By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
424,969 Members | 1,564 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 424,969 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

DotNetNuke Header

P: n/a
On my main page (Default.ascx), when I right click and View Source, I
get all this extra junk about DNN, how do I remove it?

<!--
************************************************** ********************************--
>
<!-- DotNetNuke - http://www.dotnetnuke.com
-->
<!-- Copyright (c)
2002-2007 -->
<!-- by DotNetNuke Corporation -->
<!--
************************************************** ********************************--
>
Jun 7 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
10 Replies


P: n/a
I'll put my neck on the chopping block, since I don't use DNN but,
wouldn't editing the ascx file itself do the job ?

Are you sure it's "default.ascx" and not "default.aspx" ?

In that case, check to see which objects are
imported into "default.aspx"...and edit the culprit.

In case that's hard-coded into the assemblies, look for the assembly
which is injecting that code, edit the source...and recompile DNN.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@w5g2000hsg.googlegrou ps.com...
On my main page (Default.ascx), when I right click and View Source, I
get all this extra junk about DNN, how do I remove it?

<!--
************************************************** ********************************--
>>
<!-- DotNetNuke - http://www.dotnetnuke.com
-->
<!-- Copyright (c)
2002-2007 -->
<!-- by DotNetNuke Corporation -->
<!--
************************************************** ********************************--

Jun 7 '07 #2

P: n/a
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:eX**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
In case that's hard-coded into the assemblies, look for the assembly
which is injecting that code, edit the source...and recompile DNN.
I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)
--
http://www.markrae.net

Jun 7 '07 #3

P: n/a
re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)

No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps, doesn't it ?

DNN has never been something which perked my interest.
I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.

I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.

<sigh>


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPAMrae.netwrote in message news:Ok**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:eX**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>In case that's hard-coded into the assemblies, look for the assembly
which is injecting that code, edit the source...and recompile DNN.
I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)

Jun 7 '07 #4

P: n/a
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)

No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps,
doesn't it ?
You'd think that... :-) The basic rule of thumb with DNN (apart, obviously,
from getting rid of it) is that it only really works so long as you never
need to change anything...
DNN has never been something which perked my interest.
Me neither...
I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.
It may be of limited use to people who aren't developers, I suppose... a bit
like FrontPage...
I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.

<sigh>
Yep - 'nuff said!
--
http://www.markrae.net

Jun 7 '07 #5

P: n/a
On Jun 7, 3:48 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.netwrote:
"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote in messagenews:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl. ..
re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)
No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps,
doesn't it ?

You'd think that... :-) The basic rule of thumb with DNN (apart, obviously,
from getting rid of it) is that it only really works so long as you never
need to change anything...
DNN has never been something which perked my interest.

Me neither...
I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.

It may be of limited use to people who aren't developers, I suppose... a bit
like FrontPage...
I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.
<sigh>

Yep - 'nuff said!

--http://www.markrae.net

So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove
it?

Jun 8 '07 #6

P: n/a
You need to examine the code...and figure it out.

Check to see

1. which namespaces are imported
2. which user controls are called
3. which class properties, methods and/or fields are called
4. whether there's a header included in a master page

If you are unable to determine that, post the code for one of the pages.
Maybe somebody can use their eagle eyes to assist you in finding it.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@n15g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
>
So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove it?

Jun 8 '07 #7

P: n/a
"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@n15g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove
it?
You *might* be able to get some better help in the DNN forums...

I say *might* because the people in there get really sniffy at people who
are trying to "hack about" with their product...

Good luck - you're going to need it... :-)
--
http://www.markrae.net

Jun 8 '07 #8

P: n/a
As far as I remember DNN, it's not complete open source.
Project has DLL in it that does not come with source.

That DLL does it. So you can not remove it (without going into DLL)

George.
"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@n15g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
On Jun 7, 3:48 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.netwrote:
>"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote in
messagenews:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl ...
re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)
No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps,
doesn't it ?

You'd think that... :-) The basic rule of thumb with DNN (apart,
obviously,
from getting rid of it) is that it only really works so long as you never
need to change anything...
DNN has never been something which perked my interest.

Me neither...
I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.

It may be of limited use to people who aren't developers, I suppose... a
bit
like FrontPage...
I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.
<sigh>

Yep - 'nuff said!

--http://www.markrae.net


So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove
it?

Jun 8 '07 #9

P: n/a
If you only see it when you do view source, is it really a show stopper for
your app?
the information your looking for is in the DLL and you can't remove unless
you reverse engineer the DLL and try that, but if you do that good luck in
trying to get it to work again.

"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@n15g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
On Jun 7, 3:48 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.netwrote:
>"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote in
messagenews:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl ...
re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)
No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps,
doesn't it ?

You'd think that... :-) The basic rule of thumb with DNN (apart,
obviously,
from getting rid of it) is that it only really works so long as you never
need to change anything...
DNN has never been something which perked my interest.

Me neither...
I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.

It may be of limited use to people who aren't developers, I suppose... a
bit
like FrontPage...
I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.
<sigh>

Yep - 'nuff said!

--http://www.markrae.net


So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove
it?

Jun 8 '07 #10

P: n/a
re:
!As far as I remember DNN, it's not complete open source.
!Project has DLL in it that does not come with source.

Are you sure about that ? I thought *all* source code is included.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"George Ter-Saakov" <gt****@cardone.comwrote in message
news:ud**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
As far as I remember DNN, it's not complete open source.
Project has DLL in it that does not come with source.

That DLL does it. So you can not remove it (without going into DLL)

George.
"JPabich" <jp*****@eisincorporated.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@n15g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
>On Jun 7, 3:48 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.netwrote:
>>"Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote in
messagenews:Og**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gb l...

re:
!I'm guessing you've never tried... ;-)

No, but the same general principle applies to all open source apps,
doesn't it ?

You'd think that... :-) The basic rule of thumb with DNN (apart, obviously,
from getting rid of it) is that it only really works so long as you never
need to change anything...

DNN has never been something which perked my interest.

Me neither...

I can see how some would get excited about it but...not me.

It may be of limited use to people who aren't developers, I suppose... a bit
like FrontPage...

I remember when DNN came out. It was based on IBuySpy.

<sigh>

Yep - 'nuff said!

--http://www.markrae.net


So does anyone know where this header information is stored to remove
it?


Jun 8 '07 #11

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.