CheckedChanged question

[Patrick De Ridder]

What is the effect of the following line?
checkBox1_CheckedChanged(null,null);
Thanks,
Patrick.

[William Ryan]

YOu probably won't notice a difference unless you are interrogating either
the sender, eventargs. It'll still behave just like anything else, except
that those two thing will be null, so you won't know what triggered the
event or any of the event args. Off the top of my head, I'm not sure what
benefit you'd derive from doing this but I don't think it would hurt except
that it goes against the whole sender/notification paragidm.
"Patrick De Ridder" <00@00.00> wrote in message
news:10***************@evisp-news-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net...

What is the effect of the following line?
checkBox1_CheckedChanged(null,null);
Thanks,
Patrick.

[Patrick De Ridder]

What does the line actually do?
Patrick.

"William Ryan" <do********@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OS**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

YOu probably won't notice a difference unless you are interrogating either
the sender, eventargs. It'll still behave just like anything else, except
that those two thing will be null, so you won't know what triggered the
event or any of the event args. Off the top of my head, I'm not sure what
benefit you'd derive from doing this but I don't think it would hurt except that it goes against the whole sender/notification paragidm.
"Patrick De Ridder" <00@00.00> wrote in message
news:10***************@evisp-news-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net...

What is the effect of the following line?
checkBox1_CheckedChanged(null,null);
Thanks,
Patrick.

[William Ryan]

It's just like a function call... I could call a Sum function which takes
in two arguments Sum(1, 1) or 0,0. You need to pass in something b/c it's
expecting something (object and eventargs) but you don't have to do anythign
with them.
"Patrick De Ridder" <00@00.00> wrote in message
news:10**************@evisp-news-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net...

What does the line actually do?
Patrick.

"William Ryan" <do********@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:OS**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

YOu probably won't notice a difference unless you are interrogating either the sender, eventargs. It'll still behave just like anything else, except that those two thing will be null, so you won't know what triggered the
event or any of the event args. Off the top of my head, I'm not sure what benefit you'd derive from doing this but I don't think it would hurt

except

that it goes against the whole sender/notification paragidm.
"Patrick De Ridder" <00@00.00> wrote in message
news:10***************@evisp-news-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net...

What is the effect of the following line?
checkBox1_CheckedChanged(null,null);
Thanks,
Patrick.