asp.net url rewriting

[thoeone]

Hi,
Anyone have any experience with url rewriting on asp.net and performance issues. I want to know how much of a lost in performace(percentage wise) if i use Context.RewritePath() function to make a friendly url. Any experience or links to benchmarks is appreciated.

#source: http://www.codeverge.net

[Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)]

The overhead should be in milli- or micro-seconds for an HTTP Handler to
take "friendly URLs" and turn them into a non-friendly path. I have only
played with this and not hammered at scale (and am no longer working on the
project), so I cannot give you figures, but the Handlers occur as part of
the ASP.NET process, and incur almost no overhead. I am sure you could write
an inefficient method that makes this statement incorrect. :-)

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
<thoeonewrote in message news:ek**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Hi,
Anyone have any experience with url rewriting on asp.net and performance
issues. I want to know how much of a lost in performace(percentage wise)
if i use Context.RewritePath() function to make a friendly url. Any
experience or links to benchmarks is appreciated.

#source: http://www.codeverge.net

[Patrice]

This is a server side only thing that does something that is quite
straighforward. The only thing I could think of would be depending on your
own code (for example if you perform additional queries to the DB to
translate a friendly part into a product primary key or something similar).
<thoeonea écrit dans le message de news:
ek**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Hi,
Anyone have any experience with url rewriting on asp.net and performance
issues. I want to know how much of a lost in performace(percentage wise)
if i use Context.RewritePath() function to make a friendly url. Any
experience or links to benchmarks is appreciated.

#source: http://www.codeverge.net

[theone]

according to this article:
http://aspadvice.com/blogs/ssmith/ar...xperience.aspx
"Upon removing the module, my load test went from a peak load of 80 requests/sec to 550 requests/sec [GOOD]. That's a 587% improvement"


#source: http://www.codeverge.net