Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody should
decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries at
all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
19  1698 
C# isnt .NET, the libraries are .NET, not the language. Right?
I hate all this .NET Fud its just a mess of PR crap.
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
Being that C# is a standard, even if someone had the desire to make it run
in an unmanaged environment, there would be soooo many problems like
disposing of objects just to name one.
You can use C# objects (.dll) in unmanaged code, but be warned, it's a pain
in the a33.
I totally disagree that .NET is nothing more than marketing hype...it's the
best thing to happen to programming in a long time.
What specific problems are you having with it?
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
Well, for one, the huge gapes in the libraries that you can drive the Death
Star through. Sure sure say call pinvoke, anyway the libraries wrap most of
those, then again, why bother if half the time im spending pinvoking DLLs or
activeX components.
..NET is just the libraries, not the langauage. C# has nothing to do with
..NET. .NET is the base libraries. right.
"William Ryan" <do********@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:#B**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Being that C# is a standard, even if someone had the desire to make it run
in an unmanaged environment, there would be soooo many problems like
disposing of objects just to name one.
You can use C# objects (.dll) in unmanaged code, but be warned, it's a
pain in the a33.
I totally disagree that .NET is nothing more than marketing hype...it's
the best thing to happen to programming in a long time.
What specific problems are you having with it?
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have
of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows..
blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The hype, rather i meant to say the "confusion" that is out there regarding
C# is because of that. Getting people to adopt it is the problem, that
problem caused by the confusion.
Now, back to my main point without all cheerleading posts.
C# isnt .NET, the libraries are .NET, not the language, its not a matter of
being managed or unmanaged. Somebody could build theyre own runtime and sit
C# on it and not have the .NET libraries and still its C# 100% Just not
using .NET libraries.
"William Ryan" <do********@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:#B**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Being that C# is a standard, even if someone had the desire to make it run
in an unmanaged environment, there would be soooo many problems like
disposing of objects just to name one.
You can use C# objects (.dll) in unmanaged code, but be warned, it's a
pain in the a33.
I totally disagree that .NET is nothing more than marketing hype...it's
the best thing to happen to programming in a long time.
What specific problems are you having with it?
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have
of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows..
blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
If you don't have hundreds of man years to invest in creating the compiler
and libraries, you might just want to use C++ for your unmanaged code.
Back in the old days (1996) when I was playing with Java, I wanted a Java
compiler for MSDOS. As far as I know it still doesn't exist. After
switching form DOS to Linux to Windows, I give up on Java. It turned out to
be useless for Windows programming, at least for the stuff I do.
To make a long story short, I now use C# to write .NET code, C++ to write
native code, and managed C++ as the bridge between the two.
If you are serious about unmanaged C#, start a project on Sourceforge and
see if anyone is interested in helping you.
Bill
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
Ok forget unmanaged, still back to the ECMA issue., technically only the
libraries are .NET, (and the runtime) but its possible to build C# to be
compliant 100% yet sit on a different runtime or sit on the same runtime yet
not use the .net libraries.
"Bill Burris" <wb*****@ualberta.ca> wrote in message
news:uJ**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... If you don't have hundreds of man years to invest in creating the compiler
and libraries, you might just want to use C++ for your unmanaged code.
Back in the old days (1996) when I was playing with Java, I wanted a Java
compiler for MSDOS. As far as I know it still doesn't exist. After
switching form DOS to Linux to Windows, I give up on Java. It turned out
to be useless for Windows programming, at least for the stuff I do.
To make a long story short, I now use C# to write .NET code, C++ to write
native code, and managed C++ as the bridge between the two.
If you are serious about unmanaged C#, start a project on Sourceforge and
see if anyone is interested in helping you.
Bill
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have
of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows..
blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The language would not work very well outside of a similar runtime. Its
designed to run within a garbage collected runtime, as there is no explicit
manner to destroy objects; a runtime that supports serialization,
attributes, a unified type system...You couldn't use it like C or C++, you'd
end up writing up a whole runtime and you'd be no better off. Standard C#
keywords have reliances on the runtime to provide a type, they themselves
are nothing but shortcuts to runtime classes. int in itself is not a 4 byte
stack object, it is an alias of System.Int32, which implements a 4 byte
stack object. There is a subtle difference, the language doesn't implicitly
create such things, like C\C++ would do.
Some language features expect framework constructs as well. Foreach works
with IEnumerable\IEnumerator combos, as well as IDisposable. So does the
using construct, as well as other things I've probably not thought of off
hand.
There is no reason you couldn't write another runtime if you felt like it,
but I would question why.
To work without a runtime would require changing the language, standard or
not, its not designed to operate outside of a framework.
ok, so then why is the language standard but not the runtime, or the
libraries if there is so much dependancy on each other. Whats the benifit of
standard C#?
Why not standardise the libraries also, and also the runtime requirements on
the types etc. . and interfaces like IEnumerable.
If they dont do that I see no real benifit of ECMA standard on C#.
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message
news:I1%jb.581657$cF.252666@rwcrnsc53...
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have
of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows..
blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The language would not work very well outside of a similar runtime. Its
designed to run within a garbage collected runtime, as there is no
explicit manner to destroy objects; a runtime that supports serialization,
attributes, a unified type system...You couldn't use it like C or C++,
you'd end up writing up a whole runtime and you'd be no better off. Standard C#
keywords have reliances on the runtime to provide a type, they themselves
are nothing but shortcuts to runtime classes. int in itself is not a 4
byte stack object, it is an alias of System.Int32, which implements a 4 byte
stack object. There is a subtle difference, the language doesn't
implicitly create such things, like C\C++ would do.
Some language features expect framework constructs as well. Foreach works
with IEnumerable\IEnumerator combos, as well as IDisposable. So does the
using construct, as well as other things I've probably not thought of off
hand.
There is no reason you couldn't write another runtime if you felt like it,
but I would question why.
To work without a runtime would require changing the language, standard or
not, its not designed to operate outside of a framework.
PR FUD.
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uP**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... ok, so then why is the language standard but not the runtime, or the
libraries if there is so much dependancy on each other. Whats the benifit
of standard C#?
Why not standardise the libraries also, and also the runtime requirements
on the types etc. . and interfaces like IEnumerable.
If they dont do that I see no real benifit of ECMA standard on C#.
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message
news:I1%jb.581657$cF.252666@rwcrnsc53...
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the
libraries at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The language would not work very well outside of a similar runtime. Its
designed to run within a garbage collected runtime, as there is no
explicit manner to destroy objects; a runtime that supports serialization,
attributes, a unified type system...You couldn't use it like C or C++,
you'd end up writing up a whole runtime and you'd be no better off. Standard
C# keywords have reliances on the runtime to provide a type, they
themselves are nothing but shortcuts to runtime classes. int in itself is not a 4
byte stack object, it is an alias of System.Int32, which implements a 4 byte
stack object. There is a subtle difference, the language doesn't
implicitly create such things, like C\C++ would do.
Some language features expect framework constructs as well. Foreach
works with IEnumerable\IEnumerator combos, as well as IDisposable. So does the
using construct, as well as other things I've probably not thought of
off hand.
There is no reason you couldn't write another runtime if you felt like
it, but I would question why.
To work without a runtime would require changing the language, standard
or not, its not designed to operate outside of a framework.
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uP**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... ok, so then why is the language standard but not the runtime, or the
libraries if there is so much dependancy on each other. Whats the benifit
of standard C#?
Why not standardise the libraries also, and also the runtime requirements
on the types etc. . and interfaces like IEnumerable.
If they dont do that I see no real benifit of ECMA standard on C#.
Well, first, read...the CLI specification[1], especially partition IV. Then,
come back and ask that question again, if you feel it still has merit
1: http://www.ecma-international.org/pu...s/ecma-335.htm
Ok, its NOT .NET , its CLI , .NET is MS's librarys and implementation.
It refers alot to "Base Class Library" yet it doesnt seem to specify the
content of these, where would I find these ?
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bz7kb.584680$cF.254467@rwcrnsc53...
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uP**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... ok, so then why is the language standard but not the runtime, or the
libraries if there is so much dependancy on each other. Whats the
benifit of standard C#?
Why not standardise the libraries also, and also the runtime
requirements on the types etc. . and interfaces like IEnumerable.
If they dont do that I see no real benifit of ECMA standard on C#.
Well, first, read...the CLI specification[1], especially partition IV.
Then, come back and ask that question again, if you feel it still has merit
1: http://www.ecma-international.org/pu...s/ecma-335.htm
It should surely list the content of these and the behaviours of these so
called "Base Class Libraries" that its specifying as standard.
I have yet to see those except on MSDN which is not exactly STANDARD; its
defacto vendor standard atm in my view. Until I see official standard specs.
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:#r**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Ok, its NOT .NET , its CLI , .NET is MS's librarys and implementation.
