(*) Regular posters here: why is this? I've read this ng
on and off for a couple of years and never once seen
Code::Blocks even mentioned. Is there something deeply
wrong with it that I haven't yet noticed? I found it much
more polished and easier to use than Dev C++, with some
outstanding bells and whistles in the way of auto code
generation etc.
I also find Code::Blocks much more polished and also much more complete
than Devc++. When code::blocks development started, developer had in
mind to fill the hole of devc++.
In my opinion, Code::Blocks is from far, the best free IDE for win32
platform, though It also exists for Linux and MacOS, as it is developed
with multi-platform tools like wxWidgets, tinyXML and many more...
In addition, Code::Blocks developer community is very active, with
development snapshots ( nightly builds) released almost everyday.
Trying is adopting it. I have been programming with devc++ for a long
time, because i didn't want to use MS's one. One day, i found myself
looking for another IDE because of the annoying limitations of devc++
like : no workspace management, code completion works when it wants
(and that's not often...). I felt on Code::Blocks and idn't change my
mind. Devc++ projects (as MS's ones) can be imported into. You can use
it with any compiler because all the tricky stuff like creating the
command line for this compiler is already done.
No, I'm not a code::blocks developer, but i simply can't understand why
is it staying unknown...
I think you should try :
www.codeblocks.org