Creating object but not using the standart way :(

[CreateObject]

Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
....
}

class ford: IAuto{
....
}

class audi: IAuto{
....
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just using
strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return mercedes
object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

[Bruce Wood]

Look into the Reflection namespace. Reflection allows you to create
objects and invoke their properties, methods, etc. where their types
are not known at compile time.

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

HI,
Of course :)

Take a look at CreateInstance method, two classes implement it, AppDomain &
Activator , depending of what you have ( assembly where they were defined,
complete name, etc) you can use either one.
--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
...
}

class ford: IAuto{
...
}

class audi: IAuto{
...
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just using
strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return mercedes
object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

[CreateObject]

Thanx for your rapid answers :)
However, I got the following error :(

System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'NameSpaceThing.Class1' from
assembly 'App_Web_xcjnboz6, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null'.
Class1 myCla1 = new Class1();
//works fine
object px = Activator.CreateInstance(null, "NameSpaceThing.Class1");
//throws error

namespace NameSpaceThing
{
public class Class1
{
public Class1()
{

}
}
}


"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us>, haber
iletisinde þunlarý yazdý:ut**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

HI,
Of course :)

Take a look at CreateInstance method, two classes implement it, AppDomain
& Activator , depending of what you have ( assembly where they were
defined, complete name, etc) you can use either one.
--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
...
}

class ford: IAuto{
...
}

class audi: IAuto{
...
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just using
strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return mercedes
object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

Is the code in the same assembly where you define your class?
from the error message it seems not.

what if you call it like:
object px = Activator.CreateInstance( "NameSpaceThing" , "Class1");

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eB**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Thanx for your rapid answers :)
However, I got the following error :(

System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'NameSpaceThing.Class1' from
assembly 'App_Web_xcjnboz6, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null'.
Class1 myCla1 = new Class1(); //works fine
object px = Activator.CreateInstance(null, "NameSpaceThing.Class1");
//throws error

namespace NameSpaceThing
{
public class Class1
{
public Class1()
{

}
}
}


"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us>,
haber iletisinde þunlarý yazdý:ut**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

HI,
Of course :)

Take a look at CreateInstance method, two classes implement it, AppDomain
& Activator , depending of what you have ( assembly where they were
defined, complete name, etc) you can use either one.
--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
...
}

class ford: IAuto{
...
}

class audi: IAuto{
...
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just
using strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return
mercedes object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

[CreateObject]

My class is not in the same assembly where I call Activator.CreateInstance()
method.

these are differen classed stored in different files under different paths
Default.cs
namespace NameSpaceThing
{
public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page
{
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Class1 objCls = new Class1();
object px = Activator.CreateInstance(null,
"NameSpaceThing.Class1");
}
}
}

and my class Class1.cs

namespace NameSpaceThing
{
public class Class1
{
public Class1()
{
...
}
}
}

I also tried what you've suggested but nothing has changed
again :(
"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us>, haber
iletisinde þunlarý yazdý:OO**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Is the code in the same assembly where you define your class?
from the error message it seems not.

what if you call it like:
object px = Activator.CreateInstance( "NameSpaceThing" , "Class1");

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eB**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Thanx for your rapid answers :)
However, I got the following error :(

System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'NameSpaceThing.Class1'
from assembly 'App_Web_xcjnboz6, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null'.
Class1 myCla1 = new Class1(); //works fine
object px = Activator.CreateInstance(null, "NameSpaceThing.Class1");
//throws error

namespace NameSpaceThing
{
public class Class1
{
public Class1()
{

}
}
}


"Ignacio Machin ( .NET/ C# MVP )" <ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us>,
haber iletisinde þunlarý yazdý:ut**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

HI,
Of course :)

Take a look at CreateInstance method, two classes implement it,
AppDomain & Activator , depending of what you have ( assembly where they
were defined, complete name, etc) you can use either one.
--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
...
}

class ford: IAuto{
...
}

class audi: IAuto{
...
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just
using strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return
mercedes object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford
one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

[Nick Hounsome]

"CreateObject" <ha*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Assume that I have the classes below;

class mercedes: IAuto {
...
}

class ford: IAuto{
...
}

class audi: IAuto{
...
}

Is it possible to create objects derived from these classes by just using
strings. In other words, CreateObject("mercedes") will return mercedes
object and so CreateObject("ford") will give me the ford one...

It is important for me that the way you are suggesting must not use the
conditional things like if or switch.
How can I do that?

Thanks.

A lot of people are going to tell you how to do this with reflection but,
except when using plugins, reflection is not necessary and should be avoided
wherever possible for security, maintainability and correctness reasons.

You can avoid switch statements by using a dictionary to look up a delegate
to construct the appropriate object.

Of course the dictionary has to be built explicitly but at least you know
that you are not going to get a security exception and you know and can
control exactly what can and cannot be instantiated.