Assignment to std::complex number

[zender]

Hi,

Is it possible to a value separately to the real or imaginary
part of a complex number?

Any help appreciated,
Charlie

The following code shows that .real() and .imag() are not lvalues:

#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
int main()
{
std::complex<double> scalar;
scalar.real()=0.0;
}

zender@ashes:~/c++$ g++ -Wall -g -I${HOME}/include -o tst tst.cc
tst.cc: In function `int main()':
tst.cc:17: error: non-lvalue in assignment

[Mike Wahler]

<ze****@uci.edu> wrote in message
news:11*********************@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...

Hi,

Is it possible to a value separately to the real or imaginary
part of a complex number?
I don't think so.

Any help appreciated,
Charlie

The following code shows that .real() and .imag() are not lvalues:
True. They return by value, not by reference.

#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
int main()
{
std::complex<double> scalar;
scalar.real()=0.0;
scalar = std::complex<double>(0, scalar.imag());
}

-Mike

[Jonathan Turkanis]

ze****@uci.edu wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to a value separately to the real or imaginary
part of a complex number?

No, but there is support for adding this feature. See
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...004/n1589.html.

Jonathan

[Charlie Zender]

Thanks for the info!
Making real and imaginary component public and separatly assignable
would simplify many physics codes.

Charlie

[John Carson]

<ze****@uci.edu> wrote in message
news:11*********************@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com

Hi,

Is it possible to a value separately to the real or imaginary
part of a complex number?

Any help appreciated,
Charlie

The following code shows that .real() and .imag() are not lvalues:

#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
int main()
{
std::complex<double> scalar;
scalar.real()=0.0;
}

For what it is worth VC++.Net offers the following "set function" as a
non-standard extension (presumably courtesy of the Dinkumware library that
it uses):

#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
int main()
{
std::complex<double> scalar;
scalar.real(0.0);
}
--
John Carson
1. To reply to email address, remove donald
2. Don't reply to email address (post here instead)