473,326 Members | 2,125 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,326 software developers and data experts.

.NET 3.0

Hello C# programmers:

I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain
much by moving to 3.0?

One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is
Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?

Thanks,

Bill
Oct 23 '08 #1
17 1578

"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Hello C# programmers:

I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain much
by moving to 3.0?
I am not sure I can answer this without knowing more.

In 3.5 (or 3.0), you can use WPF for your UI instead of standard forms. With
the state of tools, this will mean purchasing Expression Blend and there are
still some things that are hard to do. You also get LINQ for manipulating
data objects. And you get WCF, which you ask about below.
One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is Remoteing.
Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?
I would. Remoting is a pain in the butt to work with compared to WCF and you
end up completely rewriting bits if you have to make it openly accessible
via WSDL. With WCF, you just set up a new web endpoint and roll with it. So
there are two reasons:

1. Easier to set up (mostly declarative)
2. Ability to create standards based endpoints without rewriting

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Subscribe to my blog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

or just read it:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

********************************************
| Think outside the box! |
********************************************
Oct 23 '08 #2
Gregory A. Beamer (Cowboy) - MVP wrote:
"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>Hello C# programmers:

I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain much
by moving to 3.0?

I am not sure I can answer this without knowing more.

In 3.5 (or 3.0), you can use WPF for your UI instead of standard forms. With
the state of tools, this will mean purchasing Expression Blend and there are
still some things that are hard to do. You also get LINQ for manipulating
data objects. And you get WCF, which you ask about below.
>One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is Remoteing.
Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?

I would. Remoting is a pain in the butt to work with compared to WCF and you
end up completely rewriting bits if you have to make it openly accessible
via WSDL. With WCF, you just set up a new web endpoint and roll with it. So
there are two reasons:

1. Easier to set up (mostly declarative)
2. Ability to create standards based endpoints without rewriting
OK, thanks. Also, do I need VS 2008 or greater to move into 3.0
territory? I want to come up to speed on all this new tech more quickly
and would consider a class or workshop. How would I go about finding a
decent one in my area (San Antonio)?

--
Thanks,

Bill
Oct 23 '08 #3
//Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?//
YES.

Let me say it again. YES.
Here is a simple but effective demo.
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!158.entry
The WCF model is more effective way to code vs Remoting. WCF is more
"abstract", and allows you to write your code in one way...but provide
different endpoints (or ways to fish out your code). Aka, the same code can
serve up WebServices as it can Remoting.
Pre WCF, you had to code against 2 very different models.

.....................

You only go to 3.0 if you want the extra features. WCF and WWF (or WF)
(Windows Workflow Foundation)? They are "add-ons" to 2.0, not replacements.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...low+Foundation


"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Hello C# programmers:

I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain much
by moving to 3.0?

One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is Remoteing.
Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?

Thanks,

Bill

Oct 23 '08 #4
On Oct 23, 3:34 pm, Bill McCormick <wpmccorm...@newsgroup.nospam>
wrote:
Gregory A. Beamer (Cowboy) - MVP wrote:
"Bill McCormick" <wpmccorm...@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Hello C# programmers:
I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain much
by moving to 3.0?
I am not sure I can answer this without knowing more.
In 3.5 (or 3.0), you can use WPF for your UI instead of standard forms. With
the state of tools, this will mean purchasing Expression Blend and there are
still some things that are hard to do. You also get LINQ for manipulating
data objects. And you get WCF, which you ask about below.
One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is Remoteing.
Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?
I would. Remoting is a pain in the butt to work with compared to WCF and you
end up completely rewriting bits if you have to make it openly accessible
via WSDL. With WCF, you just set up a new web endpoint and roll with it. So
there are two reasons:
1. Easier to set up (mostly declarative)
2. Ability to create standards based endpoints without rewriting

OK, thanks. Also, do I need VS 2008 or greater to move into 3.0
territory? I want to come up to speed on all this new tech more quickly
and would consider a class or workshop. How would I go about finding a
decent one in my area (San Antonio)?

--
Thanks,

Bill
If you just want to move to .Net 3.0, you only need VS2005 with the
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.0
with features like LINQ.

Chris
Oct 23 '08 #5
//original//
If you just want to move to .Net 3.0, you only need VS2005 with the
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.0
with features like LINQ.
//adjusted//
If you just want to move to .Net 3.0, you only need VS2005 with the
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.5
with features like LINQ.

3.5 = LINQ


"Chris Dunaway" <du******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:e4**********************************@m74g2000 hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 3:34 pm, Bill McCormick <wpmccorm...@newsgroup.nospam>
wrote:
>Gregory A. Beamer (Cowboy) - MVP wrote:
"Bill McCormick" <wpmccorm...@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Hello C# programmers:
>I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain
much
by moving to 3.0?
I am not sure I can answer this without knowing more.
In 3.5 (or 3.0), you can use WPF for your UI instead of standard forms.
With
the state of tools, this will mean purchasing Expression Blend and
there are
still some things that are hard to do. You also get LINQ for
manipulating
data objects. And you get WCF, which you ask about below.
>One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is
Remoteing.
Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?
I would. Remoting is a pain in the butt to work with compared to WCF
and you
end up completely rewriting bits if you have to make it openly
accessible
via WSDL. With WCF, you just set up a new web endpoint and roll with
it. So
there are two reasons:
1. Easier to set up (mostly declarative)
2. Ability to create standards based endpoints without rewriting

OK, thanks. Also, do I need VS 2008 or greater to move into 3.0
territory? I want to come up to speed on all this new tech more quickly
and would consider a class or workshop. How would I go about finding a
decent one in my area (San Antonio)?

--
Thanks,

Bill

If you just want to move to .Net 3.0, you only need VS2005 with the
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.0
with features like LINQ.

Chris

Oct 23 '08 #6
sloan wrote:
//Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?//
YES.

Let me say it again. YES.
Here is a simple but effective demo.
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!158.entry
The WCF model is more effective way to code vs Remoting. WCF is more
"abstract", and allows you to write your code in one way...but provide
different endpoints (or ways to fish out your code). Aka, the same code can
serve up WebServices as it can Remoting.
Pre WCF, you had to code against 2 very different models.

....................

You only go to 3.0 if you want the extra features. WCF and WWF (or WF)
(Windows Workflow Foundation)? They are "add-ons" to 2.0, not replacements.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...low+Foundation
I see. I thought I needed to move to .NET 3.x to get WCF. So I can just
"add-on". Can you recommend some good reading to come to speed on WCF.

Thanks.
Oct 23 '08 #7

You need to get to (at least) level 3.0 to use WCF. However, 3.0 is just
additional libraries added to 2.0.
(as opposed to the 2.0 and 1.1 versions...2.0 was a STANDALONE REPLACEMENT
for 1.1).

Here are some links ... if you want to use VS2005/3.0

Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable Package (x86)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en

------------------------

Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Redistributable Package
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en

(Please note that 3.0 is add-on components to 2.0, and not a replacement for
2.0)
------------------------

Visual Studio 2005
(NOTE: Items which can be ~omitted~ in VS2005 install:
J#
C++
)

------------------------
Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/bb265237.aspx

------------------------

------------------------

Visual Studio 2005 extensions for .NET Framework 3.0 (WCF & WPF), November
2006 CTP
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en
------------------------

Visual Studio 2005 extensions for .NET Framework 3.0 (Windows Workflow
Foundation)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
------------------------



"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:49************@newsgroup.nospam...
sloan wrote:
>//Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?//
YES.

Let me say it again. YES.
Here is a simple but effective demo.
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!158.entry
The WCF model is more effective way to code vs Remoting. WCF is more
"abstract", and allows you to write your code in one way...but provide
different endpoints (or ways to fish out your code). Aka, the same code
can serve up WebServices as it can Remoting.
Pre WCF, you had to code against 2 very different models.

....................

