469,117 Members | 1,301 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 469,117 developers. It's quick & easy.

standard not clear about member function partial specialization


I've been looking into the standard for a clear statement on whether partial
specialization of member functions of class templates is allowed or not.

14.7.3/4 says that explicit specialization of a member function is legal,
but doesn't state that partial specialization is not.

One might argue that the standard indicates that partial specialization
implies a distinct template, and therefore defining a member function
requires the specialized class to be defined as well (explicitly
However, I don't find that very clear in the standard...

Did I just misinterpret some sections, or is this really somewhat blurry?


Jul 22 '05 #1
1 1453
Sorry, this should have gone to comp.std.c++
Jul 22 '05 #2

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

9 posts views Thread by Peter Koch Larsen | last post: by
2 posts views Thread by Jakob Bieling | last post: by
5 posts views Thread by desktop | last post: by
1 post views Thread by CARIGAR | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.