I have an W2k3IIS server with .NET 1.1 and 2.0 installed. I have a
website, which I'd like to run as 1.1. So I go to that website/app's
properties, and on the ASP.NET tab, I select 1.1.
I have a test page that triggers an event validation (which is a
feature introduced in 2.0). I hit that test page and the error is
generated. So apparently, the site (or, what it really looks like, is
just the page) is still running in 2.0. So I add the following
startup tag to the web.config in the <configurationtag:
<configuration>
<startup>
<requiredRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
<supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
</startup>
....
</configuration>
The page still causes the event validation error (meaning, still
running as .NET 2.0).
So what am I doing wrong here? What do I need to do to get the site/
page to run as 1.1?
NOTE: One of the ways I know the page is running 2.0 is that I can add
the attribute enableEventValidation into the @Page directive and the
page compiler doesn't choke. 2 1254
..NET is backward compatible, not forward compatible. So, code written and
compiled on 2.0 will not run on 1.x, just as you see.
"slolife" <sl*****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@y27g2000pre.googlegr oups.com...
>I have an W2k3IIS server with .NET 1.1 and 2.0 installed. I have a
website, which I'd like to run as 1.1. So I go to that website/app's
properties, and on the ASP.NET tab, I select 1.1.
I have a test page that triggers an event validation (which is a
feature introduced in 2.0). I hit that test page and the error is
generated. So apparently, the site (or, what it really looks like, is
just the page) is still running in 2.0. So I add the following
The site DOES NOT run in 2.0. It runs in 1.1, so your code developed on 2.0
causes error: 1.1 runtime does not know 2.0 code.
You can do the opposite: developing app with 1.x, and run in with either 1,x
or 2.0 runtime.
startup tag to the web.config in the <configurationtag:
<configuration>
<startup>
<requiredRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
<supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
</startup>
...
</configuration>
The page still causes the event validation error (meaning, still
running as .NET 2.0).
So what am I doing wrong here? What do I need to do to get the site/
page to run as 1.1?
NOTE: One of the ways I know the page is running 2.0 is that I can add
the attribute enableEventValidation into the @Page directive and the
page compiler doesn't choke.
Let me narrow it down, because I realize my initial description was
long winded:
The asp.net dll is compiled in 1.0, the whole website is marked to run
as 1.1. Nothing is supposed to be 2.0. IIS and the
aspnet_regiis.exe -lk say that all sites and apps are running 1.1.
Web.config, like I explained, tries to force 1.1.
Despite all of that, I have a page with this code in the HTML:
..NET Version=<%=System.Environment.Version.ToString()%>
The page spits out:
..NET Version=2.0.50727.832
Why is it running 2.0?
On Oct 24, 7:05 am, "Norman Yuan" <NoAddr...@NoEmail.fakewrote:
.NET is backward compatible, not forward compatible. So, code written and
compiled on 2.0 will not run on 1.x, just as you see.
"slolife" <slol...@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@y27g2000pre.googlegr oups.com...
I have an W2k3IIS server with .NET 1.1 and 2.0 installed. I have a
website, which I'd like to run as 1.1. So I go to that website/app's
properties, and on the ASP.NET tab, I select 1.1.
I have a test page that triggers an event validation (which is a
feature introduced in 2.0). I hit that test page and the error is
generated. So apparently, the site (or, what it really looks like, is
just the page) is still running in 2.0. So I add the following
The site DOES NOT run in 2.0. It runs in 1.1, so your code developed on 2.0
causes error: 1.1 runtime does not know 2.0 code.
You can do the opposite: developing app with 1.x, and run in with either 1,x
or 2.0 runtime.
startup tag to the web.config in the <configurationtag:
<configuration>
<startup>
<requiredRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
<supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322"/>
</startup>
...
</configuration>
The page still causes the event validation error (meaning, still
running as .NET 2.0).
So what am I doing wrong here? What do I need to do to get the site/
page to run as 1.1?
NOTE: One of the ways I know the page is running 2.0 is that I can add
the attribute enableEventValidation into the @Page directive and the
page compiler doesn't choke.
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: MuZZy |
last post by:
Hi,
I got a situation here :) an dwonder if someone can help me.
I have an MDI app and say, the child form has a button, clicking on which calls a database
transaction - grabbing a lot of tables...
|
by: Mike McGavin |
last post by:
Hello everyone.
Can anyone suggest if there's a way to force a plpgsql stored procedure
to be recompiled every time that it's called, based on the values of the
parameters that it's given? I...
|
by: melanieab |
last post by:
Hi,
Before I go into detail, is there any way to force a button to get that
dotted box on it that shows it's in focus? Just saying btn1.Focus(); isn't
working for me. Btn1 is definitely the thing...
|
by: Zytan |
last post by:
TextChanged is only called when the user modifes a control's text, not
if the program does.
How can I make it be called when the program modifies the text?
Zytan
|
by: Ken Fine |
last post by:
I am using ASP.NET's CreateUserWizard control. I want to force the visitor
to use a username and e-mail address that I am providing in programming, and
I do not want the visitor to be able to edit...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: jfyes |
last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
|
by: ArrayDB |
last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Shællîpôpï 09 |
last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
|
by: af34tf |
last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
|
by: Faith0G |
last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...
| |