"qazmlp" <qa********@rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:db**************************@posting.google.c om...
If base declares operator=() as private, is it possible for the
derived class to declare operator=() as public and allow assignment
access for it?
If no, why is it restricted so?
Think it this way. Each derived object has a base part.
You want to keep assignment operator in base to be private.
That means you can't invoke bases' assignment operator from the derived class.
Which in turn means that when you assign objects you will keep
base part of the old object and derived part of the object you are assigning
from.
Consider this example code -
#include <iostream>
class A{
public:
int i;
A(int i): i(i){}
private:
A& operator=(const A& a)
{
this->i = a.i;
return *this;
}
};
class B: public A{
public:
int j;
B(int i, int j): A(i), j(j) {}
B& operator=(const B&b)
{
// Can't invoke base assignment operator.
// A::operator=(b);
this->j= b.j;
return *this;
}
};
int main(){
B b1(5, 2), b2(6, 4);
b1=b2;
std::cout << b1.i << " " << b1.j;
}
Output - 5 4
See the difference?
-Sharad
