No need to get undies bundled. The underscore is a common prefixed notation
convention as is m_ which you can see Dino Esposito use as well as others
who picked up the habit to visually decorate text to give it a visual
property where the language itself and all other conventions lack such
characteristics. However while such conventions are cononical they are not
found in the official language specifications. Which is why people made them
up in the first place.
I was an architect and we use dozens of symbolic references to indicate type
in the same context as we do when decorating OOP. I've been wondering lately
how we will map them to the OOP objects they describe now that OOP has
become the defacto way to model objects.
"Arne Vajhøj" <ar**@vajhoej.dkwrote in message
news:48***********************@news.sunsite.dk...
Paul E Collins wrote:
>"Paul E Collins" <fi******************@CL4.orgwrote:
>>I've prepended an underscore to field names according to C# naming
conventions.
Curses, I was getting mixed up with something else, wasn't I? Apologies.
I don't think C# has any such convention.
Some people do use _ prefix, but it is not a majority.
Arne