It refers alot to "Base Class Library" yet it doesnt seem to specify the
content of these, where would I find these ?
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bz7kb.584680$cF.254467@rwcrnsc53...
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uP**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... ok, so then why is the language standard but not the runtime, or the
libraries if there is so much dependancy on each other. Whats the
benifit of standard C#?
Why not standardise the libraries also, and also the runtime
requirements on the types etc. . and interfaces like IEnumerable.
If they dont do that I see no real benifit of ECMA standard on C#.
Well, first, read...the CLI specification[1], especially partition IV.
Then, come back and ask that question again, if you feel it still has merit
1: http://www.ecma-international.org/pu...s/ecma-335.htm
To original poster,
I agree completely with Daniel.
And to answer the previous post. C# was standardized just like all
other "C" based languages. A language has to be standardized before
it can truly be adopted by ALL platforms.
The reason that the .Net framework can not be standardized is because
it IS a platform specific runtime library designed by Microsoft. And
Yes that was a marketing decision, with the intent to make money. Any
platform, i.e. Unix, Mac… can write their own framework libraries.
Finally take "C" for example. It is one of the oldest standardized
languages. A programmer that knows C can write basic code that can be
compiled on any platform give the platform has a compiler. To really
use C to write a real useful program will have to use the System
libraries for that platform. So it doesn't matter if you C if you
don't know the platform libraries.
This is the main reason there has never been a C, C++, C# only
certification. The Certs for all platforms were over the System
Libraries.
Hope this sheds some light of the pervious post.
Glen Jones MCSD
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message news:<I1%jb.581657$cF.252666@rwcrnsc53>... "anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The language would not work very well outside of a similar runtime. Its
designed to run within a garbage collected runtime, as there is no explicit
manner to destroy objects; a runtime that supports serialization,
attributes, a unified type system...You couldn't use it like C or C++, you'd
end up writing up a whole runtime and you'd be no better off. Standard C#
keywords have reliances on the runtime to provide a type, they themselves
are nothing but shortcuts to runtime classes. int in itself is not a 4 byte
stack object, it is an alias of System.Int32, which implements a 4 byte
stack object. There is a subtle difference, the language doesn't implicitly
create such things, like C\C++ would do.
Some language features expect framework constructs as well. Foreach works
with IEnumerable\IEnumerator combos, as well as IDisposable. So does the
using construct, as well as other things I've probably not thought of off
hand.
There is no reason you couldn't write another runtime if you felt like it,
but I would question why.
To work without a runtime would require changing the language, standard or
not, its not designed to operate outside of a framework.
Yes but the ECMA standard documents are referring to Standard libraries,
what libraries are standard, it does not specify them.
"Glen Jones" <gl********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ba**************************@posting.google.c om... To original poster,
I agree completely with Daniel.
And to answer the previous post. C# was standardized just like all
other "C" based languages. A language has to be standardized before
it can truly be adopted by ALL platforms.
The reason that the .Net framework can not be standardized is because
it IS a platform specific runtime library designed by Microsoft. And
Yes that was a marketing decision, with the intent to make money. Any
platform, i.e. Unix, Mac. can write their own framework libraries.
Finally take "C" for example. It is one of the oldest standardized
languages. A programmer that knows C can write basic code that can be
compiled on any platform give the platform has a compiler. To really
use C to write a real useful program will have to use the System
libraries for that platform. So it doesn't matter if you C if you
don't know the platform libraries.
This is the main reason there has never been a C, C++, C# only
certification. The Certs for all platforms were over the System
Libraries.
Hope this sheds some light of the pervious post.
Glen Jones MCSD
"Daniel O'Connell" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in message
news:<I1%jb.581657$cF.252666@rwcrnsc53>... "anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the
libraries at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have
of any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows..
blah with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
The language would not work very well outside of a similar runtime. Its
designed to run within a garbage collected runtime, as there is no
explicit manner to destroy objects; a runtime that supports serialization,
attributes, a unified type system...You couldn't use it like C or C++,
you'd end up writing up a whole runtime and you'd be no better off. Standard
C# keywords have reliances on the runtime to provide a type, they
themselves are nothing but shortcuts to runtime classes. int in itself is not a 4
byte stack object, it is an alias of System.Int32, which implements a 4 byte
stack object. There is a subtle difference, the language doesn't
implicitly create such things, like C\C++ would do.
Some language features expect framework constructs as well. Foreach
works with IEnumerable\IEnumerator combos, as well as IDisposable. So does the
using construct, as well as other things I've probably not thought of
off hand.
