Using 'random_sample'...

[deancoo]

I'm just a tad frustrated right now, because I need to ask such a n00b
question. I'm trying to use 'random_sample', however, I'm getting back a
compiler error saying; " `random_sample' undeclared (first use this
function) ". I've looked a my C++ header file 'algorithm', and its
definition seems to be there. When I include the old style, algo.h, I only
get a warning, but compilation is successful. Should I just use algo.h,
because the SGI STL documentation says it should exist in header
'algorithm'. What am I doing wrong?!

d

[Pete Becker]

deancoo wrote:

What am I doing wrong?!

Misspelling random_shuffle?

--

Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)

[Artie Gold]

deancoo wrote:

I'm just a tad frustrated right now, because I need to ask such a n00b
question. I'm trying to use 'random_sample', however, I'm getting back a
compiler error saying; " `random_sample' undeclared (first use this
function) ". I've looked a my C++ header file 'algorithm', and its
definition seems to be there. When I include the old style, algo.h, I only
get a warning, but compilation is successful. Should I just use algo.h,
because the SGI STL documentation says it should exist in header
'algorithm'. What am I doing wrong?!

d

`random_sample' is an SGI extension, not part of the standard C++
library -- but using `std::random_sample' is likely to work.

HTH,
--ag

--
Artie Gold -- Austin, Texas
http://it-matters.blogspot.com (new post 12/5)
http://www.cafepress.com/goldsays

[deancoo]

"Artie Gold" <ar*******@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:39*************@individual.net...

deancoo wrote:

I'm just a tad frustrated right now, because I need to ask such a n00b
question. I'm trying to use 'random_sample', however, I'm getting back a
compiler error saying; " `random_sample' undeclared (first use this
function) ". I've looked a my C++ header file 'algorithm', and its
definition seems to be there. When I include the old style, algo.h, I
only get a warning, but compilation is successful. Should I just use
algo.h, because the SGI STL documentation says it should exist in header
'algorithm'. What am I doing wrong?!

d

`random_sample' is an SGI extension, not part of the standard C++
library -- but using `std::random_sample' is likely to work.

Hmmm, still not working.

[Raghu Uppalli]

What compiler are you using. Early version of gcc3.. had non standard
STL headers in a separate directory under the __gnu_cxx namespace. Is
that the case with you?

[deancoo]

3.4.2
"Raghu Uppalli" <ra****@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

What compiler are you using. Early version of gcc3.. had non standard
STL headers in a separate directory under the __gnu_cxx namespace. Is
that the case with you?

[Raghu Uppalli]

My earlier comment may be misleading. Newer versions of gcc/g++ also
have non-standard includes in ext/.

I am assuming you mean gcc-3.4.2. The following works for me...on gcc
3.4.2

#include <ext/algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
using namespace __gnu_cxx;

int main()
{
const int a = 5;
const int b = 2;
int A[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int B[b];
for ( int cnt = 0; cnt < 10; ++cnt) {
random_sample(A, A+a, B, B+b);
cout << "Turn " << cnt << ": " ;
for (int i =0; i < b; ++i) {
cout << B[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
}

[deancoo]

"Raghu Uppalli" <ra****@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...

My earlier comment may be misleading. Newer versions of gcc/g++ also
have non-standard includes in ext/.

I am assuming you mean gcc-3.4.2. The following works for me...on gcc
3.4.2

#include <ext/algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
using namespace __gnu_cxx;

int main()
{
const int a = 5;
const int b = 2;
int A[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int B[b];
for ( int cnt = 0; cnt < 10; ++cnt) {
random_sample(A, A+a, B, B+b);
cout << "Turn " << cnt << ": " ;
for (int i =0; i < b; ++i) {
cout << B[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
}

Yup, that was the problem. I wasn't giving the extra bit of path
information in the include statement for the compiler to find the
non-standard algorithm header file.

Thanks a lot dude! Now I don't have to get that darn warning each time I
compile.

Cheers,
d