473,396 Members | 2,109 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,396 software developers and data experts.

32-bit .net 1.1 apps on Win2003 x64

I have a set of apps that require .net 1.1 framework. I've installed
them on Windows 2003 Server (x64) with the .net 2.0 (x64) framework. I
can't seem to find the x64 1.1 framework and the x86 .net 1.1 framework
refuses to install on win2003 x64. Is there such a thing as x64 1.1
framework? If not, is there a way to fool the apps into thinking that
the 1.1 framework is installed?

Regards
Jan 3 '07 #1
9 1488
Hi Frank,

Unfortunately, there is no x64 version for .NET framework 1.1. If this is a
..NET application, it should be working fine on .NET framework 2.0 for
backward compatibility, except for some break changes. You don't need to
fool the app, it will automatically running on .NET framework 2.0 runtime
if it detects that only .NET 2.0 is installed.

Also, you can specify the runtime version in your application's app.config
file with the following block:

<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727" />
</startup>
</configuration>

This is often used when 2 different versions of framework are installed on
one machine.

Here are some newgroup thread that you can reference on this issue.

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/Sho...60931&SiteID=1

http://groups.google.com/group/micro...es.vb/browse_t
hread/thread/ca379a50bb249700/bcecfce1f9190280?lnk=st&q=.net+1.1+app+run+on+
..net+2.0&rnum=2&hl=en#bcecfce1f9190280

If anything is unclear, please feel free to let me know.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support

==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

Jan 4 '07 #2
Kevin Yu [MSFT] wrote:
Hi Frank,

Unfortunately, there is no x64 version for .NET framework 1.1. If this is a
.NET application, it should be working fine on .NET framework 2.0 for
backward compatibility, except for some break changes. You don't need to
fool the app, it will automatically running on .NET framework 2.0 runtime
if it detects that only .NET 2.0 is installed.

Also, you can specify the runtime version in your application's app.config
file with the following block:

<configuration>
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727" />
</startup>
</configuration>
Well, that's part of the problem. There were some issues with running
the apps against .net 2.0. Thus the original authors required the 1.1
framework using the <requiredRuntime version="v1.1***"/>.

Regards
>
This is often used when 2 different versions of framework are installed on
one machine.

Here are some newgroup thread that you can reference on this issue.

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/Sho...60931&SiteID=1

http://groups.google.com/group/micro...es.vb/browse_t
hread/thread/ca379a50bb249700/bcecfce1f9190280?lnk=st&q=.net+1.1+app+run+on+
.net+2.0&rnum=2&hl=en#bcecfce1f9190280

If anything is unclear, please feel free to let me know.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support

==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...ult.aspx#notif
ications.
Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscripti...t/default.aspx.
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)
Jan 4 '07 #3
Hi Frank,

Does this app touch the break changes in .NET 2.0. Since only .NET
framework 2.0 is supported on x64 OS, in this case, it seems that we cannot
run it on x64 OS.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

Jan 4 '07 #4
Kevin Yu [MSFT] wrote:
Hi Frank,

Does this app touch the break changes in .NET 2.0. Since only .NET
framework 2.0 is supported on x64 OS, in this case, it seems that we cannot
run it on x64 OS.
Yep, that's essentially the crux of the problem.

Regards
Jan 4 '07 #5
Hi Frank,

Could you let me know why the app sticks to .NET framework 1.1? If it is
running on 2.0 is there any problem there? If we can find and fix the
problem, we may try to make the app run on .NET 2.0.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

Jan 5 '07 #6
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:40:46 -0800, Frank Rizzo <no**@none.comwrote:
>I have a set of apps that require .net 1.1 framework. I've installed
them on Windows 2003 Server (x64) with the .net 2.0 (x64) framework. I
can't seem to find the x64 1.1 framework and the x86 .net 1.1 framework
refuses to install on win2003 x64. Is there such a thing as x64 1.1
framework? If not, is there a way to fool the apps into thinking that
the 1.1 framework is installed?
Frank,
I'm running XP x64, which is the same code base as Windows Server 2003
x64, and .NET 1.1 apps run fine on this machine, as .NET 1.1 is
supported on the x64 platform. See
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en

so I'm not sure what's going on with your system.

Austin
Jan 5 '07 #7
Sorry, Frank.But it just come to mind that if you're using the Windows 2003
x64 edtion, the .NET framework 1.1 has already integrated with the
operating system. You can try to check if it has been installed throught
Add/Remove Programs|Add/Remove Windows components.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

Jan 5 '07 #8
Kevin Yu [MSFT] wrote:
Sorry, Frank.But it just come to mind that if you're using the Windows 2003
x64 edtion, the .NET framework 1.1 has already integrated with the
operating system. You can try to check if it has been installed throught
Add/Remove Programs|Add/Remove Windows components.
Ok, here is the deal. It turns out that 1.1 framework won't install on
the plain vanilla Windows 2003 x64. However, if you install Win2003 R2
on top of it, the .net 1.1 framework happily installs (after giving an
IIS partial incompatibility warning).

So it seems to work ok now.
>
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)
Jan 5 '07 #9
Hi Frank,

It was nice to know that you have had the problem resolved. Thanks for
sharing your experience with all the people here. If you have any
questions, please feel free to post them in the community.

Kevin Yu
Microsoft Online Community Support
==================================================

(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

Jan 8 '07 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

20
by: Ivar | last post by:
Hi, For my supprise I found that functions have 32 parameter limit. Where to find more info about this limitation or similar limitations ? I need at least 50, 100 would be ok. Real life...
5
by: Ian Rutherford | last post by:
Heya guys, It seems VB .net no longer supports the awesome ability of VB 6 to declare something as a string and specify how long the string would be all in one line: Public myString as String *...
6
by: barcaroller | last post by:
I couldn't find a message-digest newsgroup, so I posted here. I have a C function that converts a string of arbitrary length to a 32-bit hash value. I realize this is overkill but I used...
9
by: beni.cherniavsky | last post by:
Python seems to be missing a UCS-32 codec, even in wide builds (not that it the build should matter). Is there some deep reason or should I just contribute a patch? If it's just a bug, should I...
16
by: chandanlinster | last post by:
As far as I know floating point variables, that are declared as float follow IEEE format representation (which is 32-bit in size). But chapter1-page no 9 of the book "The C programming language"...
10
by: lesperancer | last post by:
you start with a small application in access97, then you have more modules and more... and you reach the point where tables like 'item' and 'employee' reach the limit and you know there's more...
3
by: Barry | last post by:
void func(int array) { for (int i = 0; i < 32; ++i) cout << array << ' '; } as the code above shows, I know int array here will decay into int *, but I still find the number 32 useful for...
2
by: Jeffrey Walton | last post by:
Hi All, BMP Strings are a subset of Universal Strings.The BMP string uses approximately 65,000 code points from Universal String encoding. BMP Strings: ISO/IEC 10646, 2-octet canonical form,...
6
by: docbook.xml | last post by:
I have the following in the XHTML 1.0 Strict page: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-32" /> However W3 validator complains that "The character encoding specified in...
18
by: lak | last post by:
I am studying the Advanced programming in the unix environment. There they says that we can register upto 32 functions with atexit(). Why that is limited to 32 functions? can any one tell the...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.