You only go to 3.0 if you want the extra features. WCF and WWF (or WF)
(Windows Workflow Foundation)? They are "add-ons" to 2.0, not
replacements.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...low+Foundation
I see. I thought I needed to move to .NET 3.x to get WCF. So I can just
"add-on". Can you recommend some good reading to come to speed on WCF.

Thanks.

Oct 23 '08 #8
Hi Bill,

If your application will need to adopt some districuted communication
components, on windows/.NET platform, WCF should be the preferred one.

For ram up, I think the get start section in MSDN is good which contains
some basic walkthroughss:

#Getting Started Tutorial
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734712.aspx

Also, you can inspect the WCF samples from windows sdk:

http://blogs.msdn.com/dotnetinterop/...-samples-have-
been-updated.aspx

In addition, you can always get many new articles on WCF official sites:

#Windows Communication Foundation home

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

Sincerely,

Steven Cheng

Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at:
ms****@microsoft.com.

==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subs...#notifications.

Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://support.microsoft.com/select/...tance&ln=en-us.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>From: Bill McCormick <wp*********@newsgroup.nospam>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sloan <sl***@ipass.net>
Subject: Re: .NET 3.0
>sloan wrote:
>//Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?//
YES.

Let me say it again. YES.
Here is a simple but effective demo.
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!158.entry
The WCF model is more effective way to code vs Remoting. WCF is more
"abstract", and allows you to write your code in one way...but provide
different endpoints (or ways to fish out your code). Aka, the same code
can
>serve up WebServices as it can Remoting.
Pre WCF, you had to code against 2 very different models.

....................

You only go to 3.0 if you want the extra features. WCF and WWF (or WF)
(Windows Workflow Foundation)? They are "add-ons" to 2.0, not
replacements.
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...low+Foundation
I see. I thought I needed to move to .NET 3.x to get WCF. So I can just
"add-on". Can you recommend some good reading to come to speed on WCF.

Thanks.
Oct 24 '08 #9
On Oct 23, 4:07 pm, "sloan" <sl...@ipass.netwrote:
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.5
with features like LINQ.

3.5 = LINQ
There is no such thing as C# 3.5. The current version of C# is 3.0
and that is the version that adds LINQ and the other features. C# 3.0
goes along with the .Net framework 3.5.

Here is a link to an article about .Net versioning:

http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/Ch.../Versions.aspx

Chris
Oct 24 '08 #10
Steven Cheng wrote:
Hi Bill,

If your application will need to adopt some districuted communication
components, on windows/.NET platform, WCF should be the preferred one.

For ram up, I think the get start section in MSDN is good which contains
some basic walkthroughss:

#Getting Started Tutorial
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734712.aspx

Also, you can inspect the WCF samples from windows sdk:

http://blogs.msdn.com/dotnetinterop/...-samples-have-
been-updated.aspx

In addition, you can always get many new articles on WCF official sites:

#Windows Communication Foundation home

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx
Thanks Steven. Would you please enlighten me on upgrading from VS 2005
to VS 2008? Is it recommended that 2005 be completely uninstalled first?

Thanks,

Bill
Oct 24 '08 #11
I apologize.

I meant of course, the Framework Versions.

VS2005= Framework 2.0/3.0.

VS2008 = Framework 3.5 (or backwards)

I meant for him to notice you can't do Framework 3.5 stuff with VS2005.

Sorry for incorrectly .. correcting you!

"Chris Dunaway" <du******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:22**********************************@17g2000h sk.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:07 pm, "sloan" <sl...@ipass.netwrote:
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.5
with features like LINQ.

3.5 = LINQ
There is no such thing as C# 3.5. The current version of C# is 3.0
and that is the version that adds LINQ and the other features. C# 3.0
goes along with the .Net framework 3.5.

