473,406 Members | 2,343 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,406 software developers and data experts.

Is this Legal... Illegal ?!

I have an interesting issue. rather I should call this as confusing issue.
:-)

I have a small proto in my project, which should act as a server[runs on
XP], which essentially requests info and passes the info to another hardware
interface.

Since this is a non-critical piece, I simply had UNC Path to transfer the
info as XML. But even at my initial testing of the application, I had
bloopers

Issue: Windows XP Professional has a limit on simultaneous connections to 10
users, and XP Home Edition has a limit of 5 users.

Here is a Knowledge Base Article that describes this,
http://support.microsoft.com/default...2&ID=KB;EN-US;
Q314882

Fine.. So I thought I shall use TCP Connections, which definitely accepts
more than 10 simultaneous users, but when I read the KB again, I found the
following statement "The TCP connection limit is not enforced, but it may be
bound by legal agreement to not permit more than 10 clients."

So If I build the Application using TCP Connections, AM I BREAKING **EULA**
:-) [!] ????

Here is an interesting Post on this

<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...hreadm=O9N0czJ
QCHA.968%40tkmsftngp04&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26
oe%3DUTF-8%26q%3DXP%2Binbound%2Bconnections%2BEULA>

Any takers. !! somebody plz :-)

-- Logu
Nov 16 '05 #1
4 2782
Hi Logu,

For the IIS, the connection limitation is enforced for Windows XP is facing personal scenario. For TCP connection, thus far, I haven't heard any
limitation enformance with Windows XP. However, this is not to say there is no any limitation on TCP connection. The best method I can find now is
that you can contanct the saler or vendor of your windows XP. You can ask them whether there is one limitation existing for the tcp connection.

Furthermore, you can also call microsoft for this kind of issue. Please call 1-800-426-9400 (select option 4), Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to
6:00 P.M. (PST) to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist. Worldwide customers can use the Guide to Worldwide Microsoft Licensing Sites
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/index/worldwide.asp to find contact information in their locations.

Please feel free to let me know if you have any further questions.

Best Regards,
Wei-Dong Xu
Microsoft Product Support Services
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Nov 16 '05 #2
I think you should read up on "Client Access Licenses." My understanding is
that you can serve web pages to an unlimited number of users, and that
various web-ish things are treated the same way.

But I am remembering the licenses for Server 2003 and Windows 2000 Server.
The non-server versions may indeed be more limited.

"Logu" <kl***@scapevelocity.com> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
I have an interesting issue. rather I should call this as confusing issue.
:-)

I have a small proto in my project, which should act as a server[runs on
XP], which essentially requests info and passes the info to another hardware interface.

Since this is a non-critical piece, I simply had UNC Path to transfer the
info as XML. But even at my initial testing of the application, I had
bloopers

Issue: Windows XP Professional has a limit on simultaneous connections to 10 users, and XP Home Edition has a limit of 5 users.

Here is a Knowledge Base Article that describes this,
http://support.microsoft.com/default...2&ID=KB;EN-US; Q314882

Fine.. So I thought I shall use TCP Connections, which definitely accepts
more than 10 simultaneous users, but when I read the KB again, I found the
following statement "The TCP connection limit is not enforced, but it may be bound by legal agreement to not permit more than 10 clients."

So If I build the Application using TCP Connections, AM I BREAKING **EULA** :-) [!] ????

Here is an interesting Post on this

<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...hreadm=O9N0czJ QCHA.968%40tkmsftngp04&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26 oe%3DUTF-8%26q%3DXP%2Binbound%2Bconnections%2BEULA>

Any takers. !! somebody plz :-)

-- Logu

Nov 16 '05 #3
Hi Logu,

For the IIS, the connection limitation is enforced for Windows XP is facing personal scenario. For TCP connection, thus far, I haven't heard any
limitation enformance with Windows XP. However, this is not to say there is no any limitation on TCP connection. The best method I can find now is
that you can contanct the saler or vendor of your windows XP. You can ask them whether there is one limitation existing for the tcp connection.

