by everyone else except you..
:-)
ok jokes apart... if you look at the details.. expat is fine.. written
completely in c, has great performance results, compatible with C/C++ etc
etc..
but xerces beats expat, considering that it can go well with C/C++ and java
and also the number of OS supported..by it is far more than expat
its not enough ? ok
encodings supported by xerces are UTF 8/16 , UCS 4 , ISO8859-1 , ASCII ,
EBCDIC , CP-1252
hmmm.. expat unfortunately supports only UTF 8
So that gets its popularity..
yes.. but mind you xerces is bulky when compared to expat.
I get your next question mehturt.. "benchmarked by who" :-)
check this ..
http://xmlbench.sourceforge.net/inde...ge=results.php
but mehturt.. i agree that expat is very popular parser.. so going back to
Dinh's question,
why not try out this expat.. ( I havent tried it yet )
<Me*****@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
the most preferred by who? I use expat http://expat.sf.net