'Passing' an operator like <, >, == to a template function?

[Gundolf]

Hi,

I'm wondering if there is some neat way of passing a comparative
operator (<, >, = , <=, ...) to a template-style-function.

For starters, I guess we've all seen this neat little example:

template <class T> Min (T x, T y)
{
return x < y ? x : y;
}

Ok, but now suppose I wanted to use the _operator_ (here "<") as a
template instead - or even in addition to - the operand type:

bool template <operator O> comp (int x, int y)
{
return x O y;
}

So, having this I could say something like:
if (comp<=> (x, y)) ...
if (comp<!=> (x, y)) ...
and get the compiler to generate different versions of comp().

Of course I tried it and it doesn't compile :(
Can anybody think of a way of doing this (apart from using macros)?

Thanks,
Gundolf

[Victor Bazarov]

Gundolf wrote:

I'm wondering if there is some neat way of passing a comparative
operator (<, >, = , <=, ...) to a template-style-function.

For starters, I guess we've all seen this neat little example:

template <class T> Min (T x, T y)
{
return x < y ? x : y;
}

Ok, but now suppose I wanted to use the _operator_ (here "<") as a
template instead - or even in addition to - the operand type:

bool template <operator O> comp (int x, int y)
{
return x O y;
}

So, having this I could say something like:
if (comp<=> (x, y)) ...
if (comp<!=> (x, y)) ...
and get the compiler to generate different versions of comp().

Of course I tried it and it doesn't compile :(
Can anybody think of a way of doing this (apart from using macros)?

Check out <functional> header and functors 'equal_to', 'not_equal_to', et
cetera.

V

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* Gundolf:

I'm wondering if there is some neat way of passing a comparative
operator (<, >, = , <=, ...) to a template-style-function.

For starters, I guess we've all seen this neat little example:

template <class T> Min (T x, T y)
{
return x < y ? x : y;
}

Ok, but now suppose I wanted to use the _operator_ (here "<") as a
template instead - or even in addition to - the operand type:

bool template <operator O> comp (int x, int y)
{
return x O y;
}

So, having this I could say something like:
if (comp<=> (x, y)) ...
if (comp<!=> (x, y)) ...
and get the compiler to generate different versions of comp().

See std::equal_to and friends.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?