473,394 Members | 1,879 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,394 software developers and data experts.

Is WebParts soon to be replaced?

jm
Hi, before I build something in it, I wanted to know if it's about to
be replaced or if I should use something else. Also, does anyone know
the bad points or things to avoid when using webparts? Thank you for
any help.
Jun 28 '08 #1
5 1501
webparts is a key technology for sharepoint. as such you should see
better support for building them in the future.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

jm wrote:
Hi, before I build something in it, I wanted to know if it's about to
be replaced or if I should use something else. Also, does anyone know
the bad points or things to avoid when using webparts? Thank you for
any help.
Jun 28 '08 #2
bruce barker wrote:
webparts is a key technology for sharepoint. as such you should see
better support for building them in the future.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
Furthermore (AFAIK) WebParts are key components for ASP.NET.
Jun 28 '08 #3
While web parts have not taken off in the manner MS may have wanted, I doubt
they are going away any time soon. First, they are used rather heavily in
SharePoint, which is gaining steam in the corporate world. Second, they
comprise a key part of the developer "selling" tours Microsoft has been
offering. Finally, they are an easy way to allow a user to pick and choose
his functionality.

If Silverlight takes over the web completely (doubtful any time soon, if
ever), web parts may be a thing of the past. But, you have plenty of time
before that happens.

There is currently no plans for any new technology to replace web parts.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

Subscribe to my blog
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com/lists/feed.rss

or just read it:
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com/

*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:8a**********************************@d45g2000 hsc.googlegroups.com...
Hi, before I build something in it, I wanted to know if it's about to
be replaced or if I should use something else. Also, does anyone know
the bad points or things to avoid when using webparts? Thank you for
any help.
Jun 28 '08 #4
"better support ... in the future" - we have been hearing that line since
the day they were introduced , this is the future - what happened ?
web parts have not improved one bit from the 1st release despite all
promises of things 'in the works'
limited functionality , ie only support ( drag&drop / menus ) , old style -
menus instead of window-type icons. 100% postback design with zero ajax
integration.
too bad too - webparts ( asp.net - no idea about sp ) had much potential
but imo development ground to a halt after the proof of concept phase and
here these years & versions later, they remain unchanged since day one.
"Fernando Gómez" <fe****************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
bruce barker wrote:
>webparts is a key technology for sharepoint. as such you should see
better support for building them in the future.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

Furthermore (AFAIK) WebParts are key components for ASP.NET.

Jul 2 '08 #5
jm
I was able to get Firefox 3 to use webparts with the futures
download. It wasn't exactly the same as ie (the menu wasn't the
same), but you could drag and drop just like ie.

On Jul 2, 4:38*pm, "gerry" <g...@newsgroup.nospamwrote:
"better support ... in the future" - we have been hearing that line since
the day they were introduced , this is the future - what happened ?
web parts have not improved one bit from the 1st release despite all
promises of things 'in the works'
limited functionality , ie only support ( drag&drop / menus ) , old style -
menus instead of window-type icons. *100% postback design with zero ajax
integration.
too bad too - *webparts ( asp.net - no idea about sp ) had much potential
but imo development ground to a halt after the proof of concept phase and
here these years & versions later, they remain unchanged since day one.

"Fernando Gómez" <fernando.a.gome...@gmail.comwrote in message

news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
bruce barker wrote:
webparts is a key technology for sharepoint. as such you should see
better support for building them in the future.
-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
Furthermore (AFAIK) WebParts are key components for ASP.NET.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Jul 2 '08 #6

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

10
by: Barbara Alderton | last post by:
I am working with SharePoint 2003. I am using (using C#) an existing webpart as a child control (server control). I need to access/manipulate the HTML that the control outputs prior to rendering...
2
by: fa | last post by:
Hi there, I have created an .aspx file using Asp.Net (2.0) C#, which contains two webparts. How can i pass data/parameter between these two, so that when user chooses an item from WebPart1, I can...
1
by: Astera | last post by:
I seem to be having a problem using web parts after the beta 2 release. Any time I try to have the WebPartManager on any page, I get the exception listed below. I've gone through the steps listed...
0
by: Alan Silver | last post by:
Hello, Sorry for the long post, but I want to try and explain it clearly... I'm using webparts for (possibly) an unusual scenario, and I'm having problems. This could be because I'm doing...
3
by: Bart Van Hemelen | last post by:
I'm working on a project where the user of a site will receive custom content, depending on a set of parameters. The content will all be contained in UserControls (.ascx), that will be used as...
6
by: brianroisentul | last post by:
Hello, I'd like to know which dll I have to reference when I use the System.Web.UI.WebControls.Webparts namespace. Thanks, Brian
3
by: Q. John Chen | last post by:
I have an INTRAnet site that need to add some content management feature. And I thought that I can use the WebParts. Since this is an internal site, I use Windows authentication so the use don't...
1
by: sales | last post by:
How can I turn a webpart of for all users in the default mode and on Reset personalation. I have a portal page in ASP.net and have 7 webparts displayed, I only want 6 displayed which the option to...
3
by: clintonG | last post by:
Why don't we see more WebParts being used on the web? SharePoint gets all the fun? And what are the prevailing opinions be they what they may about the use of WebParts rather than WPF when the...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.