473,386 Members | 1,819 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,386 software developers and data experts.

Coding an application to be single instance?

I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there should
only be one instance of this program running at any given time. The
"AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to prevent
multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away from coding
for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a Win3.x
application, I seem to remember being able to simply state somewhere whether
the program would or would not be a multiple-instance program and away you
went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The only information I've
been able to find involves a bit of coding where a an 'App' class has to be
derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think about just running through
the currently running processes and comparing process handles. There must
be a simple straight forward way to accomplish this, yeah?

Dec 2 '05 #1
7 1918
Jeffery,

Are you running .NET 1.1 or 2.0?

If you are running 1.1 or before, then you will have to use a mutex to
limit access. Basically, you will create a unique name for your mutex (the
assembly qualified name of the type that has the entry point to your program
will do nicely).

Then, before you call the static Run method with the Application class,
you would try and get ownership with this Mutex. If you can, then you run
the app, if you can't, you simply exit out.

In .NET 2.0, it is significantly easier. All you have to do is create a
class that derives from WindowsFormsApplicationBase in the
Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace. In the constructor, you set the
IsSingleInstance property to true, and then set the MainForm property to an
instance of your form.

Then, in your entry point, call the Run method on an instance of your
derived class, and viola, single instance semantics.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Jeffery Tyree" <Je***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ot*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there
should only be one instance of this program running at any given time.
The "AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to
prevent multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away
from coding for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a
Win3.x application, I seem to remember being able to simply state somewhere
whether the program would or would not be a multiple-instance program and
away you went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The only
information I've been able to find involves a bit of coding where a an
'App' class has to be derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think
about just running through the currently running processes and comparing
process handles. There must be a simple straight forward way to accomplish
this, yeah?

Dec 2 '05 #2
Two ways that I can see.

1) Use some form of mutex flag such as a local file that is opened for
exclusive read. Then the next instance would try to open that file and get
an error so you know some other instance is working.
2) Use the Process.GetProcessesByName and close the app if more than one
instance is returned. Have never done this but I would think it would work.

"Jeffery Tyree" <Je***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ot*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there
should only be one instance of this program running at any given time.
The "AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to
prevent multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away
from coding for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a
Win3.x application, I seem to remember being able to simply state somewhere
whether the program would or would not be a multiple-instance program and
away you went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The only
information I've been able to find involves a bit of coding where a an
'App' class has to be derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think
about just running through the currently running processes and comparing
process handles. There must be a simple straight forward way to accomplish
this, yeah?

Dec 2 '05 #3
Whatever you do, do NOT go with #2. It is incredibly inefficient, and
not accurate, either.

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Peter Rilling" <pe***@nospam.rilling.net> wrote in message
news:eV**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Two ways that I can see.

1) Use some form of mutex flag such as a local file that is opened for
exclusive read. Then the next instance would try to open that file and
get an error so you know some other instance is working.
2) Use the Process.GetProcessesByName and close the app if more than one
instance is returned. Have never done this but I would think it would
work.

"Jeffery Tyree" <Je***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ot*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there
should only be one instance of this program running at any given time. The
"AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to prevent
multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away from
coding for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a
Win3.x application, I seem to remember being able to simply state
somewhere whether the program would or would not be a multiple-instance
program and away you went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The
only information I've been able to find involves a bit of coding where a
an 'App' class has to be derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think
about just running through the currently running processes and comparing
process handles. There must be a simple straight forward way to
accomplish this, yeah?


Dec 2 '05 #4
VB? What a shame they don't have this for C#. Such a system should be part
of the core library.

I never thought I would say it, but VB seems to have some constructs that C#
should have.
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:u0**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
Jeffery,

Are you running .NET 1.1 or 2.0?

If you are running 1.1 or before, then you will have to use a mutex to
limit access. Basically, you will create a unique name for your mutex
(the assembly qualified name of the type that has the entry point to your
program will do nicely).

Then, before you call the static Run method with the Application class,
you would try and get ownership with this Mutex. If you can, then you run
the app, if you can't, you simply exit out.

In .NET 2.0, it is significantly easier. All you have to do is create
a class that derives from WindowsFormsApplicationBase in the
Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace. In the constructor, you set the
IsSingleInstance property to true, and then set the MainForm property to
an instance of your form.

Then, in your entry point, call the Run method on an instance of your
derived class, and viola, single instance semantics.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Jeffery Tyree" <Je***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ot*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there
should only be one instance of this program running at any given time. The
"AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to prevent
multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away from
coding for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a
Win3.x application, I seem to remember being able to simply state
somewhere whether the program would or would not be a multiple-instance
program and away you went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The
only information I've been able to find involves a bit of coding where a
an 'App' class has to be derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think
about just running through the currently running processes and comparing
process handles. There must be a simple straight forward way to
accomplish this, yeah?


