Base class:
class AssetBase
{
string _clli;
public string CLLI
{
get
{
return _clli;
}
set
{
_clli = value
}
}
}
In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class property
and internally refer the base class property like below
class Asset: BaseAsset
{
public string Location
{
get
{
base.CLLI;
}
set
{
base.CLLI = value;
}
}
}
Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset
instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see them
is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected ,
but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer
as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ?
Thanks
baski 7 6583
Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In
the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with
another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing
the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by
the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very
likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message
news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Base class:
class AssetBase { string _clli;
public string CLLI { get { return _clli; } set { _clli = value } }
}
In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class property and internally refer the base class property like below
class Asset: BaseAsset { public string Location { get { base.CLLI; } set { base.CLLI = value; } } } Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see them is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected , but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ?
Thanks baski
Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each
client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be
used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most
functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client
with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want
the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class
instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks
Baski
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message
news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Base class:
class AssetBase { string _clli;
public string CLLI { get { return _clli; } set { _clli = value } }
}
In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class property and internally refer the base class property like below
class Asset: BaseAsset { public string Location { get { base.CLLI; } set { base.CLLI = value; } } } Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see them is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected , but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ?
Thanks baski
Ah, now I understand.
When you rename the properties, do you need the originals to be unusable by
the user/developer, or do you just want them not to show up in the
"properties" window of the designer?
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks Baski "Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Base class:
class AssetBase { string _clli;
public string CLLI { get { return _clli; } set { _clli = value } }
}
In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class property and internally refer the base class property like below
class Asset: BaseAsset { public string Location { get { base.CLLI; } set { base.CLLI = value; } } } Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see them is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected , but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ?
Thanks baski
If any properties is renamed in derived class I want to mask that
propoerty from developer derived class instance(just like Explicit interface
implementation hide).
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message
news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Ah, now I understand.
When you rename the properties, do you need the originals to be unusable by the user/developer, or do you just want them not to show up in the "properties" window of the designer?
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks Baski "Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Base class:
class AssetBase { string _clli;
public string CLLI { get { return _clli; } set { _clli = value } }
}
In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class property and internally refer the base class property like below
class Asset: BaseAsset { public string Location { get { base.CLLI; } set { base.CLLI = value; } } } Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see them is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected , but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ?
Thanks baski
It sounds like you want to use an interface instead of inheritance.
If you have public properties in a base class, you won't be able to mask
them in inherited classes. The reason for this is simple.
We'll say that you have object X, we'll call it a ListBox, but you need
to use it with object Y, which only takes WebControls. If X hid members
of the WebControls class, it would no longer be considered a WebControl,
and wouldn't work with object Y.
An interface of common properties will be easier for you to control.
Let those properties be the external items that the dev's work with, but
keep everything else internal.
Essentially, you can't rename properties in child classes, because then
those classes would no longer be children.
Baski wrote: If any properties is renamed in derived class I want to mask that propoerty from developer derived class instance(just like Explicit interface implementation hide).
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Ah, now I understand.
When you rename the properties, do you need the originals to be unusable by the user/developer, or do you just want them not to show up in the "properties" window of the designer?
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl.. .
Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks Baski "Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl. ..
Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl.. .
>Base class: > > >class AssetBase >{ > string _clli; > > public string CLLI > { > get > { > return _clli; > } > set > { > _clli = value > } > } > > >} > > >In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class >property >and internally refer the base class property like below > > >class Asset: BaseAsset >{ > public string Location > { > get > { > base.CLLI; > } > set > { > base.CLLI = value; > } > } >} > > > >Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create Asset >instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to see >them >is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to protected >, >but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer >as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ? > > >Thanks >baski >
Well, then I don't think you can get that for free. I think you will have to
give it a protected modifier in the base class, and add a public property of
the same name in the derived class, if you want that property available.
Something like this:
// Base class protected property
protected string LabelText
{
get { return label.Text; }
set { label.Text = value;}
}
// Derived class hides it with a public property
public new string LabelText
{
get{return base.LabelText;}
set{base.LabelText = value;}
}
So you copy/paste the 2nd property into each derived class that doesn't
actually have a rename.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message
news:eD**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... If any properties is renamed in derived class I want to mask that propoerty from developer derived class instance(just like Explicit interface implementation hide).
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Ah, now I understand.
When you rename the properties, do you need the originals to be unusable by the user/developer, or do you just want them not to show up in the "properties" window of the designer?
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks Baski "Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the base that is not exposed by the derived property.
If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we very likely can suggest a solution for your problem.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Base class: > > > class AssetBase > { > string _clli; > > public string CLLI > { > get > { > return _clli; > } > set > { > _clli = value > } > } > > > } > > > In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class > property > and internally refer the base class property like below > > > class Asset: BaseAsset > { > public string Location > { > get > { > base.CLLI; > } > set > { > base.CLLI = value; > } > } > } > > > > Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create > Asset > instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to > see them > is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to > protected , > but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer > as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ? > > > Thanks > baski >
Oh, I just tried the opposite, and it did compile....
