Yes Nicholas, just when reading (and learnig) .NET 2.0 Generics, it comes to
the explaination and dynamics of List<T> and Dictionary<K,V> after a quick
explaination of CollectionBase and DictionaryBase, and why the use of these
base classes would not necessarily depreciate, but becaome less frequent in
their implementation\usage and, demonstrates why and how their
implementation is relevent to less specific cases.
Just a bit exctied about it all Nicholas, it's all too good. Take good care
and Merry Christamas.
- SpotNet
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:en**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
: SpotNet,
:
: Why would you want to use CollectionBase and DictionaryBase in .NET
2.0?
: Unless you had some special processing that needs to occur on
: add/remove/retreival, you should just use List<T> and Dictionary<K,V>.
:
: Hope this helps.
:
:
: --
: - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
: -
mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
:
: "SpotNet" <Sp*****@msnews.grp> wrote in message
: news:ue*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
: >
: > There are in a Book "Professional .NET 2.0 Generics" by Wrox
publications.
: > I
: > this because on reading this it seems like a very good idea to
undersatnd
: > CollectionBase and DictionaryBase with Generics in mind. It would be
: > better
: > to read this as there's not too much reading but you'll see how much
: > better
: > CollectionBase and DictionayBase are due to Generics.
: >
: > Or even a book with similar content. Professional C# 2005 by Wrox
: > publication also gets into it.
: >
: > - SpotNet
: >
: >
: > "Vivek Sharma" <vi********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
: > news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
: > : Hi,
: > :
: > : Does anyone know a good example that demonstrates the working of
: > : CollectionsBase and DictionaryBase in vs 2005?
: > :
: > : THanks
: > :
: > : Vivek
: > :
: > :
: >
: >
:
:
