Da~One,
Da! this is an easy one. ;-)
Which language are you more efficient at writing in?
If you are twice as fast at VB.NET then you are at C# use VB.NET. If you are
twice at C# then use VB.NET. I have a couple of fair size projects in
VB.NET, I really don't notice the background building in VS.NET 2.003 (maybe
I'm just use to it). I did however notice it in VS.NET 2002.
However!! I would not use background compilation as a criteria. I would use
the language that was best "suited" to the task. This means if I needed both
some VB.NET & some C#, then I would use both. If I needed a little Managed
C++, then I would throw that in. Of course you also should consider is this
a one man development project or a team development? Who is going to
maintain it when you are done?
IMHO Mostly the choice should be what language you & your team are
comfortable with!
Of course either language (VS.NET really) benefits from higher end
processors & of course lots of ram!
Hope this helps
Jay
"Da~One" <da***@whothat.com> wrote in message
news:e8**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
This message has been posted to 2 groups, one to the VB.NET group, and the
other to C#.
I am trying to decide which language to commit to for a large scale
project. I am looking for the input of people who have gone through this process
before.
I am currently leaning towards C# solely because I envision VB.NET slowing
down exponentially as projects are added with the constant background
compilation.
Can you turn this background compilation off in VB.NET?
Is C# totally without background compilation?
Any other considerations?
Thank you.