implement interface

[Tony Johansson]

Hello!

Assume you have the following interface and classes shown below.

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface it
inherits.
Below we have class MyDerivedClass that inherits IMyInterface but
MyDerivedClass doesn't implement method DoSomething() it inherits it from
the base class MyBaseClass.
So the statement that a class must implement all method in an interface that
it inherits is not fully true as I see this matter.
Do you agree with me ?

public interface IMyInterface
{
void DoSomething();
void DoSomethingElse();
}

public class MyBaseClass
{
public void DoSomething() { }
}

public class MyDerivedClass : MyBaseClass, IMyInterface
{
public void DoSomethingElse() {}
}

//Tony

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Andersson?=]

Tony Johansson wrote:

Hello!

Assume you have the following interface and classes shown below.

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface it
inherits.
Below we have class MyDerivedClass that inherits IMyInterface but
MyDerivedClass doesn't implement method DoSomething() it inherits it from
the base class MyBaseClass.
So the statement that a class must implement all method in an interface that
it inherits is not fully true as I see this matter.
Do you agree with me ?

public interface IMyInterface
{
void DoSomething();
void DoSomethingElse();
}

public class MyBaseClass
{
public void DoSomething() { }
}

public class MyDerivedClass : MyBaseClass, IMyInterface
{
public void DoSomethingElse() {}
}

//Tony

The person writing that description probably didn't think of that
special case, or throught that it was more important to keep the
description simple, than to make it cover every possible aspect.
--
Göran Andersson
_____
http://www.guffa.com

[Scott M.]

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface it

inherits.

Well no. A class must implement all the methods of the interface it
"implements". Classes do not "inherit" interfaces. Implementation and
inheritance are not the same thing and thus, the source of your confusion.

MyDerivedClass doesn't have to implement DoSomething() because it is
inheriting the implementation of DoSomething() from the base class. It does
have to "implement" DoSomethingElse() because the class "implements" the
interface.

So, when a class "inherits" from a base class, it inherits all that the base
class has. When a class "implements" an interface it is entering into a
contract that requires that the entire interface be implemented.

-Scott

"Tony Johansson" <jo*****************@telia.comwrote in message
news:jh*****************@newsb.telia.net...

Hello!

Assume you have the following interface and classes shown below.

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface it
inherits.
Below we have class MyDerivedClass that inherits IMyInterface but
MyDerivedClass doesn't implement method DoSomething() it inherits it from
the base class MyBaseClass.
So the statement that a class must implement all method in an interface
that it inherits is not fully true as I see this matter.
Do you agree with me ?

public interface IMyInterface
{
void DoSomething();
void DoSomethingElse();
}

public class MyBaseClass
{
public void DoSomething() { }
}

public class MyDerivedClass : MyBaseClass, IMyInterface
{
public void DoSomethingElse() {}
}

//Tony

[Peter Duniho]

On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:57:19 -0700, Tony Johansson
<jo*****************@telia.comwrote:

Hello!

Assume you have the following interface and classes shown below.

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface
it
inherits.

It is said by whom? How do they define the term "implements"?

As Scott said, interfaces are _implemented_, not inherited. But even
ignoring that mistake in your terminology, it's perfectly reasonable to
say that a class that inherits some implementation does in fact in some
sense implement both the inherited implementation and new implementation.

Anyway, it's really hard to say one way or the other whether a specific
statement is accurate or not without you actually posting the statement
and the full context in which it was made.

Pete

[Hans Kesting]

Tony Johansson expressed precisely :

Hello!

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface it
inherits.

I think it depends on what you mean by "implement a method".

If it is strict "must physically define this method within this class",
then the above statement is false.

If it is the more broad "an instance of this class should have this
method, either directly or through inheritance", then the statement is
true. And your example would not violate it.

Hans Kesting

[Scott M.]

I think you're confusing things for the OP.

There really isn't (or shouldn't be) a dual meaning for "implements". A
method is implemented when a class provides functionality that the interface
requires and that functionality matches the name/signature that the
interface requires.

If a class inherits from a class that implements a method, the derived class
does not implement the method, but instead has an implementation of the
method.

In other words, implementation occurs at the level where the method is
provided to the class.

-Scott

"Hans Kesting" <ne*********@spamgourmet.comwrote in message
news:Oq**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Tony Johansson expressed precisely :

>Hello!

It is said that a class must implement all the methods in the interface
it inherits.

I think it depends on what you mean by "implement a method".

If it is strict "must physically define this method within this class",
then the above statement is false.

If it is the more broad "an instance of this class should have this
method, either directly or through inheritance", then the statement is
true. And your example would not violate it.

Hans Kesting