Here is a link to an article about .Net versioning:

http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/Ch.../Versions.aspx

Chris

Oct 24 '08 #12
You may still find some tools for 3.0 in 2005, but
"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:Ow**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Gregory A. Beamer (Cowboy) - MVP wrote:
>"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

OK, thanks. Also, do I need VS 2008 or greater to move into 3.0 territory?
I think you might find the 3.0 bits for VS2005, but I would go to VS2008
with SP1 and work with the latest (3.5 SP1). There is no reason to learn the
second latest when you can do the latest.
>I want to come up to speed on all this new tech more quickly and would
consider a class or workshop. How would I go about finding a decent one in
my area (San Antonio)?
If you want Microsoft training, you can try the Microsoft learning site.
There are plenty of online classes that might work (much cheaper):
http://learning.microsoft.com/manager/catalog.aspx

There is also a search engine:
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/classlocator/

But it is not showing San Antonio centers, so try New Horizons -- location:
8200 Ih 10 W # 500, San Antonio, TX 78230

Their site is:
http://www.newhorizons.com

The schedule for San Antonio is:
http://www.newhorizons.com/content/N...aspx?SiteID=91

It looks like there is a Visual Studio course, but not until March 2009.

One site you should become familiar with is www.netfx3.com. It is the site
for the new technologies in 3.x. There are plenty of videos, sample apps,
etc. Great way to learn. Also familiarize yourself with www.asp.net for the
latest in web technologies and www.silverlight.net for Silverlight (WPF for
the web) learning and samples.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Subscribe to my blog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

or just read it:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

********************************************
| Think outside the box! |
********************************************
Oct 24 '08 #13
I would say more declarative, but declarative is more abstract, so it works.
;-)

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Subscribe to my blog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

or just read it:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

********************************************
| Think outside the box! |
********************************************
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.netwrote in message
news:OP**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
//Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?//
YES.

Let me say it again. YES.
Here is a simple but effective demo.
http://sholliday.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!A68482B9628A842A!158.entry
The WCF model is more effective way to code vs Remoting. WCF is more
"abstract", and allows you to write your code in one way...but provide
different endpoints (or ways to fish out your code). Aka, the same code
can serve up WebServices as it can Remoting.
Pre WCF, you had to code against 2 very different models.

....................

You only go to 3.0 if you want the extra features. WCF and WWF (or WF)
(Windows Workflow Foundation)? They are "add-ons" to 2.0, not
replacements.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...low+Foundation


"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>Hello C# programmers:

I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain much
by moving to 3.0?

One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is
Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?

Thanks,

Bill


Oct 24 '08 #14
No need to uninstall. They install side-by-side. For a time, I was using
both. As none of my 2.0 apps will not compile 2.0 in VS2008, the only VS2005
I still have is for SQL Server Management Studio. And it is only there
because the VS2008 version (for SQL 2008) sucks when connecting to a SQL
2005 Database server. Once we switch to SQL 2008, I will can VS2005
completely.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Subscribe to my blog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

or just read it:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

********************************************
| Think outside the box! |
********************************************
"Bill McCormick" <wp*********@newsgroup.nospamwrote in message
news:49**************@newsgroup.nospam...
Steven Cheng wrote:
>Hi Bill,

If your application will need to adopt some districuted communication
components, on windows/.NET platform, WCF should be the preferred one.
For ram up, I think the get start section in MSDN is good which contains
some basic walkthroughss:

#Getting Started Tutorial
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734712.aspx

Also, you can inspect the WCF samples from windows sdk:

http://blogs.msdn.com/dotnetinterop/...-samples-have-
been-updated.aspx

In addition, you can always get many new articles on WCF official sites:

#Windows Communication Foundation home

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

Thanks Steven. Would you please enlighten me on upgrading from VS 2005 to
VS 2008? Is it recommended that 2005 be completely uninstalled first?

Thanks,

Bill

Oct 24 '08 #15
On Oct 24, 10:06 am, "sloan" <sl...@ipass.netwrote:
I apologize.

I meant of course, the Framework Versions.

VS2005= Framework 2.0/3.0.

VS2008 = Framework 3.5 (or backwards)

I meant for him to notice you can't do Framework 3.5 stuff with VS2005.

Sorry for incorrectly .. correcting you!

