By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
445,655 Members | 1,005 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 445,655 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

c++ grammar

P: n/a
Where do I find the complete c++ grammar (including the preprocessor
instructions etc.)?

Thanks

Jul 22 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
4 Replies


P: n/a
If you go to http://webstore.ansi.org and then search for 14882 the search
returns two documents:

1. ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming languages - C++ $281
2. INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882-2003 Programming languages - C++ $18

Can someone explain me what is the difference (besides the price) between
the two documents? I am a looking for the full c++ grammar.

Thanks
Jul 22 '05 #2

P: n/a
Costa B. wrote:
If you go to http://webstore.ansi.org and then search for 14882 the search
returns two documents:

1. ISO/IEC 14882:2003 Programming languages - C++ $281
2. INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882-2003 Programming languages - C++ $18

Can someone explain me what is the difference (besides the price) between
the two documents? I am a looking for the full c++ grammar.


The expensive one is dead tree. The $18 is PDF.
Jul 22 '05 #3

P: n/a
Costa B. writes:
Where do I find the complete c++ grammar (including the preprocessor
instructions etc.)?


Words like "complete" scare me off a bit. But I use K&R for the
preprocessor and Stroustrup for BNF for the C++ language. In each book,
they are in Appendix A
Jul 22 '05 #4

P: n/a

"osmium" <r1********@comcast.net> wrote in message news:2o************@uni-berlin.de...
Costa B. writes:
Where do I find the complete c++ grammar (including the preprocessor
instructions etc.)?


Words like "complete" scare me off a bit. But I use K&R for the
preprocessor and Stroustrup for BNF for the C++ language. In each book,
they are in Appendix A

Neither one is accurate for the language expressed by the current version of
the standard. K&R doesn't even describe the original ANSI C properly.

Jul 22 '05 #5

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.