partial specialization of templates

[Shekhar]

template<typename T> struct A{}; //line 1
template<typename T> struct B{}; //line 2
template<typename T> struct B<A<T> > {}; //line 3: partial
specialization of B

VC6.0 compiler results for the above:
at line 3:

error C2989: 'B<struct A<T> >' : template class has already been
defined as a non-template class
error C2988: unrecognizable template declaration/definition

Is there anyway to achieve the above without using partial
specialization of templates

Regards
Shekhar

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* cs***@yahoo.co.in (Shekhar) schriebt:

template<typename T> struct A{}; //line 1
template<typename T> struct B{}; //line 2
template<typename T> struct B<A<T> > {}; //line 3: partial
specialization of B

VC6.0 compiler results for the above:
at line 3:

error C2989: 'B<struct A<T> >' : template class has already been
defined as a non-template class
error C2988: unrecognizable template declaration/definition

Is there anyway to achieve the above without using partial
specialization of templates

Not in general, but there are tricks for special cases, essentially
replacing partial specialization by nested full specialization. Which
depends on the usage context. I suggest looking in the source code for
the VC 6.0 port of the Loki library.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* cs***@yahoo.co.in (Shekhar) schriebt:

template<typename T> struct A{}; //line 1
template<typename T> struct B{}; //line 2
template<typename T> struct B<A<T> > {}; //line 3: partial
specialization of B

VC6.0 compiler results for the above:
at line 3:

error C2989: 'B<struct A<T> >' : template class has already been
defined as a non-template class
error C2988: unrecognizable template declaration/definition

Is there anyway to achieve the above without using partial
specialization of templates

Not in general, but there are tricks for special cases, essentially
replacing partial specialization by nested full specialization. Which
depends on the usage context. I suggest looking in the source code for
the VC 6.0 port of the Loki library.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?