Left, Right and Mid

[A.M]

Hi,

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we
had in vb6?

Thanks,
Alan

[Michael Culley]

left is MyString.SubString(0,length)
mid is MyString.SubString(start, length)
right is MyString.SubString(MyString.Length - length)

--
Michael Culley
"A.M" <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote in message news:uM**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we
had in vb6?

Thanks,
Alan

[Justin Rogers]

string myString = "My String";
Left: myString.Substring(0, 4); // Left 4 characters
Right: myString.Substring(myString.Length - 4); // Right 4 characters
Mid: myString.Substring(startIndex); // Mid overload 1
Mid: myString.Substring(startIndex, count); // Mid overload 2

Mid has optional parameters, so these act as overloads in C#. The Substring
method can easily handle all formats of the VB methods. You will have to
convert
from using 1 based indexing to 0 based indexing, since the VB functions use 1 to
denote the first character and Substring uses 0.
--
Justin Rogers
DigiTec Web Consultants, LLC.
Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers

"A.M" <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote in message
news:uM**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we
had in vb6?

Thanks,
Alan

[John Timney \(Microsoft MVP\)]

as well as the answers the other guys have provided, you can also import the
visualbasic lib and actually use left, right and mid in c'

--
Regards

John Timney
Microsoft Regional Director
Microsoft MVP
"A.M" <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote in message
news:uM**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we
had in vb6?

Thanks,
Alan

[A.M]

Thaks John, That is actually a good idea!

"John Timney (Microsoft MVP)" <ti*****@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:uA*************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

as well as the answers the other guys have provided, you can also import the visualbasic lib and actually use left, right and mid in c'

--
Regards

John Timney
Microsoft Regional Director
Microsoft MVP
"A.M" <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote in message
news:uM**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Hi,

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we had in vb6?

Thanks,
Alan

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

A.M <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote:

Thaks John, That is actually a good idea!

No, it's not. Substring is a perfectly good alternative, and one which
stays within the idiom of C# and .NET, rather than making your code
look like a mixture of C# and old VB.

It will work, but it will be harder for other C# programmers (without
VB experience) to understand. It will require the Microsoft.VisualBasic
assembly to be loaded for no particularly good reason. It will use a
method which has been significantly less thoroughly tested than
Substring (because virtually all .NET programmers use Substring whereas
only a few will be using the ported VB methods).

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu]

"A.M" <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote in news:uMMhrMSPEHA.1392
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

Using C#, what is the equivalent of functions Left, Right and Mid that we
had in vb6?

Remember that in .NET strings are objects. So dont look for global functions,
but look at the methods of the string object itself.
--
Chad Z. Hower (a.k.a. Kudzu) - http://www.hower.org/Kudzu/
"Programming is an art form that fights back"

Get your ASP.NET in gear with IntraWeb!
http://www.atozed.com/IntraWeb/

[clintonG]

I couldn't agree more. Just because something can be done
is not a logical reason for doing so.
--
<%= Clinton Gallagher
A/E/C Consulting, Web Design, e-Commerce Software Development
Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin USA
NET csgallagher@ REMOVETHISTEXT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om...

A.M <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote:

Thaks John, That is actually a good idea!
No, it's not. Substring is a perfectly good alternative, and one which
stays within the idiom of C# and .NET, rather than making your code
look like a mixture of C# and old VB.

It will work, but it will be harder for other C# programmers (without
VB experience) to understand. It will require the

Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly to be loaded for no particularly good reason. It will use a
method which has been significantly less thoroughly tested than
Substring (because virtually all .NET programmers use Substring whereas only a few will be using the ported VB methods).

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[A.M]

Thank you for comment.

Unfotunately, I have to be 100% agree with you about about using
Microsoft.VisualBasic assmebly; however I have to subclass my own simple
string class to abstract Left and Mid and Right. It is not the name of
function. It is more convenient to send a simple parameter which is really
needed for that operation if we use it too often.

I was excited because I didn't think about using Microsoft.VisualBasic
assmebly in C# !

Thank you again,
Alan

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om...

A.M <IH*******@sapm123.com> wrote:

Thaks John, That is actually a good idea!

No, it's not. Substring is a perfectly good alternative, and one which
stays within the idiom of C# and .NET, rather than making your code
look like a mixture of C# and old VB.

It will work, but it will be harder for other C# programmers (without
VB experience) to understand. It will require the Microsoft.VisualBasic
assembly to be loaded for no particularly good reason. It will use a
method which has been significantly less thoroughly tested than
Substring (because virtually all .NET programmers use Substring whereas
only a few will be using the ported VB methods).

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too