Accessibility Modifers for classes

[ian_malcom_im]

Hi all

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this. Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in CIL

Can anyone confirm or deny this

Thank
IM

[Peter Rilling]

The C# modify is "internal protected". This is different then "protected
internal". Order of modifiers matters.
"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've
looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this.
Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in
CIL.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM

[Grant Richins [MS]]

Nope, sorry. There is no way to get "famandassem". And in response to
Peter's post "internal protected" and "protected internal" have the *EXACT*
same semantics.

--
--Grant
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Peter Rilling" <pe***@nospam.rilling.net> wrote in message
news:Oh**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

The C# modify is "internal protected". This is different then "protected
internal". Order of modifiers matters.
"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is

possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've
looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this.
Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in
CIL.

Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM

[Chris Taylor]

Hi,

In C# order does not matter, both 'protected internal' and 'internal
protected' compile to famorassem, famandassem is not exposed through C#.

Hope this helps

--
Chris Taylor
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/chris.taylor/
"Peter Rilling" <pe***@nospam.rilling.net> wrote in message
news:Oh**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

The C# modify is "internal protected". This is different then "protected
internal". Order of modifiers matters.
"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is

possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've
looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this.
Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in
CIL.

Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM

[Peter Rilling]

I thought they were different. Sorry.

"Grant Richins [MS]" <gr*****@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uI**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Nope, sorry. There is no way to get "famandassem". And in response to
Peter's post "internal protected" and "protected internal" have the *EXACT* same semantics.

--
--Grant
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Peter Rilling" <pe***@nospam.rilling.net> wrote in message
news:Oh**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

The C# modify is "internal protected". This is different then "protected internal". Order of modifiers matters.
"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is

possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this. Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in CIL.

Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM

[Stoitcho Goutsev \(100\) [C# MVP]]

Hi ian,

C# does not support family and assembly access modifiers.

--
B\rgds
100

"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've
looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this.
Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in
CIL.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM

[ian_malcom_im]

Thanks all! That was helpful.

[Daniel O'Connell [C# MVP]]

Out of raw curiosity, has anyone come up with a accessibility modifier
keyword for famandassem that would actually work in C#? I've been thinking
about this for a while now and I can't come up with anything that fits.

"ia***********@yahoo.com" <an*******@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:29**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi all,

i'm reading up on the internals of the CLR and I noticed that it is possible to make a class have the famandassem accessibility modifier. I've
looked at the C# language reference and I don't think that C# can do this.
Note that this is not protected internal, which is mapped to famorassem in
CIL.
Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Thank!
IM