"Chris Dunaway" <dunaw...@gmail.comwrote in message

news:22**********************************@17g2000h sk.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 4:07 pm, "sloan" <sl...@ipass.netwrote:
appropriate .Net 3.0 bits. You need VS2008 if you wish to use C# 3.5
with features like LINQ.
3.5 = LINQ
There is no such thing as C# 3.5. The current version of C# is 3.0
and that is the version that adds LINQ and the other features. C# 3.0
goes along with the .Net framework 3.5.
Here is a link to an article about .Net versioning:
http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/Ch.../Versions.aspx
Chris
I was pretty sure that's what you meant. MS has muddied up the waters
with the way they have done their version numbers.

Chris
Oct 24 '08 #16
Bill McCormick wrote:
I'm began developing a client/server application in C#2.0. Do I gain
much by moving to 3.0?

One of the features that I'm just now getting my arms around is
Remoteing. Should I skip this and go right to the WCF?
If that client/server solution is expected to run for
many years, then going directly to WCF from the beginning
seems as a good strategic move.

Arne
Oct 26 '08 #17
Hi Bill,

Yes, as Gregory mentioned, vs 2008 can be installed with VS 2005 together
without any problem. Side by side is supported.

Sincerely,

Steven Cheng

Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead
Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at:
ms****@microsoft.com.

==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subs...#notifications
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

--------------------
>Message-ID: <49**************@newsgroup.nospam>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:42:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Cheng <st*****@online.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: .NET 3.0
>Steven Cheng wrote:
>Hi Bill,

If your application will need to adopt some districuted communication
components, on windows/.NET platform, WCF should be the preferred one.

For ram up, I think the get start section in MSDN is good which contains
some basic walkthroughss:

#Getting Started Tutorial
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms734712.aspx

Also, you can inspect the WCF samples from windows sdk:

http://blogs.msdn.com/dotnetinterop/...-samples-have-
>been-updated.aspx

In addition, you can always get many new articles on WCF official sites:

#Windows Communication Foundation home

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

http://netfx3.com/content/WCFHome.aspx

Thanks Steven. Would you please enlighten me on upgrading from VS 2005
to VS 2008? Is it recommended that 2005 be completely uninstalled first?

Thanks,

Bill
Oct 27 '08 #18

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

3
by: William C. White | last post by:
Does anyone know of a way to use PHP /w Authorize.net AIM without using cURL? Our website is hosted on a shared drive and the webhost company doesn't installed additional software (such as cURL)...
2
by: Albert Ahtenberg | last post by:
Hello, I don't know if it is only me but I was sure that header("Location:url") redirects the browser instantly to URL, or at least stops the execution of the code. But appearantely it continues...
3
by: James | last post by:
Hi, I have a form with 2 fields. 'A' 'B' The user completes one of the fields and the form is submitted. On the results page I want to run a query, but this will change subject to which...
0
by: Ollivier Robert | last post by:
Hello, I'm trying to link PHP with Oracle 9.2.0/OCI8 with gcc 3.2.3 on a Solaris9 system. The link succeeds but everytime I try to run php, I get a SEGV from inside the libcnltsh.so library. ...
1
by: Richard Galli | last post by:
I want viewers to compare state laws on a single subject. Imagine a three-column table with a drop-down box on the top. A viewer selects a state from the list, and that state's text fills the...
4
by: Albert Ahtenberg | last post by:
Hello, I have two questions. 1. When the user presses the back button and returns to a form he filled the form is reseted. How do I leave there the values he inserted? 2. When the...
1
by: inderjit S Gabrie | last post by:
Hi all Here is the scenerio ...is it possibly to do this... i am getting valid course dates output on to a web which i have designed ....all is okay so far , look at the following web url ...
2
by: Jack | last post by:
Hi All, What is the PHP equivilent of Oracle bind variables in a SQL statement, e.g. select x from y where z=:parameter Which in asp/jsp would be followed by some statements to bind a value...
3
by: Sandwick | last post by:
I am trying to change the size of a drawing so they are all 3x3. the script below is what i was trying to use to cut it in half ... I get errors. I can display the normal picture but not the...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
1
by: Defcon1945 | last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.