473,396 Members | 1,871 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,396 software developers and data experts.

Any risks if I update my ASP.NET 2.0 application to 3.5?

Hi everyone

I have a web application that is built for ASP.NET 2.0. Now I want to
update it to 3.5, so that I can use the AJAX controls.

What are the risks if I update it? What are the things that I need to
pay attention to?

Thanks in advance for your guidance!

Regards
Warren
Sep 20 '08 #1
7 1427
"Warren Tang" <wa*********@sina.comwrote in message
news:Oj**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
I have a web application that is built for ASP.NET 2.0.
OK.
Now I want to update it to 3.5, so that I can use the AJAX controls.
Very sensible.
What are the risks if I update it?
That the production server doesn't have v3.5 of the Framework installed...
What are the things that I need to pay attention to?
The second letter in the acronym AJAX stands for JavaScript. Once you have
got the first AJAX control working, disable JavaScript in your browser and
watch what happens...
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

Sep 20 '08 #2

Hi Mark

Thank you for the comment.

I noticed that a lot of new stuffs are added to web.config which I
haven't have the time to fully investigate yet. You know people are
usually nervous about the things that they don't know about. I am a lot
more comfortable about the clean web.config in 2.0.

The one thing I am especially worried about is that the existing code
may no longer work properly if I do the migration.

According to your comment, could I say that the possibility of that
regression is zero or quite low?

Regards
Warren

>That the production server doesn't have v3.5 of the Framework
installed...

I don't have to worry about that because the server is maintained by me :)

Regards
Warren

Mark Rae [MVP] wrote:
"Warren Tang" <wa*********@sina.comwrote in message
news:Oj**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I have a web application that is built for ASP.NET 2.0.

OK.
>Now I want to update it to 3.5, so that I can use the AJAX controls.

Very sensible.
>What are the risks if I update it?

That the production server doesn't have v3.5 of the Framework installed...
>What are the things that I need to pay attention to?

The second letter in the acronym AJAX stands for JavaScript. Once you
have got the first AJAX control working, disable JavaScript in your
browser and watch what happens...

Sep 20 '08 #3

Hi Mark

Thank you for the comment.

I noticed that a lot of new stuffs are added to web.config which I
haven't have the time to fully investigate yet. You know people are
usually nervous about the things that they don't know about. I am a lot
more comfortable about the clean web.config in 2.0.

The one thing I am especially worried about is that the existing code
may no longer work properly if I do the migration.

According to your comment, could I say that the possibility of that
regression is zero or quite low?

>That the production server doesn't have v3.5 of the Framework
installed...

I don't have to worry about that because the server is maintained by me :)

Regards
Warren

Mark Rae [MVP] wrote:
"Warren Tang" <wa*********@sina.comwrote in message
news:Oj**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I have a web application that is built for ASP.NET 2.0.

OK.
>Now I want to update it to 3.5, so that I can use the AJAX controls.

Very sensible.
>What are the risks if I update it?

That the production server doesn't have v3.5 of the Framework installed...
>What are the things that I need to pay attention to?

The second letter in the acronym AJAX stands for JavaScript. Once you
have got the first AJAX control working, disable JavaScript in your
browser and watch what happens...

Sep 20 '08 #4
"Warren Tang" <wa*********@sina.comwrote in message
news:OT**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
Hi Mark

Thank you for the comment.

I noticed that a lot of new stuffs are added to web.config which I haven't
have the time to fully investigate yet. You know people are usually
nervous about the things that they don't know about. I am a lot more
comfortable about the clean web.config in 2.0.

The one thing I am especially worried about is that the existing code may
no longer work properly if I do the migration.

According to your comment, could I say that the possibility of that
regression is zero or quite low?
There is very little possibility of a regression because .NET 3.5 does not
replace .NET 2.0 - it adds to it. .NET 3.5 includes .NET 2.0 SP2, but that's
the only change your .NET 2.0 code should see - a service pack.

