h;
int rc = ReadPPM("input.ppm", &data, &w, &h);
if (rc < 0)
return EXIT_FAILURE;
else {
process(data, w, h);
free(data);
return 0;
}
Obviously the answer to this particular case is, "Don't use GC for
your image-format library's applications," and that's perfectly
reasonable. Just pointing out that there probably are a lot of
libraries in C for which GC would eventually be a problem.
-Arthur
In article <bh**********@news-reader5.wanadoo.fr>, jacob navia wrote: Yes, this could be a problem. Fortunately libraries that pass allocated memory expecting you to free it are very rare. This is because they can only work with one compiler system. The "malloc" implementations are not compatible: you can't free with gcc's free() a piece of memory allocated with MSVC, for instance.
Wrong. Shared and static libraries will contain only reference to malloc
and free calls. They will be resolved only when the final program is
linked (or, in case of dynamic linking, when it is run). At that point
a single implementation of malloc will be used an all is well. As long as
MS linker can read gcc's object files (and vice-versa), there is no problem in
mixing different compilers at all. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Bob |
last post by:
Are there any known applications out there used to test the performance of the .NET garbage collector over a long period of time? Basically I need an application that creates objects, uses them, and...
|
by: Ganesh |
last post by:
Is there a utility by microsoft (or anyone) to force garbage collection in a
process without have access to the process code.
regards
Ganesh
|
by: Rick |
last post by:
Hi,
My question is.. if Lisp, a 40 year old language supports garbage
collection, why didn't the authors of C++ choose garbage collection for
this language? Are there fundamental reasons behind...
|
by: Ville Voipio |
last post by:
I would need to make some high-reliability software
running on Linux in an embedded system. Performance
(or lack of it) is not an issue, reliability is.
The piece of software is rather simple,...
|
by: Bob lazarchik |
last post by:
Hello:
We are considering developing a time critical system in C#. Our tool used in
Semiconductor production and we need to be able to take meaurements at
precise 10.0 ms intervals( 1000...
|
by: mike2036 |
last post by:
For some reason it appears that garbage collection is releasing an object
that I'm still using. The object is declared in a module and instantiated
within a class that is in turn instantiated by...
|
by: Goalie_Ca |
last post by:
I have been reading (or at least googling) about the potential addition
of optional garbage collection to C++0x. There are numerous myths and
whatnot with very little detailed information.
Will...
|
by: Johnny E. Jensen |
last post by:
Hellow
I'am not sure what to think about the Garbage Collector.
I have a Class OutlookObject, It have two private variables.
Private Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Application _Application =...
|
by: Lloyd Bonafide |
last post by:
I followed a link to James Kanze's web site in another thread and was
surprised to read this comment by a link to a GC:
"I can't imagine writing C++ without it"
How many of you c.l.c++'ers use...
|
by: pushpakulkar |
last post by:
Hi all,
Is garbage collection possible in C++. It doesn't come as part of
language support. Is there any specific reason for the same due to the
way the language is designed. Or it is...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |