473,387 Members | 1,464 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,387 software developers and data experts.

Null out original reference?

RMD
I need to be able to keep a list of object references, and null them out one
by one at a later point in time. I realize this can be dangerous, but I have
my reasons.

I can't figure out, however, how to keep what is essentially a reference to
a reference. I want to store my objects in an ArrayList, then loop through
the array list and null out the original reference I was given when I added
it to my Array List.

Below is some example code:

//Here is some example usage
object nullMe;
Nuller nuller = new Nuller();

nullMe = new object();
nuller.AddToNullList(ref nullMe);
nuller.NullItOut();

//Here is my "Nuller" class:
public class Nuller
{
private ArrayList m_NullList = new ArrayList();

public void AddToNullList(ref object nullMe)
{
m_NullList.Add(nullMe);
}

public unsafe void NullItOut()
{
for(int i = 0; i < m_NullList.Count; i++)
{
//I want this to null out the original reference... the "nullMe"
variable in the usage example code.
m_NullList[i] = null;
}
}
}

How do I accomplish this?

RMD
Nov 15 '05 #1
6 1765
> I need to be able to keep a list of object references, and
null them out one by one at a later point in time. I realize
this can be dangerous, but I have my reasons.
Well, it's really not that dangerous so much as it is completely useless.
I can't figure out, however, how to keep what is essentially
a reference to a reference. I want to store my objects in an
ArrayList, then loop through the array list and null out the
original reference I was given when I added it to my Array List.

[SNIP]

How do I accomplish this?


When your variable (nullMe in your example) goes out of scope, it
automatically ceases to exist. As part of it's non-existance, it doesn't
reference your object anymore. This also means that you CANNOT null it
out... it's already gone!

Why exactly do you need to null references out anyway?

-JG
Nov 15 '05 #2
RMD
Actually, it's not completely useless. The code I pasted was an example, not
what I'm actually doing.

My scenario is far too complicated to explain completely, but the gist of it
is that I need to null out private member variables of a class from one of
it's base classes. An event occurs, and the base class handles the event.
Part of the handler is to loop through some "registered" variables
(variables which were passed to a function like the "AddToNullList" method
in my example by the class in question), and null them out. I need to null
the actual member variables, not simply my local stack-based reference.

RMD
"Juan Gabriel Del Cid" <jd*****@atrevido.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:eP**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
I need to be able to keep a list of object references, and
null them out one by one at a later point in time. I realize
this can be dangerous, but I have my reasons.


Well, it's really not that dangerous so much as it is completely useless.
I can't figure out, however, how to keep what is essentially
a reference to a reference. I want to store my objects in an
ArrayList, then loop through the array list and null out the
original reference I was given when I added it to my Array List.

[SNIP]

How do I accomplish this?


When your variable (nullMe in your example) goes out of scope, it
automatically ceases to exist. As part of it's non-existance, it doesn't
reference your object anymore. This also means that you CANNOT null it
out... it's already gone!

Why exactly do you need to null references out anyway?

-JG

Nov 15 '05 #3
RMD <rm*@nospam.sorry.com> wrote:
Actually, it's not completely useless. The code I pasted was an example, not
what I'm actually doing.

My scenario is far too complicated to explain completely, but the gist of it
is that I need to null out private member variables of a class from one of
it's base classes.


That sounds like a very strange design. What's the bigger picture here?

Given that you're just not going to be able to do it this way, if you
post some more information we may be able to suggest some better ways
of accomplishing the same grander aim.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Nov 15 '05 #4
RMD
Well, it wasn't really my intention to design it this way... it just kinda
happened. :-)

Basically, this is part of a O/R mapping project. I wanted to be able to
have a base class handle the management of all member variables of a domain
object. If you commit the domain object, it persists all the data for your
object as well as calling commit for any members that are also domain
objects.

So say one of those member domain objects was marked for deletion and was
deleted due to the commit. I wanted to detect that (I have an "OnCommit"
event that the parent domain object listens for from all its domain object
members), and null out the member variable. I can't expose properties for
each of these member variables (for a bunch of reasons), so I wanted to be
able to store a pointer to the original member and null out that memory
location when the event is fired.

Currently, I have the domain object listen for the events, and null out
their own members. This works fine, but I really wanted to get as much of
this generic code out of the domain object and into a base class. I want to
minimize the work somebody has to do to implement a domain object.

RMD
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om...
RMD <rm*@nospam.sorry.com> wrote:
Actually, it's not completely useless. The code I pasted was an example, not what I'm actually doing.

My scenario is far too complicated to explain completely, but the gist of it is that I need to null out private member variables of a class from one of it's base classes.


That sounds like a very strange design. What's the bigger picture here?

Given that you're just not going to be able to do it this way, if you
post some more information we may be able to suggest some better ways
of accomplishing the same grander aim.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Nov 15 '05 #5
> So say one of those member domain objects was marked for deletion and was
deleted due to the commit. I wanted to detect that (I have an "OnCommit"
event that the parent domain object listens for from all its domain object
members), and null out the member variable. I can't expose properties for
each of these member variables (for a bunch of reasons), so I wanted to be
able to store a pointer to the original member and null out that memory
location when the event is fired.

Currently, I have the domain object listen for the events, and null out
their own members. This works fine, but I really wanted to get as much of
this generic code out of the domain object and into a base class. I want to minimize the work somebody has to do to implement a domain object.


