15  1186 
HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now. The
expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first quarter, I
would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Hongjun Zheng" <hz****@semdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:ei*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I learned from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/te...e/default.aspx, that there is C# 2.0 specification. I was wandering if 2.0 has been
implemented,
released in any production and Beta.
Any ideas? Thanks.
HJ
> HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now. The
expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first quarter, I
would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date as Whidbey
(2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due the
beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :) (Forgot
codename for that).
Mythran
Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
Thanks
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:ef**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now. The
expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first quarter,
I would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Hongjun Zheng" <hz****@semdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:ei*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I learned from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/te...e/default.aspx, that there is C# 2.0 specification. I was wandering if 2.0 has been
implemented,
released in any production and Beta.
Any ideas? Thanks.
HJ
Mythran,
That's exactly right. VS.NET 2005 is slated to coincide with the SQL
Server 2005 release, which means that .NET 2005 would have to come out at
the same time as well.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now.
The expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date as
Whidbey (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due
the beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :) (Forgot
codename for that).
Mythran
George,
Pricing will probably not be known until sometime before the release
date.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"George" <ge****@noemail.com> wrote in message
news:O%***************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
Thanks
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote
in message news:ef**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now.
The expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Hongjun Zheng" <hz****@semdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:ei*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I learned from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/te...e/default.aspx, that there is C# 2.0 specification. I was wandering if 2.0 has been
implemented,
released in any production and Beta.
Any ideas? Thanks.
HJ
George <ge****@noemail.com> wrote: Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
I think that's unlikely - there's a lot more difference between VS.NET
2003 and Whidbey than there was between VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
"Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now.
The expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date as
Whidbey (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due
the beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :) (Forgot
codename for that).
Mythran
I know it's a little confusing but Whidbey was the code name for both the
..NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 so:
C# Whidbey = C# 2.0 = C# 2005
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
George wrote: Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
right, $39 to upgrade a 3 year old development environment (when 2005 is
release).... I don't see that one happening.
2002 to 2003 was cheap because it was an incremental update, 1.0 to 1.1...
Jamie
Rob,
Whidbey was actually just the code name for VS.NET, it was never the
code name for the framework itself. Since VS.NET depends on .NET and its
enhancements, the code name was given to VS.NET.
Also, C# does not have a 2005 version. It will be referred to as C#
2.0.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:eJ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... HJ,
C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now. The expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first quarter, I would guess).
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date as
Whidbey (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due
the beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :)
(Forgot codename for that).
Mythran
I know it's a little confusing but Whidbey was the code name for both the
.NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 so:
C# Whidbey = C# 2.0 = C# 2005
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
I have the March Preview of VS.NET 2005 and SQL Server Yukon, and Whidbey is awesome. Also, I'm prety sure its in the alpha stage, not beta.
--
I am a 14 year old C# developer, I am completely self taught, so please don't get mad if I ask a stupid question. Thanks.
"jamie" wrote: George wrote: Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
right, $39 to upgrade a 3 year old development environment (when 2005 is
release).... I don't see that one happening.
2002 to 2003 was cheap because it was an incremental update, 1.0 to 1.1...
Jamie
I thought all the stuff that was based on the 2.0 version of the framework
(i.e. the CLR, FCL, languages and IDE) was part of Whidbey. It's not really
important.
As far as the naming goes, I was just looking through the TechEd sessions
(which are starting to come online at the link below) and all the C#
specific sessions use "Visual C# 2005" as the name of the product. http://microsoft.sitestream.com/teched2004/index.html
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote in
message news:%2***************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Rob,
Whidbey was actually just the code name for VS.NET, it was never the
code name for the framework itself. Since VS.NET depends on .NET and its
enhancements, the code name was given to VS.NET.
Also, C# does not have a 2005 version. It will be referred to as C#
2.0.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:eJ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > HJ,
>
> C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right now.
The > expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I > would guess).
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
> --
> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
> - mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
>
>
If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date
as Whidbey (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is
due the beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :) (Forgot codename for that).
Mythran
I know it's a little confusing but Whidbey was the code name for both
the .NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 so:
C# Whidbey = C# 2.0 = C# 2005
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
Rob,
Visual C# 2005 is the name for the development environment (there is a
standalone Visual C# product), not the language itself. The language itself
is going to be C# 2.0.
Like you said, it's not really important. =)
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:uR**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I thought all the stuff that was based on the 2.0 version of the framework
(i.e. the CLR, FCL, languages and IDE) was part of Whidbey. It's not
really important.
As far as the naming goes, I was just looking through the TechEd sessions
(which are starting to come online at the link below) and all the C#
specific sessions use "Visual C# 2005" as the name of the product.
http://microsoft.sitestream.com/teched2004/index.html
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote
in message news:%2***************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Rob,
Whidbey was actually just the code name for VS.NET, it was never the
code name for the framework itself. Since VS.NET depends on .NET and
its enhancements, the code name was given to VS.NET.
Also, C# does not have a 2005 version. It will be referred to as C#
2.0.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:eJ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > HJ,
> >
> > C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right
now. The
> > expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I
> > would guess).
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
> > - mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
> >
> >
>
> If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date
as Whidbey
> (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due the
> beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :)
(Forgot > codename for that).
