C-Like Strings?

[Lefteris Laskaridis]

Can anybody tell me what is the use of specifiying a function argument as
char const* const& instead of char const*?

for example:

char const* const& function( char const* const& someString )

-
Thanx

[Ron Natalie]

"Lefteris Laskaridis" <ce*******@germanosnet.gr> wrote in message news:a9*************************@posting.google.co m...

Can anybody tell me what is the use of specifiying a function argument as
char const* const& instead of char const*?

for example:

char const* const& function( char const* const& someString )

-

There's no real point in doing the above. Pointers are usually just passed in
registers, so const references to them aren't any better than just passing a copy.

Now if it were:
char const* & someString...
It would allow the function to actually change the pointer passed.

[Kevin Saff]

"Lefteris Laskaridis" <ce*******@germanosnet.gr> wrote in message
news:a9*************************@posting.google.co m...

Can anybody tell me what is the use of specifiying a function argument as
char const* const& instead of char const*?

for example:

char const* const& function( char const* const& someString )

-
Thanx

There is no point. The person who wrote the function probably thought that
returning a reference would be more efficient than just returning a pointer.
However, it is highly unlikely that a reference is easier to transfer than a
pointer, since the obvious implementation of passing by reference is just to
pass a pointer to the object. So whoever wrote this was probably just
confused.

Worse, returning by reference requires that function returns a reference to
an object outside of the function, which hurts maintenance flexibility. It
is hard to imagine an occasion to use this rather than just:

char const *function (char const *someString);

HTH
--
KCS