There is no reason you couldn't write another runtime if you felt like
it, but I would question why.
To work without a runtime would require changing the language, standard
or not, its not designed to operate outside of a framework.
anonymouse <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: It should surely list the content of these and the behaviours of these so
called "Base Class Libraries" that its specifying as standard.
I have yet to see those except on MSDN which is not exactly STANDARD; its
defacto vendor standard atm in my view. Until I see official standard specs.
Partition 5 of the CLI spec describes how the libraries are documented
in XML format, and that the XML file describing them are to be
considered as part of the ECMA specification. Unfortunately I can't
find the XML file on the ECMA site, but it *is* on the MS web site on
its ECMA page: http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/ecma/
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
If its not on the ECMA or ISO site it aint standard.
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om... anonymouse <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: It should surely list the content of these and the behaviours of these
so called "Base Class Libraries" that its specifying as standard.
I have yet to see those except on MSDN which is not exactly STANDARD;
its defacto vendor standard atm in my view. Until I see official standard
specs.
Partition 5 of the CLI spec describes how the libraries are documented
in XML format, and that the XML file describing them are to be
considered as part of the ECMA specification. Unfortunately I can't
find the XML file on the ECMA site, but it *is* on the MS web site on
its ECMA page:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/ecma/
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
anonymouse <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: If its not on the ECMA or ISO site it aint standard.
Then I suggest you write to ECMA and ask why the extra file isn't on
their site, given that the document which *is* on their site says it
should be counted as part of the specification.
I view it as an unfortunate oversight, nothing sinister.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@msnews.microsoft.c om... anonymouse <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: If its not on the ECMA or ISO site it aint standard.
Then I suggest you write to ECMA and ask why the extra file isn't on
their site, given that the document which *is* on their site says it
should be counted as part of the specification.
I view it as an unfortunate oversight, nothing sinister.
http://www.ecma-international.org/pu...s/e-tr-084.htm
That contains the xsl and transforming tool from intel used to generate the
type library documents and the TypeLibrary file that msdn publishes. I would
assume to get the xml file itself you need to order the CD version, I'm
curious what the published version contains.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
No one mentioned Mono in this thread, so I'll mention it. Anonymouse, check
out MCS: The Ximian C# compiler http://www.go-mono.com/c-sharp.html
MCS runs on Linux with the Mono runtime
Question 2: What is the difference between Mono and the .NET Initiative?
The ".NET Initiative" is a somewhat nebulous company-wide effort by
Microsoft, one part of which is a cross-platform development framework. Mono
is an implementation of the development framework, but not an implementation
of anything else related to the .NET Initiative, such as Passport,
software-as-a-service, or corporate re-branding.
Question 60: Can I develop my applications on Windows, and deploy on a
supported Mono platform (like Linux)?
Yes, you can.
(See http://www.go-mono.com/faq.html)
And it's probably a bit off topic, but check out http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/ (It's tightly integrated with
..NET, which you don't seem to like.)
"anonymouse" <an********@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O2**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Is it possible to have C# run in an unmanaged environemnt if somebody
should decide to implemnent it this way?
Its possible to code C# projects without any dependancy on the libraries
at all that ship with it and use other libraries? or is there a must have of
any of them. I could reaplce System.dll with my own, System.Windows.. blah
with my own etc..
After all these libraries are non standardised, only the language is.
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: John Bentley |
last post by:
Note this is crossposted to comp.lang.javacript and
microsoft.public.dotnet.scripting.
After some Googling and FAQing my understanding of these terms is, crudely:
Javascript (3 different...
|
by: VK |
last post by:
I'm a bit confused about ECMAScript docs.
Can I legally change it format (say from .pdf to .html or .doc) or
publish it on my web-site?
ECMA provides a free of charge pdf version here:...
|
by: Michael Rasmussen |
last post by:
Hi all,
I write to you because I am concerned about the steps taken by ECMA and MS
to substantially change the specifications for ISO-C++.
I have receive the following post from lois...
|
by: Edward Diener |
last post by:
Are there any differences between the version of C++/CLI as implemented
in Visual C++ 2005 and the ECMA-372 C++/CLI Language Specification of
December 2005 freely downloaded from ECMA ?
Asking...
|
by: Andre |
last post by:
Hi,
Does anyone know whether the ECMA, or an other standard document,
specifies a maximum for the value that can be pass to the setTimeOut()
function in Javascript?
Andre
|
by: FAQ server |
last post by:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAQ Topic - How do I convert a Number into a String with exactly 2 decimal places?...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |
