By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
428,683 Members | 1,597 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 428,683 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Changing from Server.Transfer to Response.Redirect.

P: n/a
What are the ramifications of changing from Server.Transfer to
Response.Redirect? I need to keep track of the URLs being used.

Can you do relative addresses through redirect?

TIA - Jeff.
Jun 4 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
2 Replies


P: n/a
"Mufasa" <jb@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:ek**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
What are the ramifications of changing from Server.Transfer to
Response.Redirect?
Google is your friend:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourc...%2eRedirect%22
Can you do relative addresses through redirect?
Yes.
--
http://www.markrae.net

Jun 4 '07 #2

P: n/a
Yes you can do relative addresses via Response.Redirect.
Response.Redirect will keep the browser informed of the "correct" URL at all
times, which it sounds like you desire.
The performance is poorer with Response.Redirect than with Server.Transfer
because of the extra round trip required to the browser and back.
Here's more info:
http://SteveOrr.net/faq/TransferRedirect.aspx

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr,
MCSD, MVP, CSM, ASPInsider
http://SteveOrr.net
"Mufasa" <jb@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:ek**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
What are the ramifications of changing from Server.Transfer to
Response.Redirect? I need to keep track of the URLs being used.

Can you do relative addresses through redirect?

TIA - Jeff.

Jun 4 '07 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.