This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am wondering if people
who have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved
their ability to write C++ code.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m http://www.kdevelop.org http://www.suse.com http://www.mozilla.org 12  3534 
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote in message
news:8c********************@speakeasy.net... This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am wondering if
people who have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved
their ability to write C++ code.
I haven't read the book, but I know for sure that as a former C programmer
it definitely helped me to translate C++ constructs into the equivalent C.
I'm thinking particularly of virtual functions and multiple inheritance. In
fact I would go as far as to say it was when I understood how these two are
implemented in C terms that the penny dropped and I really began to progress
in C++. I've gone past that phase now and I can 'think in C++' but it
definitely helped during the transition.
john
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote in message
news:8c********************@speakeasy.net... This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am wondering if
people who have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved
their ability to write C++ code.
I haven't read the book, but I know for sure that as a former C programmer
it definitely helped me to translate C++ constructs into the equivalent C.
I'm thinking particularly of virtual functions and multiple inheritance. In
fact I would go as far as to say it was when I understood how these two are
implemented in C terms that the penny dropped and I really began to progress
in C++. I've gone past that phase now and I can 'think in C++' but it
definitely helped during the transition.
john
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who have read Lippman's
_Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who have read Lippman's
_Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone who acquired new
knowledge about C++ without synthesizing it into better programming
practices. I don't think anyone, regardless of the depth of their
experience, could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model" without at
least one new insight on C++, and that alone should be enough to improve
their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up on alleged
page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King after a couple of interminable
chapters.
Claudio Puviani
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone who acquired new
knowledge about C++ without synthesizing it into better programming
practices. I don't think anyone, regardless of the depth of their
experience, could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model" without at
least one new insight on C++, and that alone should be enough to improve
their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up on alleged
page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King after a couple of interminable
chapters.
Claudio Puviani
Claudio Puviani wrote: "Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone who acquired new
knowledge about C++ without synthesizing it into better programming
practices. I don't think anyone, regardless of the depth of their
experience, could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model" without at
least one new insight on C++, and that alone should be enough to improve
their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up on alleged
page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King after a couple of
interminable chapters.
Claudio Puviani
Lippman's books are frequently recommended by experienced programmers. My
criteria for choosing Stroustrup over Lippman were 1) Stroustrup created
the language, 2) Stroustrup had cooler epigraphs. Actually, I didn't like
the print format off the one book I looked at. It felt like a sophomore
textbook. Probably a style that appeals to a majority, but not to me. As
you can tell, I used discerning reason to select my learning materials.
I did some checking on who Lippman is. Quite an interesting bird, he. Does
a lot of stuff that appeals to me, such as the movie graphics. I broke my
word about Koening and Moo being my last C++ book for the foreseeable
future. I just ordered Lippman's _Object Model_, and _C++ Templates: The
Complete Guide_, by Vandevoorde and Josuttis.
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m http://www.kdevelop.org http://www.suse.com http://www.mozilla.org
Claudio Puviani wrote: "Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone who acquired new
knowledge about C++ without synthesizing it into better programming
practices. I don't think anyone, regardless of the depth of their
experience, could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model" without at
least one new insight on C++, and that alone should be enough to improve
their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up on alleged
page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King after a couple of
interminable chapters.
Claudio Puviani
Lippman's books are frequently recommended by experienced programmers. My
criteria for choosing Stroustrup over Lippman were 1) Stroustrup created
the language, 2) Stroustrup had cooler epigraphs. Actually, I didn't like
the print format off the one book I looked at. It felt like a sophomore
textbook. Probably a style that appeals to a majority, but not to me. As
you can tell, I used discerning reason to select my learning materials.
I did some checking on who Lippman is. Quite an interesting bird, he. Does
a lot of stuff that appeals to me, such as the movie graphics. I broke my
word about Koening and Moo being my last C++ book for the foreseeable
future. I just ordered Lippman's _Object Model_, and _C++ Templates: The
Complete Guide_, by Vandevoorde and Josuttis.
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m http://www.kdevelop.org http://www.suse.com http://www.mozilla.org
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote Claudio Puviani wrote:
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone
who acquired new knowledge about C++ without
synthesizing it into better programming practices. I don't
think anyone, regardless of the depth of their experience,
could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model"
without at least one new insight on C++, and that alone
should be enough to improve their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up
on alleged page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King
after a couple of interminable chapters.
Claudio Puviani
Lippman's books are frequently recommended by experienced
programmers.
For good reasons. He's clear and thorough and he knows his stuff.
My criteria for choosing Stroustrup over Lippman were 1)
Stroustrup created the language, 2) Stroustrup had cooler
epigraphs. Actually, I didn't like the print format off the one
book I looked at. It felt like a sophomore textbook. Probably
a style that appeals to a majority, but not to me. As you can
tell, I used discerning reason to select my learning materials.
Why choose one over the other? You can't go wrong owning both and sometimes
what you don't understand immediately in one, the other clarifies.