>
> Mythran
>
>
I know it's a little confusing but Whidbey was the code name for both the .NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 so:
C# Whidbey = C# 2.0 = C# 2005
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
Bill,
Just remember, "there's no such thing as stupid questions, just stupid
people asking questions!" Chris Bermen of ESPN SportsCenter.
"Bill English" <nu****@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:A2**********************************@microsof t.com... I have the March Preview of VS.NET 2005 and SQL Server Yukon, and Whidbey
is awesome. Also, I'm prety sure its in the alpha stage, not beta.
--
I am a 14 year old C# developer, I am completely self taught, so please
don't get mad if I ask a stupid question. Thanks.
"jamie" wrote:
George wrote: > Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
>
right, $39 to upgrade a 3 year old development environment (when 2005 is
release).... I don't see that one happening.
2002 to 2003 was cheap because it was an incremental update, 1.0 to
1.1...
Jamie
Bill,
Just remember, "there's no such thing as stupid questions, just stupid
people asking questions!" Chris Bermen of ESPN SportsCenter.
"Bill English" <nu****@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:A2**********************************@microsof t.com... I have the March Preview of VS.NET 2005 and SQL Server Yukon, and Whidbey
is awesome. Also, I'm prety sure its in the alpha stage, not beta.
--
I am a 14 year old C# developer, I am completely self taught, so please
don't get mad if I ask a stupid question. Thanks.
"jamie" wrote:
George wrote: > Do we know if the upgrade will be as cheap as last upgrade ($39)?
>
right, $39 to upgrade a 3 year old development environment (when 2005 is
release).... I don't see that one happening.
2002 to 2003 was cheap because it was an incremental update, 1.0 to
1.1...
Jamie
all the popup links for the development section are dead
could you let us know when these are fixed?
thanks.
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:uR**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I thought all the stuff that was based on the 2.0 version of the framework
(i.e. the CLR, FCL, languages and IDE) was part of Whidbey. It's not
really important.
As far as the naming goes, I was just looking through the TechEd sessions
(which are starting to come online at the link below) and all the C#
specific sessions use "Visual C# 2005" as the name of the product.
http://microsoft.sitestream.com/teched2004/index.html
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote
in message news:%2***************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... Rob,
Whidbey was actually just the code name for VS.NET, it was never the
code name for the framework itself. Since VS.NET depends on .NET and
its enhancements, the code name was given to VS.NET.
Also, C# does not have a 2005 version. It will be referred to as C#
2.0.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
"Rob Windsor [MVP]" <rw******@NO.MORE.SPAM.bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:eJ**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... "Mythran" <ki********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eK*************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > HJ,
> >
> > C# 2.0 (and .NET 2.0 and VS.NET 2005) are all in beta right
now. The
> > expected release date for these things is sometime in 2005 (first
quarter, I
> > would guess).
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
> > - mv*@spam.guard.caspershouse.com
> >
> >
>
> If that's the case, it seems to have the same "rough" projected date
as Whidbey
> (2005), if it's scheduled for the first quarter of 2005. Whidbey is due the
> beginning of next year as well. Same goes with SqlServer 2005 :)
(Forgot > codename for that).
>
> Mythran
>
>
I know it's a little confusing but Whidbey was the code name for both the .NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 so:
C# Whidbey = C# 2.0 = C# 2005
--
Rob Windsor [MVP-VB]
G6 Consulting
Toronto, Canada
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: mark4asp |
last post by:
Why won't the window.status message change ?
IE ver. 6.0.2800.1106 displays the tooltip OK.
<td>
<A HREF="editAuthor.asp?item=4"
title="Edit author details"...
|
by: Charles Mendell |
last post by:
1. When I go to http://www.w3schools.com/js/default.asp and choose:
2. JS HTML DOM and then choose:
3. the Window object and then choose:
4. Write some text in the windows status bar ( a link)...
|
by: Ada |
last post by:
i have a little bit of issue getting the status bar to work properly.
this is what happens now.
when the program loaded, the status is "READY..."
the code is inside the FORM LOAD.
i also...
|
by: Frances |
last post by:
Firefox is not respecting window.status, examples in this pg
http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~jgwang/jsform02.htm
are ignored by Firefox.. why is this.. is there a solution.. thank you..
Frances
|
by: FAQ server |
last post by:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAQ Topic - I have window.status="Moomin"; why doesn't the statusbar change?...
|
by: Mark |
last post by:
Hey folks, I'm looking at making the following query more efficient
potentially using the ranking functions and I'd like some advice from
the gurus. The purpose of the following is to have a...
|
by: bharathreddy |
last post by:
This article will explain you how to find the status of the fax operation. (Using FAXCOM.dll). Author: Bharath Reddy VasiReddy
Reference to the FAXCOM.DLL
Reference to
import FAXCOM...
|
by: Edwin.Madari |
last post by:
updated creature running in its own thread will get you started. try it foryourself, change sleep times per your need.
import os, sys, threading, time
class Creature:
def __init__(self,...
|
by: tshad |
last post by:
I have a Windows App that is doing some work and then writing a "Now
Processing..." line to the status line of the window as well as the Textbox
on the form.
But the problem is that the work is...
|
by: tvnaidu |
last post by:
I wrote a status page HTML code, here I have 8 port status, it prints first 7 and last status it won't print, from there onwards it won't print footer also, if I make 10 instead 8, then it prints...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |
