I swear, this godforsaken __fastcall qualifier that Borland came up
with is going to drive me insane! All I want is to subclass from a
class A with a destructor declared
virtual __fastcall ~A();
Is there any way for a subclass of A to have a destructor that ISN'T
__fastcall qualified? I cannot believe how lame this __fastcall crap
is...
--
Christopher[ Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.