I did some checking on who Lippman is. Quite an interesting
bird, he. Does a lot of stuff that appeals to me, such as the
movie graphics.
He was interesting even before going to work for Satan Disney.
I broke my word about Koening and Moo being my last C++
book for the foreseeable future. I just ordered Lippman's _Object
Model_
No C++ programmer should be without it.
, and _C++ Templates: The Complete Guide_, by Vandevoorde
and Josuttis.
Make sure you get Alexandrescu's "Modern C++ Design" as a complement. You'll
find yourself liberally flipping between the two.
Claudio Puviani
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote Claudio Puviani wrote:
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for
everybody. Different people think differently. I often
stumble where others don't. And I often stroll through
what others find hard. I am wondering if people who
have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_
believe it improved their ability to write C++ code.
There would be something seriously wrong with anyone
who acquired new knowledge about C++ without
synthesizing it into better programming practices. I don't
think anyone, regardless of the depth of their experience,
could walk away from "Inside the C++ Object Model"
without at least one new insight on C++, and that alone
should be enough to improve their coding.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
That's subjective. I couldn't put it down, but I've given up
on alleged page-turners from Anne Rice and Stephen King
after a couple of interminable chapters.
Claudio Puviani
Lippman's books are frequently recommended by experienced
programmers.
For good reasons. He's clear and thorough and he knows his stuff.
My criteria for choosing Stroustrup over Lippman were 1)
Stroustrup created the language, 2) Stroustrup had cooler
epigraphs. Actually, I didn't like the print format off the one
book I looked at. It felt like a sophomore textbook. Probably
a style that appeals to a majority, but not to me. As you can
tell, I used discerning reason to select my learning materials.
Why choose one over the other? You can't go wrong owning both and sometimes
what you don't understand immediately in one, the other clarifies.
I did some checking on who Lippman is. Quite an interesting
bird, he. Does a lot of stuff that appeals to me, such as the
movie graphics.
He was interesting even before going to work for Satan Disney.
I broke my word about Koening and Moo being my last C++
book for the foreseeable future. I just ordered Lippman's _Object
Model_
No C++ programmer should be without it.
, and _C++ Templates: The Complete Guide_, by Vandevoorde
and Josuttis.
Make sure you get Alexandrescu's "Modern C++ Design" as a complement. You'll
find yourself liberally flipping between the two.
Claudio Puviani
I found "Inside the C++ Object Model" to be indispensable for a deeper
understanding of the core language constructs of C++.
In my opinion a "must read" for anyone serious about C++.
An easy read? Definitely not.
Cheers,
Martin
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote in message
news:8c********************@speakeasy.net... This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am wondering if
people who have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved
their ability to write C++ code.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org
I found "Inside the C++ Object Model" to be indispensable for a deeper
understanding of the core language constructs of C++.
In my opinion a "must read" for anyone serious about C++.
An easy read? Definitely not.
Cheers,
Martin
"Steven T. Hatton" <su******@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote in message
news:8c********************@speakeasy.net... This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am wondering if
people who have read Lippman's _Inside the C++ Object Model_ believe it improved
their ability to write C++ code.
Also. Is it a page-turner, or a challenge to get through?
--
p->m == (*p).m == p[0].m
http://www.kdevelop.org
http://www.suse.com
http://www.mozilla.org This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Steven T. Hatton |
last post by:
This is the kind of question that is hard to answer for everybody.
Different people think differently. I often stumble where others don't.
And I often stroll through what others find hard. I am...
|
by: randyr |
last post by:
I am developing an asp.net app based on a previous asp application.
in the asp applications global.asa file I had several
<object id="id" runat="server" scope="scope" class="comclass"> tags for...
|
by: Shawn |
last post by:
Does anybody know how to embed an Excel Worksheet into a (vb .net)
form?
I want the worksheet to appear as though it's a control on the form
with all the functionality of a worksheet. I don't...
|
by: Seok Bee |
last post by:
Hi All,
I have a webform with a button to add record into the database. When the
button is being clicked, the program will assign initial value controls in a
detailsview control. When the first...
|
by: Larax |
last post by:
Best explanation of my question will be an example, look below at this
simple function:
function SetEventHandler(element)
{
// some operations on element
element.onclick =
function(event)
{
|
by: t |
last post by:
Lippman's C++ Primer, 4th ed., p562, dicussion of protected members
seems to be wrong, unless I am misinterpreting things. He says:
"A derived class object may access the protected members of...
|
by: cincerite |
last post by:
Hello , guys , I'm reading C++ Primer 3rd edition recently.I tried to
download the errata of it from Stan Lippman's Home Page:http://
staff.develop.com/slip/ ,but it says:We're Sorry, we could not...
|
by: tonytech08 |
last post by:
What I like about the C++ object model: that the data portion of the
class
IS the object (dereferencing an object gets you the data of a POD
object).
What I don't like about the C++ object...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
| |
