He-he...

[Alexander Gorbylev]

Because

int remainder= (int)(Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder));

Right is:

Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder)
RectangleF[] fillRectangles = new RectangleF[(int)(MaxValue / 2) +
remainder];

Distraction on last degree and hurly-burly...

:-)

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

Please use a more descriptive subject next time, I though this was SPAM,
only when I saw your other post I realized you were "real"

"Alexander Gorbylev" <ag*****@hotmail.com.nospamwrote in message
news:e%******************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Because

>int remainder= (int)(Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder));

Right is:

Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder)
RectangleF[] fillRectangles = new RectangleF[(int)(MaxValue / 2) +
remainder];

Distraction on last degree and hurly-burly...

:-)

[Frans Bouma [C# MVP]]

Alexander Gorbylev wrote:

Because

int remainder= (int)(Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder));

Right is:

Math.DivRem(MaxValue, 2, out remainder)
RectangleF[] fillRectangles = new RectangleF[(int)(MaxValue / 2) +
remainder];

Distraction on last degree and hurly-burly...

WHy not use '%'? Makes the code more clearer than a call to DivRem,
which does practically the same.

FB

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------