.NET 3.5 Runtime

[Peter Morris]

Is it true that to get the .NET 3.5 runtime onto a fresh XP installation
requires a 200MB download?

[Kerem Gümrükcü]

Hi Peter,

yes, the full redistributable 3.5 which includes the other runtimes that
the 3.5 depends on and some other stuff. And it is 197 MB in size.
Regards

Kerem
--
-----------------------
Beste Grüsse / Best regards / Votre bien devoue
Kerem Gümrükcü
ke*****@arcor.de

Best Quote: "Ain't nobody a badass with a double dose
of rock salt...", Kill Bill Vol.2

Microsoft Live Space: http://kerem-g.spaces.live.com/
Latest Open-Source Projects: http://entwicklung.junetz.de
Sign my guestbook: http://entwicklung.junetz.de/guestbook/
-----------------------
"This reply is provided as is, without warranty express or implied."

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Peter Morris <su*****@NOdroopySPAMeyes.comwrote:

Is it true that to get the .NET 3.5 runtime onto a fresh XP installation
requires a 200MB download?

It's not entirely clear. If you download the whole thing, it is indeed
that big. However, if you download the 2.5MB bootstrapper, it will only
download the bits it needs. For instance, I *guess* that it won't
bother downloading the 64 bit CLR if you're running on a 32 bit
machine.

When I installed it on an XP machine with .NET 2 on, it was only about
60MB after the initial bootstrap.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

[Peter Morris]

Hi John

Thanks, that is much more reassuring. There's no way I'd be developing .NET
3.5 apps if my users had to download 200MB first!
Pete

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Peter Morris <su*****@NOdroopySPAMeyes.comwrote:

Thanks, that is much more reassuring. There's no way I'd be developing .NET
3.5 apps if my users had to download 200MB first!

On the other hand, asking your users to run a bootstrap which will
first download 2.5MB and then download some more separately isn't too
appealing either.

Hopefully in the next few weeks or so we may get more clarity on this -
separate bundles for an offline installation for x86, x64, with or
without .NET 2.0 already installed etc. I'm somewhat in the dark too!

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

[Willy Denoyette [MVP]]

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.comwrote in message
news:MP*********************@msnews.microsoft.com. ..

Peter Morris <su*****@NOdroopySPAMeyes.comwrote:

>Thanks, that is much more reassuring. There's no way I'd be developing
.NET
3.5 apps if my users had to download 200MB first!

On the other hand, asking your users to run a bootstrap which will
first download 2.5MB and then download some more separately isn't too
appealing either.

Hopefully in the next few weeks or so we may get more clarity on this -
separate bundles for an offline installation for x86, x64, with or
without .NET 2.0 already installed etc. I'm somewhat in the dark too!

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

Required for 3.5 , are the 2.0 SP1 (3.5 can't live without this) and 3.0 SP1
frameworks, both are available as stand-alone downloads, but this doesn't
reduce the total download volume .

Willy.