Dec 2 '05 #5
Here's the details of the solution Nicholas mentioned - it's actually
extracted from one of our test conversions of a VB 2005 project and
reproduces the VB "application framework" defaults:

namespace YourRootNamespace
{
namespace My
{

internal partial class MyApplication :
Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.WindowsF ormsApplicationBase
{

[global::System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()]
public MyApplication() :
base(Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.Aut henticationMode.Windows)
{
this.IsSingleInstance = false;
this.EnableVisualStyles = true;
this.SaveMySettingsOnExit = true;
this.ShutdownStyle =
Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.Shutdown Mode.AfterMainFormCloses;
}

[global::System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()]
protected override void OnCreateMainForm()
{
this.MainForm = new global::YourRootNamespace.YourForm();
}

[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
MyApplication MyApp = new MyApplication();
MyApp.Run(args);
}

}
}

} //end of root namespace

--
David Anton
www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com
Instant C#: VB.NET to C# Converter
Instant VB: C# to VB.NET Converter
Instant C++: C# to C++ Converter
Instant J#: VB.NET to J# Converter

"Jeffery Tyree" wrote:
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there should
only be one instance of this program running at any given time. The
"AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to prevent
multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away from coding
for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a Win3.x
application, I seem to remember being able to simply state somewhere whether
the program would or would not be a multiple-instance program and away you
went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The only information I've
been able to find involves a bit of coding where a an 'App' class has to be
derived from UserApplicationContext. I did think about just running through
the currently running processes and comparing process handles. There must
be a simple straight forward way to accomplish this, yeah?

Dec 2 '05 #6
I don't even see it as that. Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll is distributed
with the framework standard, and to me, an assembly is an assembly is an
assembly...

I would expect the WPF to have this baked-in though. It won't matter at
that point.

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Peter Rilling" <pe***@nospam.rilling.net> wrote in message
news:eQ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
VB? What a shame they don't have this for C#. Such a system should be
part of the core library.

I never thought I would say it, but VB seems to have some constructs that
C# should have.
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote
in message news:u0**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
Jeffery,

Are you running .NET 1.1 or 2.0?

If you are running 1.1 or before, then you will have to use a mutex to
limit access. Basically, you will create a unique name for your mutex
(the assembly qualified name of the type that has the entry point to your
program will do nicely).

Then, before you call the static Run method with the Application
class, you would try and get ownership with this Mutex. If you can, then
you run the app, if you can't, you simply exit out.

In .NET 2.0, it is significantly easier. All you have to do is create
a class that derives from WindowsFormsApplicationBase in the
Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace. In the constructor, you set the
IsSingleInstance property to true, and then set the MainForm property to
an instance of your form.

Then, in your entry point, call the Run method on an instance of your
derived class, and viola, single instance semantics.

Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com

"Jeffery Tyree" <Je***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Ot*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I am writing an application in C#.NET that is "AlwaysOnTop" and there
should only be one instance of this program running at any given time.
The "AlwaysOnTop" piece is working just fine but I need to know how to
prevent multiple instances of this program from running. I've been away
from coding for quite a while... Back in the old day with k&r C writing a
Win3.x application, I seem to remember being able to simply state
somewhere whether the program would or would not be a multiple-instance
program and away you went. Does such an easy parameter still exist? The
only information I've been able to find involves a bit of coding where a
an 'App' class has to be derived from UserApplicationContext. I did
think about just running through the currently running processes and
comparing process handles. There must be a simple straight forward way
to accomplish this, yeah?



Dec 2 '05 #7
Thanks for all the suggestions and samples of code. In the end I opted for
the quickest and easiest way out; creating / checking for existing mutex
object.

-Jeff
Dec 6 '05 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

9
by: MrSpock | last post by:
1. Create a new Windows Application project. 2. Open the project properties and check "Make single instance application". 3. Build. 4. Go to the release folder and run the application. 5. Try to...
3
by: Michel | last post by:
Hi, I wrote an app in .Net and I whant only 1 instance of this app open for the user; the user open my app, do some works and try to open another instance of my app, I whant to show a message to...
17
by: M.Siler | last post by:
I'm trying to get my head around a conversation I had with a developer the other day. We were talking about Codesmith vs. Hand coding. He's position is Codesmith is for junior to mid level...
19
by: auratius | last post by:
http://www.auratius.co.za/CSharpCodingStandards.html Complete CSharp Coding Standards 1. Naming Conventions and Styles 2. Coding Practices 3. Project Settings and Project Structure 4....
2
by: pamela fluente | last post by:
I have an application running. A file type is registered with this application. When the user click on a file of such type a new instance of the application is loaded with command line (file name)....
4
by: Dave | last post by:
I have a global.asax file with Application_Start defined and create some static data there and in another module used in the asp.net application and I realize that static data is shared amongst...
5
by: Frank Moyles | last post by:
I am a developer with many years (approx 10years) development experience using C++ for DESKTOP applications. I am writing a web application using C#, and I wanted to ask a question about...
3
by: =?Utf-8?B?Um9nZXIgVHJhbmNoZXo=?= | last post by:
Hello, I would like to know the best way to install an clickonce in .net 3.5 (we use LINQ 8-D) published application on terminal server 2003 Do I have to install it on EVERY user that will use...
3
by: Joseph Geretz | last post by:
I'm implementing a web application whose purpose in life is to act as a data conduit. Data is posted to my Web app in XML format, my application examines the data and forwards it onward by posting...
0
by: taylorcarr | last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
0
by: aa123db | last post by:
Variable and constants Use var or let for variables and const fror constants. Var foo ='bar'; Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar'; Functions function $name$ ($parameters$) { } ...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.