Stack size setting in VS.net

[Peter]

My program causes StackOverflow because it makes many recursive calls due to
the program's nature (not a bug!).
I would like to know if there is any settings in the compiler or VS.NET IDE
so that I can increase the stack size to prevent the overflow error.
Thanks a lot!

Peter

http://www.infopx.com

[Paul E Collins]

"Peter" <yu******@hotmail.com> wrote:

My program causes StackOverflow because it makes
many recursive calls due to the program's nature (not
a bug!).

What are you doing recursively? There might be a better way.

P.

[cody]

> My program causes StackOverflow because it makes many recursive calls due
to

the program's nature (not a bug!).
I would like to know if there is any settings in the compiler or VS.NET IDE so that I can increase the stack size to prevent the overflow error.
Thanks a lot!

If your program needs so much stack that the default stack size is not
sufficient then you certainly doing things wrong. maybe there is no need for
recursion or you can minimize the number of arguments or locals in your
method.

--
cody

[Freeware, Games and Humor]
www.deutronium.de.vu || www.deutronium.tk

[Sam Gentile [MVP - C#/.NET]]

>If your program needs so much stack that the default stack size is not

sufficient then you certainly doing things wrong. maybe there is no need
for
recursion or you can minimize the number of arguments or locals in your
method

I would tend to agree. The stack size should be more than sufficient
--
-----
Sam Gentile
Microsoft MVP - C#/.NET
..NET Blog http://samgentile.com/blog/

Please do NOT contact me directly but respond to
the newsgroup instead.
---------
"cody" <pl*************************@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:eN**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

My program causes StackOverflow because it makes many recursive calls due

to

the program's nature (not a bug!).
I would like to know if there is any settings in the compiler or VS.NET

IDE

so that I can increase the stack size to prevent the overflow error.
Thanks a lot!

If your program needs so much stack that the default stack size is not
sufficient then you certainly doing things wrong. maybe there is no need
for
recursion or you can minimize the number of arguments or locals in your
method.

--
cody

[Freeware, Games and Humor]
www.deutronium.de.vu || www.deutronium.tk

[Peter]

Thanks for all your helps. I tried to recursive about 1000 times and then
found that the stack was overflow. Well, there's another way to solve the
problem... I am just a bit lazy to think about it because the recursive one
is very simple.

Peter

http://www.infopx.com
"Sam Gentile [MVP - C#/.NET]" <no****@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:eR**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

If your program needs so much stack that the default stack size is not
sufficient then you certainly doing things wrong. maybe there is no need
for
recursion or you can minimize the number of arguments or locals in your
method

I would tend to agree. The stack size should be more than sufficient
--
-----
Sam Gentile
Microsoft MVP - C#/.NET
.NET Blog http://samgentile.com/blog/

Please do NOT contact me directly but respond to
the newsgroup instead.
---------
"cody" <pl*************************@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:eN**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

My program causes StackOverflow because it makes many recursive calls

due to

the program's nature (not a bug!).
I would like to know if there is any settings in the compiler or VS.NET

IDE

so that I can increase the stack size to prevent the overflow error.
Thanks a lot!

If your program needs so much stack that the default stack size is not
sufficient then you certainly doing things wrong. maybe there is no need
for
recursion or you can minimize the number of arguments or locals in your
method.

--
cody

[Freeware, Games and Humor]
www.deutronium.de.vu || www.deutronium.tk