Property Block Accessibility

[Mike Labosh]

In C# 2003, is there a way to phrase a property block so that the getter is
public and the setter is internal?

How about in 2005?

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD MCT
Owner, vbSensei.Com
"The power to query ADSI is a power only
one has achieved, but if we work together,
I know we can discover the secrets."
-- The Emperor

[Daniel Cigic]

You can't do it in 1.0 or 1.1 but you can do it 2.0.

"Mike Labosh" <mlabosh_at_hotmail_dot_comwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

In C# 2003, is there a way to phrase a property block so that the getter
is public and the setter is internal?

How about in 2005?

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD MCT
Owner, vbSensei.Com
"The power to query ADSI is a power only
one has achieved, but if we work together,
I know we can discover the secrets."
-- The Emperor

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

<"Mike Labosh" <mlabosh_at_hotmail_dot_com>wrote:

In C# 2003, is there a way to phrase a property block so that the getter is
public and the setter is internal?

How about in 2005?

Not in C# 1, I'm afraid. Fortunately this glaring omission was
corrected in C# 2:

int foo;
public int Foo
{
get { return foo; }
internal set { foo = value; }
}

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Mike Labosh]

Not in C# 1, I'm afraid. Fortunately this glaring omission was

corrected in C# 2:

int foo;
public int Foo
{
get { return foo; }
internal set { foo = value; }
}

Excellent. Thanks!
--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD MCT
Owner, vbSensei.Com
"The power to query ADSI is a power only
one has achieved, but if we work together,
I know we can discover the secrets."
-- The Emperor