Furthermore, you can also call microsoft for this kind of issue. Please call 1-800-426-9400 (select option 4), Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to
6:00 P.M. (PST) to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist. Worldwide customers can use the Guide to Worldwide Microsoft Licensing Sites
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/index/worldwide.asp to find contact information in their locations.

Please feel free to let me know if you have any further questions.

Best Regards,
Wei-Dong Xu
Microsoft Product Support Services
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Nov 16 '05 #4
I think you should read up on "Client Access Licenses." My understanding is
that you can serve web pages to an unlimited number of users, and that
various web-ish things are treated the same way.

But I am remembering the licenses for Server 2003 and Windows 2000 Server.
The non-server versions may indeed be more limited.

"Logu" <kl***@scapevelocity.com> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
I have an interesting issue. rather I should call this as confusing issue.
:-)

I have a small proto in my project, which should act as a server[runs on
XP], which essentially requests info and passes the info to another hardware interface.

Since this is a non-critical piece, I simply had UNC Path to transfer the
info as XML. But even at my initial testing of the application, I had
bloopers

Issue: Windows XP Professional has a limit on simultaneous connections to 10 users, and XP Home Edition has a limit of 5 users.

Here is a Knowledge Base Article that describes this,
http://support.microsoft.com/default...2&ID=KB;EN-US; Q314882

Fine.. So I thought I shall use TCP Connections, which definitely accepts
more than 10 simultaneous users, but when I read the KB again, I found the
following statement "The TCP connection limit is not enforced, but it may be bound by legal agreement to not permit more than 10 clients."

So If I build the Application using TCP Connections, AM I BREAKING **EULA** :-) [!] ????

Here is an interesting Post on this

<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...hreadm=O9N0czJ QCHA.968%40tkmsftngp04&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26 oe%3DUTF-8%26q%3DXP%2Binbound%2Bconnections%2BEULA>

Any takers. !! somebody plz :-)

-- Logu

Nov 16 '05 #5

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

7
by: Nice | last post by:
Hi. I read somewhere that in XML the tag <xml> is not legal. But in W3C specs I can't find this statement. Does anyone know about it ?
14
by: Ryan | last post by:
I want to do the following SQL statement in Access. However, it won't allow me to have the secondary part of my join statement and tells me that this is not supported. OK, so Access doesn't support...
13
by: Kelvin Moss | last post by:
Hi group, In C++ it's undefined behavior if one tries to un-const the constness of a const variable with const_cast<>. I want to know if the same holds good in C too. E.g. const char *s =...
10
by: Kelvin Moss | last post by:
Hi group, In C++ it's undefined behavior if one tries to un-const the constness of a const variable with const_cast<>. I want to know if the same holds good in C too. E.g. const char *s =...
11
by: Alberto Giménez | last post by:
Hi, I've seen some object oriented programming bits out there and i'm not sure if they're legal. For example: struct Object { int field1; int field2; }; struct SubObject { int field1; /*...
14
by: Frank Rizzo | last post by:
I realize that this maybe the wrong forum, but maybe someone has run into this situation before. I sell an app and I want to offer my customers a migration path from a competing product. However,...
30
by: Kiuhnm | last post by:
#include <new> class T { }; int main() { T t = t; T u(u);
10
by: John T. | last post by:
Hi all Figure this scenario: - My Company develops an assembly (a controls DLL) - Since an obfuscation software is too expensive, my Company engages a consultant and delegates him the...
4
by: Jon | last post by:
struct B2; struct B1 { virtual B2* get2() = 0; }; struct B2 { virtual B1* get1() = 0; };
36
by: Max | last post by:
This was asked in a C test. Is the following code legal C? Is it legal in C90? C99? #define main() int main #define mainbody () { return 0; } mainbody
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.