Events between threads?

while (true)
..
and it takes 50% of cpu all time!

I have to keep worker process inside while statement:
while (true)
..
and it takes 50% of cpu all time!

just call Thread.Sleep(...) inside the loop. this should help.
Wiktor Zychla

is this the way e.g. windows waits for process to finish?

no, Thread.Sleep is not the way to wait for the worker thread to finish.

if the only purpose of the while () {...} loop is to wait for worker threads
then use the System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitAll() method.
read the docs for further info on this method.

Wiktor Zychla

so i need to create very dynamic ThreadPool,
When ever any thread finish a job , Main Thread has to take the result,
then
inserts new thread , and so on,
But as i see in this example:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/9...us,vs.80).aspx

1- array of WaitHandle must be decalred. Which very bad for my problem
2- I want to wait for each [ NOT FOR ALL, NOT FOR ANY] thread to finish
to
process its result and create new thread.

I Hope u can help me further.
Thanks agian.

I have unlimited number of processes [broadcast]
so i need to create very dynamic ThreadPool,
When ever any thread finish a job , Main Thread has to take the result,
then
inserts new thread , and so on,
But as i see in this example:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/9...us,vs.80).aspx

1- array of WaitHandle must be decalred. Which very bad for my problem
2- I want to wait for each [ NOT FOR ALL, NOT FOR ANY] thread to finish
to
process its result and create new thread.

I Hope u can help me further.
Thanks agian.

I see two possible routes you could try:
a) use one of thread synchronization objects, a mutex or an event to sync
the threads
b) use async delegates with async notifications (delegate.BeginInvoke( new
AsyncCallback( notification_routine ), ... ).

The latter solution could be an option when async operations should return
values for further processing. By using async delegates, you avoid dealing
with threads at all.

Wiktor Zychla