Well, this is more understandable. This is quite simple to do, in fact. Have
the DomainObject define a (virtual) method that nulls out it's members (if
there are any). Then any class that inherits from DomainObject can
*override* this method to null out it's own members (and optionally null out
it's base class members too). It doesn't matter if the event is handled by
the base class or the subclass... that's the beauty of Polymorphism.

Here's an example of how it would work:

/////////////////////
/// IneritanceTest.cs
///
using System;

namespace Tests {
public class TestClass {
public static void Main(string []args) {
BaseClass b = new BaseClass();
SubClass s = new SubClass();

Console.WriteLine("--- called from a baseclass object ---");
nullThisOut(b);

Console.WriteLine("--- called from a subclass object ---");
nullThisOut(s);
}

public static void nullThisOut(BaseClass obj) {
obj.nullMeOut();
}
}

public class BaseClass {
private String baseClassMember = "something";

public virtual void nullMeOut() {
Console.WriteLine("Nulling out BaseClass Member: {0}",
baseClassMember);
this.baseClassMember = null;
}
}

public class SubClass : BaseClass {
private String subClassMember = "something else";

public override void nullMeOut() {
Console.WriteLine("Nulling out SubClass Member: {0}",
subClassMember);
this.subClassMember = null;

// null out the parent's members too
base.nullMeOut();
}
}
}

Hope that helps,
-JG
Nov 15 '05 #6
RMD
Yeah, this is basically the solution I've been using. I just wanted to have
it done without the inheriting domain object having to do anything.

Oh well. Close enough. :-)

Thanks,
RMD

"Juan Gabriel Del Cid" <jd*****@atrevido.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:#A**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
So say one of those member domain objects was marked for deletion and was deleted due to the commit. I wanted to detect that (I have an "OnCommit"
event that the parent domain object listens for from all its domain object members), and null out the member variable. I can't expose properties for each of these member variables (for a bunch of reasons), so I wanted to be able to store a pointer to the original member and null out that memory
location when the event is fired.

Currently, I have the domain object listen for the events, and null out
their own members. This works fine, but I really wanted to get as much of this generic code out of the domain object and into a base class. I want to
minimize the work somebody has to do to implement a domain object.


Well, this is more understandable. This is quite simple to do, in fact.

Have the DomainObject define a (virtual) method that nulls out it's members (if
there are any). Then any class that inherits from DomainObject can
*override* this method to null out it's own members (and optionally null out it's base class members too). It doesn't matter if the event is handled by
the base class or the subclass... that's the beauty of Polymorphism.

Here's an example of how it would work:

/////////////////////
/// IneritanceTest.cs
///
using System;

namespace Tests {
public class TestClass {
public static void Main(string []args) {
BaseClass b = new BaseClass();
SubClass s = new SubClass();

Console.WriteLine("--- called from a baseclass object ---");
nullThisOut(b);

Console.WriteLine("--- called from a subclass object ---");
nullThisOut(s);
}

public static void nullThisOut(BaseClass obj) {
obj.nullMeOut();
}
}

public class BaseClass {
private String baseClassMember = "something";

public virtual void nullMeOut() {
Console.WriteLine("Nulling out BaseClass Member: {0}",
baseClassMember);
this.baseClassMember = null;
}
}

public class SubClass : BaseClass {
private String subClassMember = "something else";

public override void nullMeOut() {
Console.WriteLine("Nulling out SubClass Member: {0}",
subClassMember);
this.subClassMember = null;

// null out the parent's members too
base.nullMeOut();
}
}
}

Hope that helps,
-JG

Nov 15 '05 #7

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
by: RMD | last post by:
I need to be able to keep a list of object references, and null them out one by one at a later point in time. I realize this can be dangerous, but I have my reasons. I can't figure out, however,...
15
by: JKop | last post by:
Does that Standard explicitly forbid the initiation of a null reference? Is there anything wrong with the following code?: void Blah( std::string const &k ) { if ( !&k ) return; // work with...
10
by: John | last post by:
Ok. I'm not sure whether this is cool or perverted, I need second opinion ;) I define two classes as follows: /********************************************/ public sealed class Dummy {...
7
by: Kevin Cline | last post by:
Why, oh why is it necessary to test an event for null before raising it? Why isn't that case handled automatically, instead of forcing developers to write three lines of wasted boilerplate code...
6
by: evolve | last post by:
why doesn't c# seem to support some kind of 'null date' for instance: i have an application where the user is not obliged to enter a date until an event happens (e.g. a bug was fixed on xyz) ...
4
by: Dixon | last post by:
wats the Diff Between Setting an object to NULL and calling the Dispose() method for that object?
12
by: Joe | last post by:
I might be overworked so please excuse this stupid question... Say I do the following: DataTable table = new DataTable(); myDataAdaptor.Fill(table); dataGrid1.DataSource = table;
6
by: doncee | last post by:
I have a list box that is generated on a form by way of a Parameter Query. Problem is whenever I try to refer to the list box, i.e., to update the underlying table, I am getting a "null" value...
4
by: Joseph Geretz | last post by:
We use a Soap Header to pass a token class (m_Token) back and forth with authenticated session information. Given the following implementation for our Logout method, I vastly prefer to simply code...
19
by: Michael C | last post by:
If we have something like this object x = null; MessageBox.Show(x.ToString()) we get an error. That kindof makes sense but there is no reason the behaviour couldn't be to return an empty...
0
by: taylorcarr | last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
0
by: aa123db | last post by:
Variable and constants Use var or let for variables and const fror constants. Var foo ='bar'; Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar'; Functions function $name$ ($parameters$) { } ...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.