Changing a list while iterating over its elements with a foreachloop

[Andreas Schmitt]

I am somewhat new to C# and I ran into a problem in a small program I am
writing for teaching myself.

I am handling a list ob objects and I want to delete some of them inside
a loop like in:

foreach (Object object in objList)
{
if (object.status() == deleted)
{
objList.remove(object);
}
}

The problem here is that the list is changed while iterating over its
elements. I know one could make this work in C++ because the remove
method of the C++ STL list template returned an iterator to the next
valid object of the list. Is there any equivalent or other elegant
solution to do something like this?
I have read through all documentation I could find about the list class
in the past two days but I didn't find anything and I don't have much
literature on C# yet either.

Any help would be appreciated.

[james]

System.Collections.Generic.List has a RemoveAll function:

List<objectlist = new List<object>();

Predicate<objectpred = delegate(object item) { return item.status ==
deleted; };
list.RemoveAll(pred);

-James

[Andreas Schmitt]

james schrieb:

System.Collections.Generic.List has a RemoveAll function:

List<objectlist = new List<object>();

Predicate<objectpred = delegate(object item) { return item.status ==
deleted; };
list.RemoveAll(pred);

Yes, but that only works if I just want to delete.. what if the foreach
loop contains stuff like this:

{
if (object.status() == deleted) do this

if (object.status() == something else) do this

..
..
..
}

See my problem? I kinda want to be able to do many things in one foreach
loop depending on a condition, including removing objects. I don't want
to have a seperate loop or command just to delete something from the
loop, I want to be able to do whatever is necessary depending on the
state within one single loop. Is that possible in C# with the List class?
I mean using the removeAll command as a seperate command before the
other loop is ok, but not the most elegant way to do it...

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

The problem here is that the list is changed while iterating over its
elements. I know one could make this work in C++ because the remove method
of the C++ STL list template returned an iterator to the next valid object
of the list. Is there any equivalent or other elegant solution to do
something like this?

You will have to keep track of the instances you need to remove and remove
them later on another loop:

ArrayList toDel = new ArrayList()
foreach (Object obj in objList)
{
if (obj.status() == deleted)
{
toDel.Add( obj)
}
}

foreach( Object obj in toDel )
objList.remove(obj);

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

"Andreas Schmitt" <ke**********@gmx.dewrote in message
news:f0*************@news.t-online.com...

james schrieb:

>
See my problem? I kinda want to be able to do many things in one foreach
loop depending on a condition, including removing objects. I don't want to
have a seperate loop or command just to delete something from the loop, I
want to be able to do whatever is necessary depending on the state within
one single loop. Is that possible in C# with the List class?
I mean using the removeAll command as a seperate command before the other
loop is ok, but not the most elegant way to do it...

You can modify the status of the instances. what You can not do is modify
the list

[=?Utf-8?B?aXdkdTE1?=]

the foreach loop uses an iterator, so if you were to remove an item from the
list, the iterator is no longer valid. to prevent errors or
unwanted/unexpected results, you cant remove items from a list your iterating
in a foreach loop.
--
-iwdu15

[RobinS]

You could try doing it backwards so it's not trying to access past the end
of the list. I think I actually used this somewhere, but I can't find it
right now, so maybe I didn't; I can't remember. Here's the theory. It's
free to try!

For (i = myList.Count-1; i < 0; i--)
if (obj[i].Status == deleted)
obj[i].remove();

Robin S.
---------------------

"Andreas Schmitt" <ke**********@gmx.dewrote in message
news:f0*************@news.t-online.com...

>I am somewhat new to C# and I ran into a problem in a small program I am
writing for teaching myself.

I am handling a list ob objects and I want to delete some of them inside
a loop like in:

foreach (Object object in objList)
{
if (object.status() == deleted)
{
objList.remove(object);
}
}

The problem here is that the list is changed while iterating over its
elements. I know one could make this work in C++ because the remove
method of the C++ STL list template returned an iterator to the next
valid object of the list. Is there any equivalent or other elegant
solution to do something like this?
I have read through all documentation I could find about the list class
in the past two days but I didn't find anything and I don't have much
literature on C# yet either.

Any help would be appreciated.

[Chris Dunaway]

On Apr 19, 1:21 am, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

>
For (i = myList.Count-1; i < 0; i--)
if (obj[i].Status == deleted)
obj[i].remove();

I think you mean

For (i = myList.Count-1; i 0, i--) //Note i 0

[Ben Voigt]

"Andreas Schmitt" <ke**********@gmx.dewrote in message
news:f0*************@news.t-online.com...

>I am somewhat new to C# and I ran into a problem in a small program I am
writing for teaching myself.

I am handling a list ob objects and I want to delete some of them inside a
loop like in:

foreach (Object object in objList)
{
if (object.status() == deleted)
{
objList.remove(object);
}
}

The problem here is that the list is changed while iterating over its
elements. I know one could make this work in C++ because the remove method
of the C++ STL list template returned an iterator to the next valid object
of the list. Is there any equivalent or other elegant solution to do
something like this?

C++ list is like .NET LinkedList
C++ vector is like .NET List

I have read through all documentation I could find about the list class in
the past two days but I didn't find anything and I don't have much
literature on C# yet either.

Any help would be appreciated.

[RobinS]

"Chris Dunaway" <du******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@b58g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...

On Apr 19, 1:21 am, "RobinS" <[e-mail]:

>>
For (i = myList.Count-1; i < 0; i--)
if (obj[i].Status == deleted)
obj[i].remove();

I think you mean

For (i = myList.Count-1; i 0, i--) //Note i 0

Thank you, you're right. I was thinking "Do Until" not "Do While". It was
really late when I posted that.

Robin