compiling

[RobcPettit]

hi, couls somebody have a look at this code and advise me were im going
wrong, im getting errors like with the first { but if i try to alter
this then the if's through up errors. It is part of other code but each
of the other regions have no errors. I am a complete beginner so Im
sorry if I ve missed something obvious.
#region Private methods
/*** Check header is valid**/
private bool IsAValidHeader(string minorErrorCode, APIResponseHeader
header);
{
bool rtn = true;
if (minorErrorCode != null)

{
errorMessage = "Minor error code; " + minorErrorCode;

}

if (header.minorErrorCode != null);

{
errorMessage = "Minor error code" + header.minorErrorCode;
}

if (header.errorCode != APIErrorEnum.OK);

{
errorMessage = "Header error" + header.errorCode.ToString();
rtn = false;
}

return rtn;
}

#endregion

Regards Robert

[Göran Andersson]

Remove ; after the method header.

Ro********@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

hi, couls somebody have a look at this code and advise me were im going
wrong, im getting errors like with the first { but if i try to alter
this then the if's through up errors. It is part of other code but each
of the other regions have no errors. I am a complete beginner so Im
sorry if I ve missed something obvious.
#region Private methods
/*** Check header is valid**/
private bool IsAValidHeader(string minorErrorCode, APIResponseHeader
header);
{
bool rtn = true;
if (minorErrorCode != null)

{
errorMessage = "Minor error code; " + minorErrorCode;

}

if (header.minorErrorCode != null);

{
errorMessage = "Minor error code" + header.minorErrorCode;
}

if (header.errorCode != APIErrorEnum.OK);

{
errorMessage = "Header error" + header.errorCode.ToString();
rtn = false;
}

return rtn;
}

#endregion

Regards Robert

[RobcPettit]

Thankyou very much for your reply, that has solved the errors. Is this
the norm for method headers.
Regards Robert

[Göran Andersson]

Ro********@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Thankyou very much for your reply, that has solved the errors. Is this
the norm for method headers.
Regards Robert

Yes. A method definition looks like this:

modifiers type name(parameters) { code }

not:

modifiers type name(parameters); { code }