The .NET 3.5 stuff can't hurt you until you start using it.

This is in total contrast to the upgrade from .NET 1.0 to 1.1 and 1.1 to
2.0. They heard us, and they fixed that.
--
John Saunders | MVP - Connected System Developer

Sep 20 '08 #5
Hi John

Thanks for your patience to explain it to me, and now I understand how
3.5 extends 2.0.

I finally solved the problem, and I'd like to share how I did it. Before
that there is one thing I need to clarify a bit.

Have a look at the hierarchy I mentioned:
--Root folder (Project A, built in ASP.NET 2.0, is a virtual directory
in IIS)
----bin folder for all binaries
----web.config A
----Subfolder B folder (Project B, built in ASP.NET 3.5)
------web.config B

What I want to emphasize is that Subfolder B (Project B) is not a
Virtual Directory or an Application in IIS. Project B is still in the
same application as Project A.

It take me three attempts to get the job done.

1. The first attempt is that I can leave the files and folders in the
above hierarchy as is, expecting everything would be fine. The thought
is that the web.config B will override web.config A, so that A and B
would not affect each other. But I got the following error:

Parser Error Message: It is an error to use a section registered as
allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This
error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an
application in IIS.
Source Error:
Line 27: <authentication mode="Windows"/>

Certainly the proposal is not what I need. Still I know that some
configuration cannot be place in web.config in a sub folder. So I
comment this line in web.config B:

<!--<authentication mode="Windows"/>-->

After that I openned an Ajax page in Subfolder B, I still got an error
saying:

Error: ASP.NET Ajax client-side framework failed to load.

I thought the reason was probably that the modules or handlers are not
able to be loaded from web.config B. I stopped here and went on to my
second attempt.

2. I was thinking maybe I can put all the stuffs in web.config B into a
<locationsection in web.config A. In this way things in web.config A
and B are still not completely mixed up, and Web.config B would not
affect files out of Subfolder B.

Unfortunately, there was another error:

Parser Error Message: Only one <configSectionselement allowed per
config file and if present must be the first child of the root
<configurationelement.

So it seems that <locationis not generous enough to accept the whole
things.

3. OK, now is the time to (or I should see I have to) mix up the two
web.config files. What I did was creating a new 2.0 project, put the
web.config A in the new project, and then updated it to 3.5. All the 3.5
stuffs were added to web.config A (lets say it A+). Everything seemed to
be fine, but it was not long before I was disappointed again.

I put the mixed web.config back into the root folder. However when I
tested the Ajax page in Subfolder, the Page was always postbacked. After
some time of hunting, I found this line made a difference:

<xhtmlConformance mode="Legacy"/>

So I made a modification to web.config A+.

<location path="subfolder">
<system.web>
<xhtmlConformance mode="Transitional"/>
</system.web>
</location>

Finally I got the job done, though not perfectly as I had thought.

I had hoped that there would be some documents specifying what
can/cannot be put in a web.config in a sub folder, and what can/cannot
be put in a <locationsection. If anyone know this kind of document, do
tell me and I will really appreciate it.

So, that's all (Engish is not my native language so I found myself
unable to express all my feelings sometimes).

If you have any thoughts or suggestions, please let me know.

Regards
Warren
Sep 21 '08 #6
Hi John

Thanks for your patience to explain it to me, and now I understand how
3.5 extends 2.0.

I finally solved the problem, and I'd like to share how I did it. Before
that there is one thing I need to clarify a bit.

Have a look at the hierarchy I mentioned:
--Root folder (Project A, built in ASP.NET 2.0, is a virtual directory
in IIS)
----bin folder for all binaries
----web.config A
----Subfolder B folder (Project B, built in ASP.NET 3.5)
------web.config B

What I want to emphasize is that Subfolder B (Project B) is not a
Virtual Directory or an Application in IIS. Project B is still in the
same application as Project A.

It take me three attempts to get the job done.

