Difference between int() and (int)

[James Aguilar]

I have searched about this issue, but I can't find anything because Google's
search feature ignores parentheses.

Here's the issue. When I write a conversion operator such as

//Assume Record is some UDT
operator int() (const Record& rec);

it is (unless I am mistaken) called when I write something like this:

int main()
{
Record rec = Record(5);
int numRec = int(rec);
cout << numRec << endl;
}

So what gets called when I do something like this:

int numRec = (int) rec;

?

Also, as a side note, can I add conversion operators for enums?

enum State { BLAH = 0, MOREBLAH = 1 };

operator Record*(const State& st);
//or is it
State::operator Record*(const State& st);

James

[Ron Natalie]

James Aguilar wrote:

int numRec = int(rec);
int numRec = (int) rec;
Both conversion forms perform the same conversion operation in this
case. Note that you can only use the first form with simple (single
identifier types). That is:
unsigned int numRec = unsigned int(rec);
is ill-formed.


Also, as a side note, can I add conversion operators for enums?

No.

[JKop]

unsigned int numRec = unsigned int(rec);
is ill-formed.

....?

So is:
unsigned numRec = unsigned(rec);
ill-formed?

And how would one create a nameless temporary of "unsigned long", seeing as:

unsigned long()
is ill-formed?!
-JKop

[Ron Natalie]

JKop wrote:

So is:
unsigned numRec = unsigned(rec);

ill-formed?
Good question. Now you've sent me looking towards the standard to see
if simple-type-specifier can have unsigned. And yes, it does.
simple-type-specifier is defined as any (optionally qualified)
identifier typename, or one of the following: char, wchar_t, bool,
short, int long, singed, unsigned, float, double or void.


And how would one create a nameless temporary of "unsigned long", seeing as:

unsigned long()

Well,
const unsigned& numRec = (unsigned long) 4;
would still work.

A cast and a single-arg'd functional conversion are the same semanticly.

[Victor Bazarov]

Ron Natalie wrote:

JKop wrote:

So is:
unsigned numRec = unsigned(rec);

ill-formed?

Good question. Now you've sent me looking towards the standard to see
if simple-type-specifier can have unsigned. And yes, it does.
simple-type-specifier is defined as any (optionally qualified)
identifier typename, or one of the following: char, wchar_t, bool,
short, int long, singed, unsigned, float, double or void.

Actually there is no 'int long'. There is 'long int', however. But
I think you just lost a comma in your list, between the "int" and the
"long".

Trying to avoid misinterpretation of your words, that's all...

V

[Ron Natalie]

Victor Bazarov wrote:

Actually there is no 'int long'. There is 'long int', however. But
I think you just lost a comma in your list, between the "int" and the
"long".

Yes, there should be a comma there (and for those new English types, one
after "double" as well).