BIG news from the web services front. Amazon will use web services to
tie all its vendors together. The company implementing the system will
be using Java/C++ (migrating to all-java later).
Isn't it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie? http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221 9 1064
In comp.lang.java.advocacy asj <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote:
: Isn't it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
: services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?
Web services were IBM's baby before Microsoft got involved.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ ti*@tt1.org
Actually it is very funny.
MS had to make their way into an market where java had 7 years start. As we
all know, on the desktop people have used the best product for years, but on
conservative markets like servers, SUN and others had convinced people that
they NEED a big expensive server to compensate for the lack of performance
in enviromnents like Java. Proving them wrong could take a long time and be
very hard since when you get yourself into the hands of SUN you expect to be
robbed. As a step on the way, until people get to fully understand their own
good, MS made it possible for the rest of the world to make some use of the
old and expensive tech in Java by forcing SUN to abandon their non standard
way of doing things. Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET
is 3 times as fast, 10 times easier to build but has a significantly lower
price.
"asj" <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:38**************************@posting.google.c om... BIG news from the web services front. Amazon will use web services to tie all its vendors together. The company implementing the system will be using Java/C++ (migrating to all-java later).
Isn't it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?
http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221
In article <HL********@bath.ac.uk>, Tim Tyler <ti*@tt1.org> writes In comp.lang.java.advocacy asj <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote:
: Isn't it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web : services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?
Web services were IBM's baby before Microsoft got involved.
That turns out not to be the case.
Briefly, the XML specification became a W3C recommendation in February
1998, and very shortly after Dave Winer published his interesting
comment that the next big thing would be RPC using XML over HTTP. In
mid-1998 Winer and Don Box were talking to Microsoft about what became
SOAP, and Microsoft even attempted to offer an early version to IETF
(which pretty much ignored it).
IBM got involved at the beginning of 2000, only a few months before
Microsoft announced the .NET strategy and SOAP was submitted to W3C.
Microsoft was emphatically the first major player to become involved
with Web services (in the now accepted sense of RPC- or document-style
communication over SOAP or XML-RPC).
--
Tom Welsh
In comp.lang.java.advocacy Tom Welsh <ne**@tom-welsh.co.uk> wrote:
: In article <HL********@bath.ac.uk>, Tim Tyler <ti*@tt1.org> writes
:>In comp.lang.java.advocacy asj <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>: Isn't it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
:>: services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?
:>
:>Web services were IBM's baby before Microsoft got involved.
: That turns out not to be the case.
A fair cop. http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20010928S0006
....has a more detailed history.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ ti*@tt1.org
"Rolf Enidsson" <ro***********@msecf.com> skrev i melding
news:#e**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET is 3 times as fast,
How could .NET, which is designed according to an architecture almost
exactly like J2EE/Java, be able to crank out 3 times better performance? Of
course, this does not take into account the "secret protocolls", design that
performs fast but does not scale, unfair tweaks and other stuff that mostly
goes into a benchmark comparison.
10 times easier to build
You seem to be on crack.
but has a significantly lower price.
Lower than what? Lower than JBOSS ($0.0)?
Lower than many inexpensive but good J2EE implementations?
Ixtlan
Tom Welsh <ne**@tom-welsh.co.uk> writes: Briefly, the XML specification became a W3C recommendation in February 1998, and very shortly after Dave Winer published his interesting comment that the next big thing would be RPC using XML over HTTP. In mid-1998 Winer and Don Box were talking to Microsoft about what became SOAP, and Microsoft even attempted to offer an early version to IETF (which pretty much ignored it).
XML-RPC, which only sends the request and response data is much more
useful for "normal" calls anyway, without SOAP's excessive baggage
which is mostly there to make it harder to write implementations.
Ixtlan wrote: "Rolf Enidsson" <ro***********@msecf.com> skrev i melding news:#e**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET is 3 times as fast,
How could .NET, which is designed according to an architecture almost exactly like J2EE/Java, be able to crank out 3 times better performance? Of course, this does not take into account the "secret protocolls", design that performs fast but does not scale, unfair tweaks and other stuff that mostly goes into a benchmark comparison.
That pesky HTTP protocol, it's M$'s proprietary secret weapon! Plus the
other magical secret protocols we arent allowed to talk about <scary woo
noise>. No wonder those fiends get better performance!*
Christ, is "this group" (comp.lang.java.advocacy) turning into another
c.o.l.a. mouth frother's paradise or something?!
*of course, this better performance myth - you shouldnt have given it weight
by accepting it - it's M$ FUD or whatever.
"Ixtlan" <ix****@freeroaming.net> wrote in message
news:14********************@news2.e.nsc.no... "Rolf Enidsson" <ro***********@msecf.com> skrev i melding news:#e**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET is 3 times as fast, How could .NET, which is designed according to an architecture almost exactly like J2EE/Java, be able to crank out 3 times better performance?
Of course, this does not take into account the "secret protocolls", design
that performs fast but does not scale, unfair tweaks and other stuff that
mostly goes into a benchmark comparison.
HEHE
The usual rant from poor losers when they can't grasp reality. Even SUN are
implementing the "secret" protocolls found in .NET and at last they are
improving on Java to support the featuers found in modern languages like C#.
It is realy fun to see SUN go from 7 years ahead to trying to "catch up". 10 times easier to build You seem to be on crack.
I leave the drugs to the people of the OpenSource community. After all, they
have used it from start and that might explain things like GPL. but has a significantly lower price. Lower than what? Lower than JBOSS ($0.0)? Lower than many inexpensive but good J2EE implementations?
Ohh, so JBOSS has finally got a licence from SUN for J2EE??? Someone should
tell IBM so that they could trick their customers into another "it is free"
trap, forgetting to tell about their expensive support. In fact, if anyone
want to make money on OpenSource, they have to make sure that the product is
so hard to use that the customer is constantly forced to buy support. If
they ever actually manage to make it good, their income will go away. Ixtlan
begin <es**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
"Rolf Enidsson" <ro***********@r.e.m.o.v.e.msecf.com> writes: "Ixtlan" <ix****@freeroaming.net> wrote in message news:14********************@news2.e.nsc.no... "Rolf Enidsson" <ro***********@msecf.com> skrev i melding news:#e**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET > is 3 times as fast, How could .NET, which is designed according to an architecture almost exactly like J2EE/Java, be able to crank out 3 times better performance? Of course, this does not take into account the "secret protocolls", design that performs fast but does not scale, unfair tweaks and other stuff that mostly goes into a benchmark comparison.
HEHE
Grief, just look at the mangled quoting.
The usual rant from poor losers when they can't grasp reality. Even SUN are implementing the "secret" protocolls found in .NET
Can't be secret if Sun are implementing them now can they? Do you
wintrolls ever read what you have written before clicking the send
button? No need to read any further. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Sridhar |
last post by:
Hi,
We, the students of CEG, Anna University are organizing an online
programming contest as part of aBaCus 2005. The contest itself
will start on 6th March 2005 at 1:00 pm IST and will end...
|
by: asj |
last post by:
BIG news from the web services front. Amazon will use web services to
tie all its vendors together. The company implementing the system will
be using Java/C++ (migrating to all-java later).
...
|
by: don |
last post by:
Is it possible to access the amazon movie collection via web services useing
visual studio.net 2003, framework 1.1 ? I'm writing a personal movie
database system using asp.net and would like to...
|
by: David Specht |
last post by:
I'm having a problem with generating a proxy class for the Amazon Web Service
for Merchant Integration.
Per their instructions I installed WSE 2.0 and referenced the dime version
of their web...
|
by: George Durzi |
last post by:
There still isn't an RSS feed out there that can provide news/stock prices
with a ticker symbol as input. There's supposedly a beta from Yahoo, but
it's not working and there is no estimated...
|
by: gamma27 |
last post by:
hi everyone
I am receiving a NO_FILE_ATTACHED error from Amazon.com (web
services) when I use HttpWebRequest using .NET 2.0 for uploading a tab
delimited inventory file to my seller account.
...
|
by: NotGiven |
last post by:
I would like to build a "store" offering products related to my web site.
Only when they are ready to check out are they sent to amazon.com. Amazon
only has examples for Pearl, Java and .Net. I use...
|
by: BestofAbhi |
last post by:
I am consuming Java Web Services in .NET. The Java Web Services have been
coded using Apache Axis.
The binding style in the WSDL is 'Document' and type is 'Literal'.
I have added these Java...
|
by: Abhijit Salvi |
last post by:
I am consuming Java Web Services in .NET. The Java Web Services have
been coded using Apache Axis.
The binding style in the WSDL is 'Document' and type is 'Literal'.
I have added these Java...
|
by: NotGiven |
last post by:
I want to add some shopping pages to my site. I'd lilke to use the easiest
things possible, thought I am a PHP developer.
What's the easiest way to add a "web store" using Amazon web services or...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
| |