1. The first attempt is that I can leave the files and folders in the
above hierarchy as is, expecting everything would be fine. The thought
is that the web.config B will override web.config A, so that A and B
would not affect each other. But I got the following error:

Parser Error Message: It is an error to use a section registered as
allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This
error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an
application in IIS.
Source Error:
Line 27: <authentication mode="Windows"/>

Certainly the proposal is not what I need. Still I know that some
configuration cannot be place in web.config in a sub folder. So I
comment this line in web.config B:

<!--<authentication mode="Windows"/>-->

After that I openned an Ajax page in Subfolder B, I still got an error
saying:

Error: ASP.NET Ajax client-side framework failed to load.

I thought the reason was probably that the modules or handlers are not
able to be loaded from web.config B. I stopped here and went on to my
second attempt.

2. I was thinking maybe I can put all the stuffs in web.config B into a
<locationsection in web.config A. In this way things in web.config A
and B are still not completely mixed up, and Web.config B would not
affect files out of Subfolder B.

Unfortunately, there was another error:

Parser Error Message: Only one <configSectionselement allowed per
config file and if present must be the first child of the root
<configurationelement.

So it seems that <locationis not generous enough to accept the whole
things.

3. OK, now is the time to (or I should see I have to) mix up the two
web.config files. What I did was creating a new 2.0 project, put the
web.config A in the new project, and then updated it to 3.5. All the 3.5
stuffs were added to web.config A (lets say it A+). Everything seemed to
be fine, but it was not long before I was disappointed again.

I put the mixed web.config back into the root folder. However when I
tested the Ajax page in Subfolder, the Page was always postbacked. After
some time of hunting, I found this line made a difference:

<xhtmlConformance mode="Legacy"/>

So I made a modification to web.config A+.

<location path="subfolder">
<system.web>
<xhtmlConformance mode="Transitional"/>
</system.web>
</location>

Finally I got the job done, though not perfectly as I had thought.

I had hoped that there would be some documents specifying what
can/cannot be put in a web.config in a sub folder, and what can/cannot
be put in a <locationsection. If anyone know this kind of document, do
tell me and I will really appreciate it.

So, that's all (Engish is not my native language so I found myself
unable to express all my feelings sometimes).

If you have any thoughts or suggestions, please let me know.

Thanks again, John and Mark, for your help.

Regards
Warren
Sep 21 '08 #7

Warren Tang wrote:
I had hoped that there would be some documents specifying what
can/cannot be put in a web.config in a sub folder, and what can/cannot
be put in a <locationsection. If anyone know this kind of document, do
tell me and I will really appreciate it.
Have a look at the bottom of this page if you are interested:
http://www.cnblogs.com/WarrenTang/ar...1/1295427.html
Sep 22 '08 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

3
by: NotGiven | last post by:
OK - I'll add some text here for clarification. I remember reading long ago something about the it was easier to hack a GET than a POST. Is that true? If so, can it be overcome? The reason...
2
by: D Barry | last post by:
Greetings: I am trying to conceive what risks might be created by running multiple SQL servers within a domain under a single domain account, as opposed to 1) running under the local service...
16
by: robert | last post by:
been ruminating on the question (mostly in a 390/v7 context) of whether, and if so when, a row update becomes an insert/delete. i assume that there is a threshold on the number of columns of the...
3
by: Ray | last post by:
I am having my first experience using BLOB as a row in a table. I am using it to insert graphics for labels we print. I have no problem inserting into and select from the table. The graphic is...
9
by: studyandjobs | last post by:
Computer Industry Workers May Face Cancer Risks http://www.studyandjobs.com/Comp_worker_cancer.html or visit http://www.studyandjobs.com/Cancer.html Regards ..
3
by: prakku | last post by:
Hi guys, Can you please give your inputs for this, OS : AIX 5.2 S/W : DB2 ESE 8.1 with fixpak 9.(Partitioned environment)
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.