Why is LinkedList lacking so much?

[Steve]

I just realized that I need elements in my List<> to be doubly linked. So I
searched for "C# Linked List" and found the LinkedList<> class. I was happy
until I looked at the docs for this class and realized that it's missing so
much. For example, Find(predicate), operator[], etc

Is there a reason for this other than MS didn't have time to add some of the
nice stuff from list<> to LinkedList<> or am I missing something?

I will just handle the links myself by changing my class to have a previous
and next reference, but what a shame.

[Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]]

Steve,

You could always use a List<T> in a linked list. Granted, the
performance profiles are different for certain operations, but if it suits
your needs, and the performance is acceptable, then by all means, use a
List.

You might also find some open source implementations of a doubly linked
list out there as well.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Steve" <sk**@skle.com> wrote in message
news:Om**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

I just realized that I need elements in my List<> to be doubly linked. So
I searched for "C# Linked List" and found the LinkedList<> class. I was
happy until I looked at the docs for this class and realized that it's
missing so much. For example, Find(predicate), operator[], etc

Is there a reason for this other than MS didn't have time to add some of
the nice stuff from list<> to LinkedList<> or am I missing something?

I will just handle the links myself by changing my class to have a
previous and next reference, but what a shame.

[Steve]

Thanks Nicholas,

I guess I was just mostly confused why LinkedList<> didn't have operator[]
as this would make my change from a List<> to a LinkedList<> quite involved.

I will check out CodeProject and see what they have ;)
Have a good weekend,
Steve

"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:Of**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Steve,

You could always use a List<T> in a linked list. Granted, the
performance profiles are different for certain operations, but if it suits
your needs, and the performance is acceptable, then by all means, use a
List.

You might also find some open source implementations of a doubly linked
list out there as well.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Steve" <sk**@skle.com> wrote in message
news:Om**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

I just realized that I need elements in my List<> to be doubly linked. So
I searched for "C# Linked List" and found the LinkedList<> class. I was
happy until I looked at the docs for this class and realized that it's
missing so much. For example, Find(predicate), operator[], etc

Is there a reason for this other than MS didn't have time to add some of
the nice stuff from list<> to LinkedList<> or am I missing something?

I will just handle the links myself by changing my class to have a
previous and next reference, but what a shame.