std::transform container => std::abs(container)

[Steven T. Hatton]

This code works for dividing each element of a boost::array<> by a value of
its element type:

template <typename T, size_t S>
inline boost::array<T, S>& operator/=( boost::array<T, S>& lhs, const T&
rhs ) {
std::transform( lhs.begin()
, lhs.end()
, lhs.begin()
, std::bind2nd( std::divides<T>(), rhs ) );
return lhs;
}

I want to use std::transform in a similar fashion to set each element of a
boost::array<> to the result of applying std::abs() to it.

The result can easily be obtained with this code:

template <typename T, size_t Order_S>
inline boost::array<T, Order_S>& abs( boost::array<T, Order_S>& v ) {
for ( size_t i = 0; i < v.size(); i++ ) {
v[ i ] = std::abs( v[ i ] );
}
return v;
}

I would like to know how to apply a function such as std::abs in a way
similar to the use of std::bind2nd ( std::divides<T>(), rhs ) in the above
example. How can this be done?

--
"If our hypothesis is about anything and not about some one or more
particular things, then our deductions constitute mathematics. Thus
mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we
are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true." - Bertrand
Russell

[Siemel Naran]

"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote in message

std::transform( lhs.begin()
, lhs.end()
, lhs.begin()
, std::bind2nd( std::divides<T>(), rhs ) ); I want to use std::transform in a similar fashion to set each element of a
boost::array<> to the result of applying std::abs() to it.

Here is one way

int (*absolute)(int) = &std::abs;
std::transform(lhs.begin()
, lhs.end()
, lhs.begin()
, absolute );

[Rob Williscroft]

Steven T. Hatton wrote in news:AK********************@speakeasy.net in
comp.lang.c++:

This code works for dividing each element of a boost::array<> by a
value of its element type:

template <typename T, size_t S>
inline boost::array<T, S>& operator/=( boost::array<T, S>& lhs,
const T&
rhs ) {
std::transform( lhs.begin()
, lhs.end()
, lhs.begin()
, std::bind2nd( std::divides<T>(), rhs ) );
return lhs;
}

I want to use std::transform in a similar fashion to set each element
of a boost::array<> to the result of applying std::abs() to it.

The result can easily be obtained with this code:

template <typename T, size_t Order_S>
inline boost::array<T, Order_S>& abs( boost::array<T, Order_S>& v
) {
for ( size_t i = 0; i < v.size(); i++ ) {
v[ i ] = std::abs( v[ i ] );
}
return v;
}

I would like to know how to apply a function such as std::abs in a way
similar to the use of std::bind2nd ( std::divides<T>(), rhs ) in the
above example. How can this be done?

Write you're own functor:

template < typename T > struct my_abs
{
typedef T return_type;

T operator () ( T const &arg ) const
{
return std::abs( arg );

/* or even better (ADL friendly version):
*/
using std::abs;
return abs( arg );
}
};

The other alternative is to put a cast into the call to
std::transform:

std::transform(
lhs.begin(), lhs.end(), lhs.begin(),
static_cast< T (*)(T) >( std::abs )
);
The disadvantage here is that for T = short (for example) there
is no overload short std::abs( short ), so the static_cast can't
succeed. Also Argument Dependant Lookup (ADL) can't be used.

Remember to include <cstdlib> and <cmath> so that you get all the
overloads of std::abs, also unless you use an ADL friendly functor
you'll need to include <complex> before calling std::abs if you want
your code to work with std::complex (this also applies valarray).

Rob.
--
http://www.victim-prime.dsl.pipex.com/

[Siemel Naran]

"Rob Williscroft" <rt*@freenet.co.uk> wrote in message

template < typename T > struct my_abs
{
typedef T return_type;

T operator () ( T const &arg ) const
{
return std::abs( arg );

/* or even better (ADL friendly version):
*/
using std::abs;
return abs( arg );
}
};

The standard typedef names are result_type and argument_type. These allow
compatibility with other standard binders in STL and boost like
std::bind2nd.

template < typename T > struct my_abs
{
typedef T argument_type;
typedef T result_type;
T operator () ( T const &arg ) const
{
using std::abs;
return abs( arg );
}
};

My preferred way is to derive from std::unary_function<argument_type,
result_type>.

template < typename T > struct my_abs : std::unary_function<T, T>
{
T operator () ( T const &arg ) const
{
using std::abs;
return abs( arg );
}
};

[Rob Williscroft]

Siemel Naran wrote in
news:u9**********************@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net in
comp.lang.c++:

The standard typedef names are result_type
Thanks I always get this wrong.
and argument_type.
AIUI (I haven't researched this myself, just going on snippets
from usenet) argument_type isn't needed (used).
These
allow compatibility with other standard binders in STL and boost like
std::bind2nd.

template < typename T > struct my_abs
{
typedef T argument_type;
typedef T result_type;
T operator () ( T const &arg ) const
{
using std::abs;
return abs( arg );
}
};

My preferred way is to derive from std::unary_function<argument_type,
result_type>.

Yep, but that does add an extra byte to the function object in some
cases:

struct my_functor : std::binary_function< int, int, bool >
{
std::less< int > m_less;
// operator here ...
};

The above has 2 subobjects of type std::binary_function< int, int, bool >
so EBO (Empty Base (class) Optimization) can't happen.

I am perhapse being needlessly pedantic (and possibly I'm premeturly
optimizing), OTOH typing "typedef T result_type;" is shorter (and IMO
less cryptic) than writing " : std::unary_function< T, T > ".

If only I could remember result_type not return_type all would be
well :).

Either way I have to lookup result_type or binary_function /
unary_function as I'm actualy not sure the bool return type above
shouldn't be the first argument.

Rob.
--
http://www.victim-prime.dsl.pipex.com/