What I mean is having a public property in the base class, and then hiding
it ...
------------------
protected new string CCLI...
------------------------
I haven't tried to actually use something like that, though. I'd be leery of
taking away from the public signature of a base class in a derived class,
although I can see where it might make sense if the base class is
abstract... As long as it's clear that the base class's public property
isn't really part of the type's interface (ahh... ?!?)
-Rachel
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message
news:uQ**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Well, then I don't think you can get that for free. I think you will have to give it a protected modifier in the base class, and add a public property of the same name in the derived class, if you want that property available. Something like this:
// Base class protected property protected string LabelText { get { return label.Text; } set { label.Text = value;} }
// Derived class hides it with a public property public new string LabelText { get{return base.LabelText;} set{base.LabelText = value;} }
So you copy/paste the 2nd property into each derived class that doesn't actually have a rename.
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:eD**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... If any properties is renamed in derived class I want to mask that propoerty from developer derived class instance(just like Explicit interface implementation hide).
"Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Ah, now I understand.
When you rename the properties, do you need the originals to be unusable by the user/developer, or do you just want them not to show up in the "properties" window of the designer?
-Rachel
"Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Rachel,
I have base framework , which will be used for multiple clients , each client will call the properties in different names. Base class will not be used by the developer any where. We are using the inheritance to get most functionality(reusability) from base class and easily adopt the new client with simple name customization.
If the base class properties is not renamed in the derived class , I want the developer to see as it's defined in base class from derived class instance variable.
If you need more explanation, plese feel free to email me.
Thanks Baski "Rachel Suddeth" <ra****@bldhound.com> wrote in message news:O%****************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Please give a brief example that illustrates what you really want to > do. In the example you give, there is no reason to hide the base > property with another, since it is exactly the same as the derived > one, and also nothing the developer could possibly want to use in the > base that is not exposed by the derived property. > > If you can give us an understanding of what you really want to do, we > very likely can suggest a solution for your problem. > > -Rachel > > "Baski" <ba***@aldensys.com> wrote in message > news:eI****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >> Base class: >> >> >> class AssetBase >> { >> string _clli; >> >> public string CLLI >> { >> get >> { >> return _clli; >> } >> set >> { >> _clli = value >> } >> } >> >> >> } >> >> >> In Derived Class I want to give different name to the base class >> property >> and internally refer the base class property like below >> >> >> class Asset: BaseAsset >> { >> public string Location >> { >> get >> { >> base.CLLI; >> } >> set >> { >> base.CLLI = value; >> } >> } >> } >> >> >> >> Now , when the developer use this dll in their project and create >> Asset >> instance I want to hide the AssetBase Property CLLI , all i want to >> see them >> is Location. I can do this by making base class properties to >> protected , >> but I want some of the property to be exposed to the developer >> as it's defined in base class. How can I do that ? >> >> >> Thanks >> baski >> > >
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Chris Dunaway |
last post by:
When using a PropertyGrid, I have an object with a Date property, but I am
only interested in the Time portion. How do I make the PropertyGrid allow
editing the time only? Just the hours and...
|
by: JustSomeGuy |
last post by:
I have a few classes...
class a : std::list<baseclass>
{
int keya;
};
class b : std::list<a>
{
int keyb;
|
by: Kurt Lange |
last post by:
no... the array is created dynamically.
and no... that defeats the purpose of what im trying
todo..
encapsulate all initializing of variables in base
class...
derive from it... by deriving...
|
by: m. pollack |
last post by:
<I've reposted this as it was slipping away over the horizon
Hi all,
I've been writing an application that uses a class object (call it Element) that I need to expose to the user at runtime for...
|
by: Andrew |
last post by:
I am trying to set the column information - which ones I want displayed and
how with the web grid control. The interface has some big differences when
compared to the winform.
Is this possible...
|
by: Sanjeev |
last post by:
Hi ,
Can anyone help on this?
Thank you,
Sanjeev
"Sanjeev" <nospam@notvalid.com> wrote in message
news:OG4VyxwnDHA.2444@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
|
by: Gerry |
last post by:
I have a combo box and I can populate it with my class of dat
(the class allows me to store each userid,username called - see code below
I want the user to select the dropdown and see the...
|
by: John Richardson |
last post by:
My original posting (Dec 12, this group) is copied below, but it boils down
to a simple question first:
does an inherited class prevent certain internal properties (inherited from
an ancestor...
|
by: Johnny J. |
last post by:
I posted this last week, but didn't get any reply. I'm trying again now,
because I'm getting desperate - I've tried everything I can think of myself.
PLEASE help somebody.
I've made an inherited...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |