Reflection ?

[Jarod]

Hi
I have let's say 10 classes and I need a function that will call a method on
them. But this method name is the same in each of this class. For this
method class can be initiated by constructor without params. Is there a
simple way to invoke Delete() function in a given class just by giving it
name ? Other than using reflection ?
Function will look like this:
void deleteSomeThing(string className)
{
// some code that will do : className.Delete();
}
Jarod

[Aboulfazl Hadi]

Hi Jarod
I think it is better to use polymorphism ( by interface or by
inheritance) to invoking a method with different implementation.

I hope this helps
A.Hadi

[Tim Wilson]

Are you looking to call the Delete method against an object or the class
itself? In other words, is the Delete method static?

--
Tim Wilson
..NET Compact Framework MVP

"Jarod" <bl*****@NOSPAM.gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Hi
I have let's say 10 classes and I need a function that will call a method on them. But this method name is the same in each of this class. For this
method class can be initiated by constructor without params. Is there a
simple way to invoke Delete() function in a given class just by giving it
name ? Other than using reflection ?
Function will look like this:
void deleteSomeThing(string className)
{
// some code that will do : className.Delete();
}
Jarod

[vj]

I don't think so, to my knowledge.. Would be interested in knowing if there
is any available

VJ

"Jarod" <bl*****@NOSPAM.gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Hi
I have let's say 10 classes and I need a function that will call a method
on them. But this method name is the same in each of this class. For this
method class can be initiated by constructor without params. Is there a
simple way to invoke Delete() function in a given class just by giving it
name ? Other than using reflection ?
Function will look like this:
void deleteSomeThing(string className)
{
// some code that will do : className.Delete();
}
Jarod

[Jarod]

> Are you looking to call the Delete method against an object or the class

itself? In other words, is the Delete method static?

--

It can be if it makes diffrence ;) Or makes it easier ;)
Jarod

[Tim Wilson]

From the code that you posted (which may have been pseudo code) it makes it
look like it could be a static method. I wasn't sure. I was actually
thinking that if you're using objects then this would be a classic use of
polymorphism. Or, for some reason, do you only have the name of the class as
a string?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...52(VS.80).aspx

private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
DerivedClassA a = new DerivedClassA();
DerivedClassB b = new DerivedClassB();
Delete(a);
Delete(b);
}

private void Delete(BaseClass c)
{
c.Delete();
}

....

public abstract class BaseClass : System.Object
{
public virtual void Delete()
{
}
}

public class DerivedClassA : BaseClass
{
public override void Delete()
{
MessageBox.Show(this.ToString());
}
}

public class DerivedClassB : BaseClass
{
public override void Delete()
{
MessageBox.Show(this.ToString());
}
}

--
Tim Wilson
..NET Compact Framework MVP

"Jarod" <bl*****@NOSPAM.gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:uG*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Are you looking to call the Delete method against an object or the class
itself? In other words, is the Delete method static?

--

It can be if it makes diffrence ;) Or makes it easier ;)
Jarod

[Jarod]

> From the code that you posted (which may have been pseudo code) it makes

it
look like it could be a static method. I wasn't sure. I was actually
thinking that if you're using objects then this would be a classic use of
polymorphism. Or, for some reason, do you only have the name of the class
as
a string?

There is 10 really diffrent classes but they have one common thing ;) The
delete funcion ;) And I chose to invoke it by late binding ;) Just to learn
something new.
Jarod

[Tim Wilson]

If all the classes share a common custom base class then you can use the
polymorphic approach. You could also define an interface and have all the
classes implement that interface to force the implementation of a Delete
method. Either way what you'd be trying to do is guarantee that the object
that is passed to the method has a Delete method. Otherwise, you'd need to
use reflection to look up if the type of the object passed into the method
actually has a Delete method that can be invoked.

--
Tim Wilson
..NET Compact Framework MVP

"Jarod" <bl*****@NOSPAM.gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:e5**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

From the code that you posted (which may have been pseudo code) it makes
it
look like it could be a static method. I wasn't sure. I was actually
thinking that if you're using objects then this would be a classic use of polymorphism. Or, for some reason, do you only have the name of the class as
a string?
There is 10 really diffrent classes but they have one common thing ;) The
delete funcion ;) And I chose to invoke it by late binding ;) Just to

learn something new.
Jarod

[Robbe Morris [C# MVP]]

ASP.NET 2.0 - Safely Compile And Execute Source Code Dynamically

If I'm not mistaken, this can be adapted to 1.1 as well.

http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/...de_runtime.asp

--
Robbe Morris - 2004-2006 Microsoft MVP C#
Earn money answering .NET questions
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forums/merit.asp

"Jarod" <bl*****@NOSPAM.gazeta.pl> wrote in message
news:e5**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

From the code that you posted (which may have been pseudo code) it makes
it
look like it could be a static method. I wasn't sure. I was actually
thinking that if you're using objects then this would be a classic use of
polymorphism. Or, for some reason, do you only have the name of the class
as
a string?

There is 10 really diffrent classes but they have one common thing ;) The
delete funcion ;) And I chose to invoke it by late binding ;) Just to
learn something new.
Jarod